Recommended Posts

On the flip side, spawn times that vary from 11 to 30 seconds is just absurd (highest I've hit is 33 seconds) :angry:
It's still a whole lot shorter than Counter-Strike, where you must wait until the end of the round, and CS is one of the most successful online FPSs ever. So having played a lot of CS, I don't mind TF2's default respawn times. I think it makes death more significant and gives a greater reward to a team that succesfully eliminates most of the other team; they get time to act. Otherwise the game would be monotonous, like UT. Defenses would be much harder to breach.

In insta-repawn servers you can observe that. On Goldrush, the blue team will much less likely to succeed.

It's still a whole lot shorter than Counter-Strike, where you must wait until the end of the round, and CS is one of the most successful online FPSs ever. So having played a lot of CS, I don't mind TF2's default respawn times. I think it makes death more significant and gives a greater reward to a team that succesfully eliminates most of the other team; they get time to act. Otherwise the game would be monotonous, like UT. Defenses would be much harder to breach.

In insta-repawn servers you can observe that. On Goldrush, the blue team will much less likely to succeed.

But TF2 and CS:S are two very different types of games. Each round of CS:S is like a sudden death round, while TF2 would utterly suck with no respawning, not with the objectives the game has laid out. Plus there are respawning health and ammo packs, so comparing the two, even in regards to respawn time, is a moot point. You get used to respawning every 5-12 seconds, not 20-30.

And about "they get time to act", as I pointed out, and this happened several times last night, you don't get the chance to react because of the blindsided increase in respawn time that happens almost at the worst time.

It's still a whole lot shorter than Counter-Strike, where you must wait until the end of the round, and CS is one of the most successful online FPSs ever. So having played a lot of CS, I don't mind TF2's default respawn times. I think it makes death more significant and gives a greater reward to a team that succesfully eliminates most of the other team; they get time to act. Otherwise the game would be monotonous, like UT. Defenses would be much harder to breach.

In insta-repawn servers you can observe that. On Goldrush, the blue team will much less likely to succeed.

You also can't compare the game to UT. It's a much different, much faster paced(and much more difficult to really master) game. It doesn't have respawn times because it wouldn't work in most of the game types. In a game like that it would end up becoming "monotonous", as you put it, if it had respawn times. And due to how the speed of the game is those would do the exact opposite. Make it really hard to defend in team gametypes.

But TF2 and CS:S are two very different types of games. Each round of CS:S is like a sudden death round, while TF2 would utterly suck with no respawning, not with the objectives the game has laid out. Plus there are respawning health and ammo packs, so comparing the two, even in regards to respawn time, is a moot point. You get used to respawning every 5-12 seconds, not 20-30.
Seems like you shouldn't get too "used" to respawning every 5-12 seconds, since your respawn time depends on how much time there is left until the next wave, and time between waves depends on a variety of factors too. There is no fixed individual respawn time in TF2. You seem to be saying "20-30 sec respawn times suck because I don't expect them", well, the matter of fact is, the way TF2 is designed, you should expect them from time to time, especially playing on defense. The attacking team gets more frequent respawn waves.

I brought out CS as an example to show that fun, successful gameplay can include much longer respawn times than those found in TF2. Of course, if TF2 was always sudden death, I would go back to CS because that's what it does best.

And about "they get time to act", as I pointed out, and this happened several times last night, you don't get the chance to react because of the blindsided increase in respawn time that happens almost at the worst time.
That's the inevitable corollary of giving a team a reward; the other team is suddenly at a disadvantage. But more balanced gameplay wouldn't be necessarily more fun. If you go through the developper commentary, I think in the Hydro map, they explain that they experimented with constant individual respawn times and it led to static positions and monotonous gameplay. The wave system was designed to make the gameplay less predictable, more dynamic and above all, make people act in teams (because they spawn together).
You also can't compare the game to UT. It's a much different, much faster paced(and much more difficult to really master) game. It doesn't have respawn times because it wouldn't work in most of the game types. In a game like that it would end up becoming "monotonous", as you put it, if it had respawn times. And due to how the speed of the game is those would do the exact opposite. Make it really hard to defend in team gametypes.

Depends really, mastering the game on a public is much easier than mastering it for 6v6 competitive play. Public 20+ slot servers are mainly just spam fests imo.

At the end, we all died :( (Most likely because they had like 6 sentries waiting for us.

:rofl:

If there were no class limits on large pub servers, imagine how nasty things would be with 5+ sentries, 5 snipers, and the rest pyros. :p

I just own with the Sniper now. Man, I love going against other Snipers and owning them. Gotta love it when the enemy team complains of how good of a Sniper you are by saying "Ohh.. it isn't hard to aim and shoot". I always reply with "Well, if it isn't so hard... why do you keep dying?". :rofl:

Depends really, mastering the game on a public is much easier than mastering it for 6v6 competitive play. Public 20+ slot servers are mainly just spam fests imo.

Maybe so. But the vast majority don't do the competitive ladders and junk. Which i don't blame them for. Dealing with the people on ladders like TWL and similar is nothing but a headache, i know(being a former ut2k4 ladder player).

I just own with the Sniper now. Man, I love going against other Snipers and owning them. Gotta love it when the enemy team complains of how good of a Sniper you are by saying "Ohh.. it isn't hard to aim and shoot". I always reply with "Well, if it isn't so hard... why do you keep dying?". :rofl:

As one who's most played class is sniper i have to say.. They do have a point. Most of the classes are slow so it is indeed rather easy to aim and shoot. Even quick zoom and flick-to headshots are rather easy in tf2. And imo sniper vs sniper comes down to luck with the sometimes sketchy hit detection in the source engine.

Most snipers just care about killing other snipers, so it's kind of a waste for both teams. I'm not talking about very good snipers which are incredibly annoying and that I personally deal with by playing a round or two of Scout. They usually switch class after getting owned two or three times.

Meh. It's so annoying. I beat 5 of my previous bests in one life, and my profile stats completely disregard it. Yet it remembers the achievements i also attained in that same life. Why is it so pick and choosy on what it'll take and what it wont..?

Yeah, I used to hate snipers with a fiery passion. Not anymore though, if they start capping me too many times I keep assaulting them by stickying the 2fort battlements, or sticky jumping up there and blowing snipers away. There are many times where I screw up the sticky jump or the snipers quickly retreat to the small spawn door or behind a sentry covering the hayroom spawn door.

If I have to snipe, it's to get back at someone who keeps sniping at me. :shiftyninja:

*glares seven posts up*

Noticed a new Steam Client Beta on the Steam forums, changelog may be of interest to some.

- Added more download regions for Australia

- Fixed several update news links for games going to the wrong page

- Added more information to the game launch display when first-time install steps are being ran

- Several Steamworks updates

- Fixed HL2.exe hanging on shutdown

Link

Maybe so. But the vast majority don't do the competitive ladders and junk. Which i don't blame them for. Dealing with the people on ladders like TWL and similar is nothing but a headache, i know(being a former ut2k4 ladder player).

Well the leagues i've been playing in everyone is fine, I enjoy it a lot :) (ETF2L (European TF2 League), Wireplay 6v6 TF2 League and EnemyDown 6v6 Open Ladder)

Just read those forums, and apparently it is not the same hl2exe error you get when you try to exit out of a game on Steam.

Also, I have an issue where when I quit a game in steam, any game, my desktop is like a third of my screen but basically squished down in size. It is still the correct resolution but squished and flushed to the top left. My desktop and the games are both 1680 x 1050, so definitely a weird issue. Anyone else seen this or heard of it?

I will post a screenshot of my desktop if I can next time it happens. Just annoying as I then have to go into Nvidia control panel and choose the same resolution and hit apply, then all of my desktop icons wind up all in a row instead of where I set them up originally (I put My Computer, Docs, etc. to the right since I was a Mac user first, cannot help it LOL)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!