No Charges For Man Who Killed Burglars


Recommended Posts

This is murder of the 1st degree, he had prior intention and commited the act...

It was commited outside his house with shots to the back.

Anyone actually has doubt if these were americans citizens and not illegal immigrants the results would be diffrent?

I'm not sure whether 1st degree or manslaughter, or some other crime of murder variant, but he certainly should have been convicted of killing them, in my opinion.

And, yes, if these were two kids that were sons of a neighbor, I am pretty sure that the verdict would have been different. It would have pitted neighbor against neighbor, instead of US citizen bravely defending property from thieving immigrants. (N)

The 911 call is classic if you haven't listened to it. I definitely think the guy was going too far by going outside, but if he was correct in saying that they came onto his property and he felt threatened, then fire away. Thieves won't come around anytime soon if they know they are getting a shotgun slug that will send bodyparts flying for their troubles.

Keep in mind he can't do all the calm and cool thinking that everybody over the internet takes advantage of. Spur of the moment, adrenaline pumping, and not even a shred of doubt of what is going on right in front of you makes you act a bit differently than normal.

You would have a point... except for the whole 911 call where he states he is heading out specifically to shoot and kill them. :|

"They came in the front yard with me, man. I had no choice."

Actually, he did have a choice. He could have stayed in his house as advised by the 911 operator. He could have waited for police to get there and handle it. Not a hard concept. Breaking and entering doesn't mean your neighbor has the right to open fire and get away with it. Material things can be replaced. Lives can't.

I sure hope my neighbors AREN'T so mentally unstable as to think they should kill someone for walking away with material things. Anyone ever hear of this thing called insurance? But I guess for certain people on this board, they'd prefer homicidal neighbors that open fire at the first sign of trouble. To each their own I guess :rolleyes:

simple: was the man justified in killing these people?

1) if the robbers were leaving the neighbor's house and fleeing with the good, then NO. the trained 911 operator told him to stay inside the house! He should have stayed inside! no amount of things stolen is ever worth risking your life over! things can be replaced!

2) if the robbers were targetting his house next, then yes he was justified- because then the situation directly involves him.

he went out of his way to insert himself in that situation. calling 911 was all he was required to do as a good citizen and a good neighbour! \you need to leave this kind of stuff to the cops. Also when a highly trained 911 operator tells you to do something, YOU DO IT! they are not trying to put you in harms way!

and when he called back- it reminded me of my friend who use to work as a bouncer. what he would do when confronted outside the clubs by drunken people is, he would yell as loud as he could "hey man back off! i dont want to hurt you" then he would get in real close like he was hugging them and yell "hey get your hands off me!" and then he would proceed and kick the living crap out of them! why did he say all that? because when the cops showed up he had plenty of witnesses that heard him say that before the altercation.

sound familiar?

People are so quick to use guns over judgment. Now tell me who the real animals are?. I went out the other day and bought a gun because of the Supreme Court ruling. When asked why I was purchasing a gun, I pointed over at the other patrons of the store and said "That's why".

People are so quick to use guns over judgment. Now tell me who the real animals are?. I went out the other day and bought a gun because of the Supreme Court ruling. When asked why I was purchasing a gun, I pointed over at the other patrons of the store and said "That's why".

well since you are doing the same thing don't complain

Breaking and entering doesn't mean your neighbor has the right to open fire and get away with it.

actually, if you read the article, it does. you are allowed to defend your property and your neighbors property with deadly force in texas

"The message we're trying to send today is the criminal justice system works," Harris County District Attorney Kenneth Magidson told reporters at the courthouse
LOL this is the biggest BS i've heard this week. kids who pirate songs and movies are getting 30 years in jail, where murders are getting 15 with "good behavior"

i don't support being a vigilante. i think the guy should have stayed inside the house, but if he had any confidence that the police would show up and handle the situation then he wouldn't have gone outside to defend his house and himself

but don't even try to save face by saying the court system works. it's so f'd up it's not even funny

actually, if you read the article, it does. you are allowed to defend your property and your neighbors property with deadly force in texas

Actually, if you read the article you see it says "The use of deadly force is carefully limited in Texas law to certain circumstances", pretty much meaning aggravated robbery.

... but if he had any confidence that the police would show up and handle the situation then he wouldn't have gone outside to defend his house and himself
Except he didn't "go outside to defend his house and himself". He announced his intention was to kill.

I agree he went a little overboard in his actions, but at the same time I wouldn't object to someone like him being my neighbor. :yes:

Also, had they not been robbing from someones house they wouldn't have gotten shot and be dead now. ;)

He should've gotten some jail time for shooting them, but again had they not been stealing from someone they'd still be walking, talking, and breathing right now.

Death for robbery is harsh. But fear can be a very useful tool in preventing crime. If death was the penalty for robbery how many people do you think will try that ? Besides if somebody still tried it then they sure knew what was going to them so who's fault is it ?

I do not have a problem if a guy threatening got killed because of an act of self defense by a victim. In this case the man walked outside and put himself in danger while he could have very well stayed inside and been safe. Besides he announces his intentions before stepping out. Although his ultimate goal was right the way he went about achieving it was unfortunately incorrect.

In my opinion everyone should have a weapon that will very quickly disable a person but not kill them a la bear tranquilizer. Had the man used something like that the criminals would be alive and in jail and he would have safeguarded his neighbors belongings without getting in to trouble.

Edited by sweetsam
You would have a point... except for the whole 911 call where he states he is heading out specifically to shoot and kill them. :|

So what if some of the things he says don't match up or are a little bit extreme. I don't always make complete sense or say something I mean to say when my heart's racing so fast I feel like I ran a mile either. You're evaluating him without understanding him or his situation at all, which is exactly what I was originally talking about.

It's very easy to judge when you have no idea what it's like. He did what he felt was right, and that's all we can expect out of anybody. If this man went to prison it wouldn't be because he intentionally murdered somebody, it would be because he made the wrong choice. Which, surprisingly enough, is a very easy thing to do in the spur of the moment. I don't condemn people for that.

^^^ I didn't say that he didn't think it was right. Well, I am sure if you asked him (or any other sane person) they would say that it was NOT right to kill someone for robbery.

Yet that is what he said he was going to do.

So, now we have an accepted penalty of "death" for the crime of "robbery". I suppose no one ought to steal a candy bar from a local store, eh? ;)

At some point you have to agree that the punishment (two executions, one after the other) does not fit the crime (breaking & entering, theft).

Edited by markjensen
No burglar deserves death though!

Well, no innocent man deserves to have his house burgled by two selfish, unethical, untrustworthy, useless to society, PR**KS!!!

I think they got exactly what they deserved! Burglars cause misery to people daily! It's not just a case of having 'a couple of ya things nicked'. Some burglars steal sentimental property, some of them beat up the homeowners of which they are robbing (e.g. only today I saw in the paper this helpless, defenseless, pensioner got beaten badly by burglars! :angry:).

At the end of the day, if a person's possesions are stolen, it can cause a lot of grief & misery for that person. I'm sure you would be devastated if your laptop/PC/Mac & all your backups were stolen wouldn't you? Your music, pictures, videos, uni/school work, documents relating to your career, etc would be gone. No more! If that happened to me, I would want the people who did it to be extrememly hurt!

If I had to, for self defense, etc, then I would definately kill a person who is robbing my house, because they have no right to be there & it is my hardearned possesions been taken by some selfish ******!

It's ridiculous to suggest they don't deserve what they got for the misery they cause to others!

At some point you have to agree that the punishment (two executions, one after the other) does not fit the crime (breaking & entering, theft).

Again, I believe I must mention the misery & vast emotional pain (& sometimes physical pain) a robbery can cause to a person.

Some burglars will hurt their victims; others will take sentimental/valuable items which they have no right to do! The items are no theirs', why should they take them!?

Referring to your comment about 'taking a candy bar from a store'...: that is also very wrong & needs to be punished. How do you punish a crime like that? Yes, murder for something that small is very harsh (but tbh it he/she shouldn't be taking it in the first place, so they would deserve it), but prison for a fair amount of time should do the trick!

If you let people off, or give them a light punishment, they are never going to learn!

In my eyes, the burglars who were shot dead got exactly what they deserved for the misery & unnecessary pain they cause to others! Good riddance to them! They are obviously useless to society if they have to stoop so low as to emotionally torture innocent people!!!

Wow. I thought the tape I heard was a hoax. I heard this 911 call online.

Before people start talking about intent etc. if you had listened to the tape, you would know that he was scared for his life etc. He thought that the were coming for him next and didn't know whether they were armed.

I feel sorry for him and them.

On the one hand I think that burglars deserve what they get, and wish for laws like this in england, but on the other you have to pity those driven to crime.

Again, I believe I must mention the misery & vast emotional pain (& sometimes physical pain) a robbery can cause to a person.

Some burglars will hurt their victims; others will take sentimental/valuable items which they have no right to do! The items are no theirs', why should they take them!?

Referring to your comment about 'taking a candy bar from a store'...: that is also very wrong & needs to be punished. How do you punish a crime like that? Yes, murder for something that small is very harsh (but tbh it he/she shouldn't be taking it in the first place, so they would deserve it), but prison for a fair amount of time should do the trick!

If you let people off, or give them a light punishment, they are never going to learn!

In my eyes, the burglars who were shot dead got exactly what they deserved for the misery & unnecessary pain they cause to others! Good riddance to them! They are obviously useless to society if they have to stoop so low as to emotionally torture innocent people!!!

While harsh, you just effectively said you wouldn't object to the death penalty for stealing a 50 cent candy bar. Wow! Would you condone execution for speeding, copyright infringement or a host of other petty crime because, well, they shouldn't have done it in the first place? Im sure it would see a solid reduction in "crime", but at what cost to society and otherwise good people.

Im also not about to consider theft, sentimental items or not, emotional torture that warrants death. I can think of far worse ways to be "emotionally tortured".

Wow. I thought the tape I heard was a hoax. I heard this 911 call online.

Before people start talking about intent etc. if you had listened to the tape, you would know that he was scared for his life etc. He thought that the were coming for him next and didn't know whether they were armed.

I feel sorry for him and them.

On the one hand I think that burglars deserve what they get, and wish for laws like this in england, but on the other you have to pity those driven to crime.

I listened to the tape and i don't believe for a moment he sounded as if he was scared for his life. He said half a dozen times he was going to go outside with the intent to kill and sounded pretty calm about it to me.

While harsh, you just effectively said you wouldn't object to the death penalty for stealing a 50 cent candy bar. Wow! Would you condone execution for speeding, copyright infringement or a host of other petty crime because, well, they shouldn't have done it in the first place? Im sure it would see a solid reduction in "crime", but at what cost to society and otherwise good people.

Im also not about to consider theft, sentimental items or not, emotional torture that warrants death. I can think of far worse ways to be "emotionally tortured".

Yes, you're right. I did, in essence, condone the death penalty for somebody stealing a 50 cent candy bar... however, I also said, a petty theft like that should really only get a very long prison sentence because it is not really causing much misery to anyone. If a person got the death penalty (or got shot) for stealing a 50 cent candy bar, however, that wouldn't bother me, I wouldn't care & I would think that it serves them right, in a way, because they shouldn't steal, even something as little as that.

You said "...but at what cost to society and otherwise good people." Who are the "otherwise good people"? You cannot say burglars & anyone who does another hurtful crime (with intent) good people, can you? Anybody who steals anything in my mind is untrustworthy & evil. They are useless to society, Some person said they feel sorry for people who are "driven to crime & theft". No one is ever driven to crime & theft. It is their choice. If they cannot afford to buy something, then they should find ways, or, they should do what a lot of tramps/bums do & beg - it is better than stealing.

As you can tell, I feel very strongly about stealing & theft, as well as other hurtful crimes like rape, murder, pedophilia, GBH, etc. I'm worried that if somebody robbed my house, they could hurt me, or they could steal sentimental possessions, or they could steal my laptop & back-up hardrive - meaning all of the files & folders I have spent time accumulating & organizing will be gone for good... all my music, all my videos, all my pictures & all my university pictures. A person who does a dreadful crime like that deserves the death penalty in my eyes.

Prison is pointless as it is a waste of tax payers money & people get let out earlier than they should (with many re-offending). Prisons can also be very lenient. I know of one prisoner I was reading about who got a TV & everything. They shouldn't! If prison is that nice to them, they are more likely to re-offend. If anything, they should stay in thier stone cell with a stone toilet & a very uncomfortable bed. The fact that they have offended in that way once before, means they should get the death penalty. It serves them right! Get them off the face of this earth as they are useless to society & some of them have murdered/hurt innocent people.

You say what will the death penalty do to society? Well what does that mean? The only thing it can do is stop people wanting to commit hurtful crimes, can't it? It would be good to society. I mean, I only mean the death penalty should be used in cases where it is 100% proven that the criminal has done the crime -like in this case of robbery. If the homeowner had shot them so they were just injured before the police came, then you would know for sure it was them who did it.

Yes, you're right. I did, in essence, condone the death penalty for somebody stealing a 50 cent candy bar... however, I also said, a petty theft like that should really only get a very long prison sentence because it is not really causing much misery to anyone. If a person got the death penalty (or got shot) for stealing a 50 cent candy bar, however, that wouldn't bother me, I wouldn't care & I would think that it serves them right, in a way, because they shouldn't steal, even something as little as that.

Ok, let's play a little game I call The Value of Human Life.

A toddler grabs a 50 cent candy bar at the checkout line while mommy is getting the cash out of her wallet. That kid's life is worth something under $0.50 to you, right? Execution time.

Ok, what if it was a 5 cent mint. You know the ones they sell individually. Is that life worth something between a nickel and 50 cents? Or is it worth even less than a nickel?

I'm sure you would be devastated if your laptop/PC/Mac & all your backups were stolen wouldn't you? Your music, pictures, videos, uni/school work, documents relating to your career, etc would be gone. No more! If that happened to me, I would want the people who did it to be extrememly hurt!

Hurt, not killed. Besides, if your "precious" data was lost here's an idea to consider now: BACKUP. If my computer was ever stolen here's what I do. 1. Make an insurance claim. 2. Get a new computer. 3. Restore from backup.

That inconvenience and very small cost would make me absolutely angry but it doesn't give me any notion that it's worth taking anyone's life. It gives me the notion that I have to be responsible for the unknowns in life and take precautions.

Yes, you're right. I did, in essence, condone the death penalty for somebody stealing a 50 cent candy bar... however, I also said, a petty theft like that should really only get a very long prison sentence because it is not really causing much misery to anyone. If a person got the death penalty (or got shot) for stealing a 50 cent candy bar, however, that wouldn't bother me, I wouldn't care & I would think that it serves them right, in a way, because they shouldn't steal, even something as little as that.

You said "...but at what cost to society and otherwise good people." Who are the "otherwise good people"? You cannot say burglars & anyone who does another hurtful crime (with intent) good people, can you? Anybody who steals anything in my mind is untrustworthy & evil. They are useless to society, Some person said they feel sorry for people who are "driven to crime & theft". No one is ever driven to crime & theft. It is their choice. If they cannot afford to buy something, then they should find ways, or, they should do what a lot of tramps/bums do & beg - it is better than stealing.

As you can tell, I feel very strongly about stealing & theft, as well as other hurtful crimes like rape, murder, pedophilia, GBH, etc. I'm worried that if somebody robbed my house, they could hurt me, or they could steal sentimental possessions, or they could steal my laptop & back-up hardrive - meaning all of the files & folders I have spent time accumulating & organizing will be gone for good... all my music, all my videos, all my pictures & all my university pictures. A person who does a dreadful crime like that deserves the death penalty in my eyes.

Prison is pointless as it is a waste of tax payers money & people get let out earlier than they should (with many re-offending). Prisons can also be very lenient. I know of one prisoner I was reading about who got a TV & everything. They shouldn't! If prison is that nice to them, they are more likely to re-offend. If anything, they should stay in thier stone cell with a stone toilet & a very uncomfortable bed. The fact that they have offended in that way once before, means they should get the death penalty. It serves them right! Get them off the face of this earth as they are useless to society & some of them have murdered/hurt innocent people.

You say what will the death penalty do to society? Well what does that mean? The only thing it can do is stop people wanting to commit hurtful crimes, can't it? It would be good to society. I mean, I only mean the death penalty should be used in cases where it is 100% proven that the criminal has done the crime -like in this case of robbery. If the homeowner had shot them so they were just injured before the police came, then you would know for sure it was them who did it.

wow. :|

They would not be coming out of your neighbors house with sacks of stoeln items though would they?

There's a special disease of which I can't recall the name that forces people to steal items even when they don't need it. Kleptomania I guess.

What, then?

Anyway,I won't comment, I don't know what exactly happened. But if it was luck that they were burglars, and even worse, criminal ones, then the guy was definitely wrong.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!