Recommended Posts

It'll be interesting to see what the unlocks for the sniper are, IMO. I hope the secondary weapon is some sort of variation of its machinegun.

I'm sure it will be. I'm not sure what bonus it would give though, perhaps an alternate gun all together or faster shoot time for the SMG coupled with a lower clip? That way if someone got REALLY close to you, you could just spray and pray, haha. But then again, I guess you can do that anyway.

I just want something a little more effective against spies and such.

They must give us something like that. Because, imagine what will happen with the spy class update. At least 15 people on a 24 players server will be playing spies. That will be the worst update. :(

(Yes, I hate spies. :p)

EDIT: Back on the sniper class update... A gun that doesn't need to recharge (causes the damage that the current gun causes when not recharged) but kills with one shot only when that shot hits the head would bring balance, I think.

The second update, a can of pee, that when thrown damages the enemy's vision/movement/concentration (anything of that), replacing the automatic pistol or the knife would do the trick.

As for the third thing, I have no ideas right now. :)

Edited by KavazovAngel
They must give us something like that. Because, imagine what will happen with the spy class update. At least 15 people on a 24 players server will be playing spies. That will be the worst update. :(

(Yes, I hate spies. :p)

I've played on SimianCage servers pretty-much solidly for months now. They limit how many of each class can be in each round. It's excellent (Y)

Back on the sniper class update... A gun that doesn't need to recharge (causes the damage that the current gun causes when not recharged) but kills with one shot only when that shot hits the head would bring balance, I think.

So basically:

Unscoped: 43-57

Scoped bodyshot: 43-57

Scoped headshot: 450 (constant)

I personally would love that because, as a scout main, 90% of the snipers that kill me do it with bodyshots.....if a sniper can headshot me while I'm moving and jumping around, they deserve the kill, but having a sniper 1-hit bodyshot me with a full charge is just retarded.

Hmmmm....looking at that though.....a current fully charged headshot apparently cant kill a stunned heavy (50% dmg reduction). Anyone try it? I think if thats the case, a scoped fully-charged headshot (on the current sniper rifle) should to as much dmg as a backstab. And then use that value for the new unlock as well (no charge, but much lower bodyshot dmg basically).

That would be ridiculous, its not that hard to hit people in the head, it would mean that heavies, soldiers, demomen, pyro's and medics would just get owned all the time, they would have no chance of attacking because they would get instakilled as soon as a good sniper saw them. A lot of the time I don't kill as sniper just because the charge isn't full enough, eventhough I hit the person in the head. Decent snipers can do quick shots (to kill scouts/snipers/pyro's), so with this weapon it would make it a lot easier, since normally the quick shot will do around 100 damage (headshot), then you have to finish them off, with this idea, you wouldn't have to do any other damage to them.

You don't want updates that make it so people who can't be bothered to get good at a game can be good without using any skill...

The unlockables should be alternatives, not upgrades ;)

I don't think valve would be stupid enough to release that, although they did release the sandman so I'm not confident.

I'm not a fan of the Sandman. Double jumping is too critical, and ingrained in me. Plus force of nature is terrible.

I fully agree, I tried using sandman last night (I absolutely suck at aiming with it) and its stun, though fun, is not worth the loss of double jumping. Hell, I have had one hit nail the guy that was like 20 feet away and it didn't even stun him for some reason. As for the FaN, it has its uses. Its more of an ambush weapon....get in unseen, hit, and get the hell out. it does the damage of 2 shots in the speed it takes the Scattergun to shoot once. Its knockback can also be useful for fighting pyro's or knocking people off the point. That being said, I much prefer the original scattergun, the FaN has a few advantages in very limited situations, the scattergun is in general just better though.

Why are they doing snipers next? I thought they gave updates to the most underused class, and i KNOW that isnt the snipers. God damn servers full of them. Give the spies some love valve.

Every time I have played with a decent spy, they have topped the server. It doesnt matter if their team wins or loses, if the spy is good, they generally top the server. I personally dont think spies need an update, but then again the update SHOULD implement new play styles, not upgrades. So technically, even when they update the spy, they (hopefully) wont be more powerful than they already are. I played a game just last night with pretty balanced teams (my team won with like 45 seconds left) and our top player was a spy with over 100 points, the next closest person to him (on either team) was at like 40-50. So yes, spies are one of the least played, but its because they have a high skill curve....it takes some practice to be a good spy, but once you get there you can turn the tide of a game completely on your own.

I just want something a little more effective against spies and such.

If you're talking about Sniper specifically, that isn't going to happen.

Spy is the Sniper's direct counter-class, and despite that fact I've regularly seen Snipers hear a spy decloak and blat said Spy in 1-2 Kukri hits.

If you're talking about Sniper specifically, that isn't going to happen.

Spy is the Sniper's direct counter-class, and despite that fact I've regularly seen Snipers hear a spy decloak and blat said Spy in 1-2 Kukri hits.

Heavy was a big counter class to scout and look what they did with the scout update... If the spy is decent he will just retreat, or retreat slightly and kill the sniper with the revolver.

Heavy was a big counter class to scout and look what they did with the scout update... If the spy is decent he will just retreat, or retreat slightly and kill the sniper with the revolver.

A decent heavy still rips a scout apart......if a heavy is solo then of course he is going to get owned by the sandman...hell, if a heavy is solo, I will go after him and I do not personally use or like the sandman. Unless the heavy I charge at is good, I can typically solo him given that he has no team-mates around. Heck, sometimes just for fun I jump all around the heavy and bat him to death. :p

So yes, the heavy is a counter to a scout, but a heavy on his own is a stupid heavy that deserves to get killed, and that goes for before the scout update, not just after.

EDIT: PS, most of the time if the heavy is solo and is using the Natascha, he usually still kills me because I cannot jump around and confuse him as easily.....which is exactly what the natascha is good for.

Heavy was a big counter class to scout and look what they did with the scout update... If the spy is decent he will just retreat, or retreat slightly and kill the sniper with the revolver.

The Heavy has never been a good solo class, most of the time he'll just get steamrolled by a edging Demoman or Soldier, Scout or no Scout.

The primary counter to Scout is engineer, as is Pyro to Spy. As should Spy be to Sniper, but as I said, it rarely seems to be the case in my experience.

Why are they doing snipers next? I thought they gave updates to the most underused class, and i KNOW that isnt the snipers. God damn servers full of them. Give the spies some love valve.
Spies aren't the most underplayed class either. I've barely seen a round where there aren't spies on both sides abusing the backstab to rack up high scores they don't really deserve. Sniper being next is well worthy of it. Give a class that requires atleast some skill for the update instead of one that even players who barely play it can do well with(like the spy).

My point is that scouts have two weapons which make it easy to get past heavies, and one means that if you have any back up on your team, even if the heavy has a medic, he will be killed with ease. I don't even play heavy but in my opinion this is just stupid. Also, I didn't say whether it was a heavy or a heavy + medic ;)

And your point about natascha just shows how stupid the sandman update is, the one thing a lone heavy has against a scout has had its usefulness removed since the sandman stops him from slowing you down... Also it sucks generally as a weapon so hardly anyone uses it anymore.

Give a class that requires atleast some skill for the update instead of one that even players who barely play it can do well with(like the spy).

What? Ok, ill admit sniping may take some skill, but 90% of time snipers are ****ing useless, as they are just standing on their bloody battlements in 2fort (or some equivalent in other maps) and dueling with same useless players on the other side in no way helping their team. To be efficient as a spy it takes way more skill (take out sentry nests, get k/d ratios that are higher then 1:1, etc). If you wanna class where people that barely play can do good go pyro. Its pretty much just click-and-turn xD

What? Ok, ill admit sniping may take some skill, but 90% of time snipers are ****ing useless, as they are just standing on their bloody battlements in 2fort (or some equivalent in other maps) and dueling with same useless players on the other side in no way helping their team. To be efficient as a spy it takes way more skill (take out sentry nests, get k/d ratios that are higher then 1:1, etc).

In the very rare cases I play 2fort I always see snipers topping the team at the end of the round. Don't know if that makes them any good however.

If you wanna class where people that barely play can do good go pyro. Its pretty much just click-and-turn xD

I believe the current TF2 gaming term is W+m1 :p

Just started playing this game yesterday, bought it with the Orange Box (and Half-Life 1, I want to check that series out). My Steam account is alexsuraci. I suck at the moment but I'll get better. ;)

Re: Snipers being useless at 2fort, I completely agree, having played a sniper there and seen 2-3 snipers across the way going after no one but myself. Although I did kill folks who hopped on top of the bridge, when I could.

Played a few rounds of ctf_well yesterday, me and a heavy ended up camping our own intel for 3 solid rounds since nobody else on the team cared about defence (apart from an engineer in the second round).

It was pretty funny, drove the other team's spies nuts, they were good sports though and could see the funny side (especially when I was backstabbed while standing on the intel by the spy who had been waiting next to our dispenser for about 3 minutes, we all found that funny)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!