Recommended Posts

The sidebar is a joke, just to make ppl excitied bout vista when it first came out they couldnt think of anything new so they decided to add sidebar, first why do u need a clock on sidebar after years almost 20 years using windows i always look in the corner were the clock is why look on sidebar, half the stuff that came with sidebar is also useless as u want need it, firstly it also gets info from ametuer sites...tut tut. Man didnt see the sidebar like this since today but yeh i turned it of after a week or 2 no point to it

Sad but true. Faulty drivers/lack of drivers/drivers with limited features are always blamed on the OS.

Meh. He said the developers weren't getting off their butts. A little different to call developers lazy than saying that the OS had limitations.

The sidebar is a joke, just to make ppl excitied bout vista when it first came out they couldnt think of anything new so they decided to add sidebar, first why do u need a clock on sidebar after years almost 20 years using windows i always look in the corner were the clock is why look on sidebar, half the stuff that came with sidebar is also useless as u want need it, firstly it also gets info from ametuer sites...tut tut. Man didnt see the sidebar like this since today but yeh i turned it of after a week or 2 no point to it

I find them quite useful. Especially the weather, stock price, seattle traffic, sticky notes, and of course my indexer status gadget. I also have the RSS gadget set up to show me when new downloads of my favorite shows are available.

He seems to do that quite a lot. Write an article which basically says I'll be writing this later....

And yet this thread has already has a second page*, heh.

(where page = 25 posts)

Meh. He said the developers weren't getting off their butts. A little different to call developers lazy than saying that the OS had limitations.

That's not what I meant, I didn't even mention "OS limitations". LOL

All I'm trying to say is: when a piece of hardware(software too btw.) doesn't work, they always blame the wrong "x". (x can be anything from windows to microsoft to windows devs and linux to linux devs and even OSX/OSX devs if something doesn't work on their hacked OSx86 machine.) Instead of blaming the company that made the piece of hardware and doesn't release decent drivers for it or cross-platform drivers.

Last I heard, the Sidebar was turned in to part of Live, then just scrapped entirely. I don't know what happened to the team after that - the Shell team looks like a logical place for them to go, though I don't know what they're working on (if they've not just been integrated in to the various teams already in the shell team).

Apparently, someone pretty high up in the company had a lot of enthusiasm for the Sidebar, which is why they didn't scrap it pre-launch. A lot of people didn't even want it shipped in RTM.

I'm using OSX as my primary OS now, and I don't even use Dashboard that much. The dock icons are much more useful - for example, my torrent application (for catching up on those Linux builds, you know?) has download speed overlaid on its dock icon. Mail.App has unread message count overlaid on its icon. It's much more useful, and that seems to be the route Microsoft is taking as well - if recent taskbar screenshots are anything to go by. That said, it's a just a contextual service for applications - an entirely different philosophy from the Sidebar, which was meant to aggregate online services in to one place on the desktop.

From what I have been told and from what I have seen in the screen captures that have been floating around on Google, the Windows Sidebar has been integrated directly into the shell (Windows Explorer) and is no longer a separate entity, which in my opinion is a good move because now that it is part of the shell there should be more underlying APIs being developed for this next generation which can be exposed by gadget developers.

Right now, Windows Sidebar 1.0 (in Windows Vista) is flawed because of the lack of APIs (yes, you can hook in with .NET if you know what you are doing, but let's pretend you are an average Joe User and you want to make your own sidebar gadget). With more APIs exposed to potential developers and better tools (let's see some love for Gagdets in the next release of Visual Studio), I think that the ecosystem for Windows Sidebar gadgets would be richer, more robust, and most importantly more useful.

Blah blah blah...give them time jebus.

Give them time? What I described was exactly what Vista was supposed to be way back when, and I think they've had more than enough time to get it right by now. All the features they slashed from Vista were my reasons for wanting it in the first place. Don't get me wrong, I love Vista and am using it on the two computers I have that can run it, but the only reason I own them is because 1 copy came with my Laptop and the other I got when I built my first computer and it was actually cheaper to buy Vista than XP. I'm all the time defending Vista, but when it comes right down to it, there aren't enough new features to have made me want to upgrade had I already owned an XP license.

My point is that Microsoft needs to do something drastic with the next release of Windows, and the fact that they're just building off of Vista at the moment seems troubling to me (actually, the very soon-ish release is what makes that *really* troubling). I haven't seen plans for that 3D interface I mentioned since way back before XP was released, but I thought it was a novel idea, given current graphics card availability and capability. Operating systems need to evolve with the equipment they are running on, and while the business sector doesn't care for a resource intensive 3D interface, the consumer(and I specifically mentioned "consumer" for a reason in my original post) aka home user might want something... different, and better organized, and yes, full of eye candy. Might as well do something with those beefy machines we all own.

Given the flak Vista has received for being not different enough from XP, I thought people would be on board with me in saying they shouldn't repeat that mistake twice.

But I guess I would be okay with a Vista add-on if it actually *did* include all the features Vista was supposed to have in the first place. The dedicated gaming mode was probably my most wanted feature, although now that I own a computer capable enough for the time being, I don't see too much of a need. Still, it would be nice to have nothing bogging your computer down when you're gaming in those more graphic-intensive games.

The Sidebar will be removed; they don't even have a Sidebar team anymore. Not since launch.

I hope the functionality of sidebar will be in the redesigned taskbar (Y) Makes more sense to me.

I wonder how many people actually use the sidebar? I haven't. I turned it off the day I installed Vista. I just can't find a use for it.

I use sidebar but find it takes up too much screen space. Got an Gadget showing my internet usage, network traffic, cpu usage and a clock.

But it more like a gimmick than something really useful. Needs redesign.

Apparently, someone pretty high up in the company had a lot of enthusiasm for the Sidebar, which is why they didn't scrap it pre-launch. A lot of people didn't even want it shipped in RTM.

He has a name. Jim Allchin ;)

sidebar needs to be brought back to the level it was in the Longhorn beta (part of the shell and could be "merged" with the taskbar

and Aero being out is good news too, it looks cool for a bit but isn't very usable

Right. Just like how 'gadgets' work in Ubuntu ( my second fav OS :heart: ), this way the information they show is informative but not bloated in screen real-estate.

Hook it from .Net? I don't think so, you'll need native code for that.

My indexer status gadget uses a .NET control. While it could be problematic if you loaded another .NET gadget that used the .NET 1.x framework, and that one got loaded first, I haven't found this to be a likely scenario.

On the brighter side, it makes it easy to have automatic support for both 32-bit and 64-bit versions with one binary.

Right now, Windows Sidebar 1.0 (in Windows Vista) is flawed because of the lack of APIs (yes, you can hook in with .NET if you know what you are doing, but let's pretend you are an average Joe User and you want to make your own sidebar gadget). With more APIs exposed to potential developers and better tools (let's see some love for Gagdets in the next release of Visual Studio), I think that the ecosystem for Windows Sidebar gadgets would be richer, more robust, and most importantly more useful.

Eh, you can do quite a lot from just JScript / VBScript. Quite a lot of system APIs (and application APIs) are useable from script via COM / IDispatch / ActiveX.

I wonder how many people actually use the sidebar? I haven't. I turned it off the day I installed Vista. I just can't find a use for it.

I also keep it off. In fact the only time I'd think of using the sidebar is using Brandon Live's search gadget to force the indexer to index at highest priority. The sidebar performs sluggishly and takes ages to start up on a fresh Vista install.

If they do bring back Sidebar in Windows 7 it better take advantage of something like WPF instead of being a fancy mini-webpage.

sidebar needs to be brought back to the level it was in the Longhorn beta (part of the shell and could be "merged" with the taskbar

and Aero being out is good news too, it looks cool for a bit but isn't very usable

Aero isn't going anywhere. The article mentioned some modifications to it. Aero is actually very usable, as it does improve performance of your system by offloading the entire UI rendering to the GPU instead of the CPU.

I dont think the CPU gadget is even accurate. Try using CPUz

Um, what? The CPU gadget reports what the current utilization of the CPU is. CPUz is a system information tool.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!