Recommended Posts

Hah I've seen them on a few servers I play on. What servers do you reg on Spookie? :)

favs.jpg

Though trickery.net is my regular server since I helped contribute to it and the guys who helped pay for it with me are regulars from CS beta days and the old i lans. So we don't play to be competitive we just play because we enjoy the game. :)

Does anyone know any decent maxplayer/no time limit servers such as saigns ones? Seems they've reverted back to 24 players and I can't get a decent connection regularly.

Saigns servers are a disaster. Lots of "premium" cheaters there. I can't really understand why you play there. :)

Try UKCS, I've found them to be the best European servers. Lots of friendly people. :wub:

I kinda hate scramble. I play with friends that I like. I want to win (hopefully dominate) and lose with them. That is where PC largely fails. It is hard to be play and keep the same team.

Scramble is better than the autobalance system TF2 uses. I hate being on a team, giving my life to do something important, then being switched because I decided suiciding to help my team was worth it. 99% of the time if I am autobalanced, I will jump in spectator and go back to the team I was on, scramble, however, I generally stay on the team I am put on (but vote scramble never freaking works cause most servers have it set for over 50%, which is almost never going to happen because the winning team usually consists of at least 50% of the players, and most of them do not want their stacked team to be scrambled).

What makes things bad though, is when you get 1 or 2 really good people on a team who work together, and they end up dominating the other team while the rest of their team mates are fairly matched against the enemy team. That gets complaints of stacking and votes for scrambling when in reality its just 2 people working together dominating the enemy team (2-3 well coordinated people can dominate 5-6 uncoordinated people). I mean hell, SPUF had a competitive vs pub, I think it was 6 vs 9, and the pub players were all decent players for pub games, but they got dominated by the smaller competitive team.

Here we go: http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?p=14856077

Basically, out of 8 rounds of 6 vs 9, the pubbers (9) only won 2 rounds, despite outnumbering the pros by 50%.

I wish the autobalance system took the score into account, so if one team is doing shocking and the other team has 2-3 high scoring players, it would move players around to provide a more equal score.

Of course, it'd have to be slanted against the teams based on map objectives, on an attack/defend map the blu team should be favoured for higher scoring players.

Edit: Oh yeah, it'd have to take the class into account too, somebody who's high scoring while playing a defensive class on defence, shouldn't be put onto an offensive team.

Or whatever, I don't know.

I wish the autobalance system took the score into account, so if one team is doing shocking and the other team has 2-3 high scoring players, it would move players around to provide a more equal score.

Of course, it'd have to be slanted against the teams based on map objectives, on an attack/defend map the blu team should be favoured for higher scoring players.

Edit: Oh yeah, it'd have to take the class into account too, somebody who's high scoring while playing a defensive class on defence, shouldn't be put onto an offensive team.

Or whatever, I don't know.

I completely agree, thats how autobalance should be done. Average out the score of the players on each team, the find the best player to move from one team to another to even out the score as best as possible. Obviously the elitists who like dominating the enemy team on their own and what not will not enjoy it, and there will need to be some form of rules (no moving engies over when they have a nest setup, etc), and I admit that score is not the best identifier of skill (teamwork in TF2 is more effective than individual score). But generally if the higher the score the more someone is impairing the enemy team, meaning if they are switched the team with less players will gain someone who can potentially help holding off the team that had more players, while the team that had more players will lose part of their offensive.

I think it's fairly difficult to get a scramble system that works well under most scenarios, as there are a lot of variables. Personally I'm like you Nagisan, if I get auto-balanced I normally jump into spectator and wait for the auto-balance to kick in again so I can move back. Normally that's because I prefer to push on PL maps rather than defend, and I'm usually playing with friends.

What I've noticed is that a lot of the time, from a skill point of view the teams aren't that bad, it's just that there's a complete class fail on the losing team. Three engineers whilst trying to push, multiple snipers who can't hit a barn door, and other fail combinations. Class limits help, but it doesn't solve the main problem, which is that too many players in one team don't play classes that help their team.

That's a biggie... Class Fail.

My absolute favorite class is my Kamikaze Pyro. I like

to disrupt the opposing team with my fearless fire

charges. But at the same time, some maps are just not

designed for it and so I have to switch to one of the lesser

classes in order to actually help my team.

That's a biggie... Class Fail.

My absolute favorite class is my Kamikaze Pyro. I like

to disrupt the opposing team with my fearless fire

charges. But at the same time, some maps are just not

designed for it and so I have to switch to one of the lesser

classes in order to actually help my team.

I know how you feel, I love playing scout and can generally hold my own as a scout, but it just doesn't feel like I am helping my team much when I play scout. Instead, I often end up switching to soldier and leading pushes, or going Demo to clear a few sentries my incompetent team has not cleared, or sometimes even medic to help build up ubers on those maps that force you to use ubers to get past certain points (Junction, Dustbowl, etc...aka the crappy maps).

I just love the speed and mobility of the scout, and as mentioned I can generally hold my own against other players, but most of the time I get stuck on the incompetent teams and I either play scout and contribute to the crappiness of my team, or I go soldier and help my team win, my want for being on a halfway decent team generally outweighs my want to have fun for some reason (mostly because when I get stuck on the crappy team, the other team steamrolls us and makes it impossible for me to do anything as scout, and thus, I have no fun).

Happy Birthday TF2!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1R-a_9lMZs

Not my video just something I found cool that Valve did :p

I had fun playing with the ball, as did everyone else on the server I play on :p

This is why I hate playing on random servers:

taken a few minutes after a vote to scrabble failed. :/

Stacked teams in TF2? Yep, that's normal and a flaw from letting people choose their teams. Forcing random team assignment like most other games in existence would help alleviate it somewhat. But valve seems to like to avoid an obvious way to improve the game in that regard.

New Soldier hat and Holy Hand Gernades (cant use them) if you pre-purchase Worms Reloaded. I like Worms but I dont see myself paying $20 (well $17 pre-purchase) for the game. Seems like Valve will be tossing TF2 hats to help sales for other games.

I had fun playing with the ball, as did everyone else on the server I play on :p

Where can you see that ball? nevermind, just joined and found one lying around. :)

(and happy birthday TF2! :D)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • If someone chooses to continue using SB and therefore goes through the manual intervention in the thread, afterwards the BSOD problem is gone. Whether they then re-enable the task doesn't matter, they're done, though on such machines it might pay to keep it disabled in case the next update (if there is a next) causes the same problem. OTOH, if someone disables SB in the BIOS, the problem is also gone. Incidentally, I noticed that this task exists even on machines that don't support SB. It's just installed across the board...and runs. Doing what on such machines is a little hazy.
    • qBittorrent 5.2.2 by Razvan Serea The qBittorrent project aims to provide a Free Software alternative to µtorrent. qBittorrent is an advanced and multi-platform BitTorrent client with a nice user interface as well as a Web UI for remote control and an integrated search engine. qBittorrent aims to meet the needs of most users while using as little CPU and memory as possible. qBittorrent is a truly Open Source project, and as such, anyone can and should contribute to it. qBittorrent features: Polished µTorrent-like User Interface Well-integrated and extensible Search Engine Simultaneous search in most famous BitTorrent search sites Per-category-specific search requests (e.g. Books, Music, Movies) All Bittorrent extensions DHT, Peer Exchange, Full encryption, Magnet/BitComet URIs, ... Remote control through a Web user interface Nearly identical to the regular UI, all in Ajax Advanced control over trackers, peers and torrents Torrents queueing and prioritizing Torrent content selection and prioritizing UPnP / NAT-PMP port forwarding support Available in ~25 languages (Unicode support) Torrent creation tool Advanced RSS support with download filters (inc. regex) Bandwidth scheduler IP Filtering (eMule and PeerGuardian compatible) IPv6 compliant Available on most platforms: Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, OS/2, FreeBSD qBittorrent 5.2.2 changelog: FEATURE: Use D-Bus to show file in file managers (Chocobo1) #24340 BUGFIX: Fix friendlyUnitCompact precision calculation (vafada) #24323 BUGFIX: Remove all top-level folders (glassez) #24333 BUGFIX: Use proper API for checking exit status (Chocobo1) #24349 BUGFIX: Delete stale lockfile when hostname mismatch (TurboTheTurtle, glassez) #24363 BUGFIX: Fix wrong removal procedure of watched folder paths (Chocobo1) #24413 BUGFIX: Don't reannounce before interface changes are applied (glassez) #24447 BUGFIX: Use Latin script for Bosnian locale name (Andy Ye) #24342 WEBUI: Fix performance of global checkbox toggling (tehcneko) #24316 WEBUI: Fix Safari transfer list header misalignment (Piccirello) #24377 WEBUI: Fix error when submitting magnet before metadata loads (Piccirello) #24378 WEBUI: Use correct row id when updating Rss Downloader feed selection (Chocobo1) #24402 WEBUI: Use SameSite=Lax for session cookie to fix cross-site login (Piccirello) #24422 WEBUI: Bring back properties panel expand/collapse button (vafada) #24430 WEBAPI: Only use X-Forwarded-Host header when reverse proxy support is enabled (Chocobo1) #24457 RSSS: Fix "RSS Smart Episode Filter" RegEx (nathanon-akk, glassez) #24398 RSS: Fix previously matched episode format (glassez) #24452 WINDOWS: Fix Python fallback search path (TurboTheTurtle) #24325 WINDOWS: NSIS: Allow to install x64 binary on ARM64 (Chocobo1) #24358 Download: qBittorrent 5.2.2 | 41.1 MB (Open Source) Download: qBittorrent 64-bit installer (qt6) | 43.6 MB Links: qBittorrent Home page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Weechat. https://weechat.org/
    • they should stop making bad games that no one asked for
  • Recent Achievements

    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
    • Reacting Well
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Cosminus earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      126
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!