manaully set ddr2 timing in bios ?


Recommended Posts

i was reading about my ocz ddr2 ram and it's timings. it says it's suppose to be at 4-4-4-15 and 1.9v - 2.1v .

i was looking in my dfi lanparty boards bios and i see the voltage is set at 1.925v and can be adjusted if need be.

pretty much everything else is set to auto and iwant to check to make sure my ram is running at the 4-4-4-15 timing. is there a way to check this and adjust it if need be ? there are a ton of setting in my bios to overclock. i checked the manual and it doesn't state how to manually check the rams timing.

thanks in advance.

Edited by smooth3006
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/647262-manaully-set-ddr2-timing-in-bios/
Share on other sites

CPU-z will tell you what timings the RAM is running at.

http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php

okay according to cpuz the timing is set at 5-5-5-15 ? if that's correct would you recommend changing the timing to what ocz says to 4-4-4-15 ?

whats the difference ? i just don't want to ruin the memory.

post-157820-1215229757_thumb.jpg

Directly quoted from Wikipedia.org

CL = CAS Latency time: The time it takes between a command having been sent to the memory and when it begins to reply to it. It is the time it takes between the processor asking for some data from the memory and it returning it.

TRCD = DRAM RAS# to CAS# Delay: The number of clock cycles performed between activating the Row Access Strobe and the Column Access Strobe. This parameter relates to the time it takes to access stored data.

TRP = DRAM RAS# Precharge: The amount of time between the 'precharge' command and the 'active' command. The 'precharge' command closes memory that was accessed and the 'active' command signifies that a new read/write cycle can begin.

TRAS = Active to Precharge delay: The total time that will elapse between an active state and precharge state. This is the sum of the previous timings: CL + TRCD + TRP.

The BIOS on a PC may allow the user to make adjustments to RAM Timing in an effort to increase speed (with possible risk of decreased stability) or, in some cases, increase stability (by lowering the speed).

i searched the official OCZ forums and they recommend the change to 4-4-4-15 and bump the voltage up to 2.1 from 1.9 for better stability. i did this and i immediately noticed a speed increase on my boot time and overall speed. what i don't understand is why the bios doesn't automatically recognize the manufacturer timings / voltages and such ? :blink:

the bios isnt written for certain ddr manufacturers. It should be able to use all manufacturers, but thats not always the case. they use the lowest setting to allow many types of ram to work.

the bios isnt written for certain ddr manufacturers. It should be able to use all manufacturers, but thats not always the case. they use the lowest setting to allow many types of ram to work.

yeah thanks for the reply. i know the ram is rated at between 1.9v - 2.1v. i should be ok by setting it to the max voltage, right ? i just wish things would sort of work "out of the box" you know ? all this time ive had this ram and i just found out it wasn't running at the OCZ manufacturer specs. no wonder i wasn't noticing any speed improvement until now.

man ive been reading online and i see so many different responses as far as this memory goes with timing / voltage. just so you guys fully understand i am not at this time overclocking my system at all. ive had this memory since september 07' and i guess it has always run at 1.925v and at the timing of 5-5-5-15 with no issues. i just found out yesterday that this ram was meant to run at a different timing / higher voltage. i just want to clarify that running it now at 4-4-4-15 and at 2.1v is ok and won't damage my system at all becuase if it will ill just go back to my old settings.

not to be rude but i can't believe i can't get any assistance on this issue ? ive posted this topic on 3 different forums with no good responses. even the official ocz forums are useless. im sorry if i seem to be an idiot here, but im new to this stuff.

once again i need to know if running this ram at 4-4-4-15 at 2.1v will fry it or not ? the reason i keep asking is i have seen people on other forums say they ran this ram at different timings and voltages. im not much of an overclocker and i don't wish to push the ram to it's limits either. im just looking for stable / stock performance.

It won't damage the ram if that's what it's rated to run at.

well it's rated at between 1.9v -2.1v. i have been told the lower i can get the voltage the cooler the ram will run. i set it back to 2.0v and i will run memtest for awhile to see if i get any errors. if i don't i will try to lower it down to 1.9v.

Mine is rated at 1.8-2.1v if I want to use the EPP profile for my ram (which is what it is sold as) I had to manually set it to the specs 4-4-3-5 2.1v in the BIOS.

And yes, more voltage= more heat. So if you can get it stable at a lower voltage thats great, but if the specs you provided earlier are correct there is nothing to be worried about running them at 2.1v

When the timings are set to Auto in the BIOS it uses the timings stored on the SPD. You can check this information under the SPD tab in CPU-z. For some reason a lot of manufacturers seem to store higher timings than what they are rated for according to their own specs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!