• 0

NOD32 or Kaspersky?


  

195 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Anti-Virus should I use?

    • Kaspersky
      62
    • NOD32
      133


Question

Hey all,

I've been wanting to change my Anti-Virus for a long time now, and am wondering whether I should go for NOD32 and Kaspersky?

I'm currently using AVG Free, and am pretty much satisfied with it, but want to go in for more security by purchasing a full version of either. I've been doing a bit of research online about whether I should go for NOD32 or Kaspersky, and after a lot of looking around on different forums and statistics, I'm still undecided about the same.

People claim NOD32 as a light/fast and effective anti-virus, while Kaspersky boasts about its higher detection and removal rate. Some figures show that NOD32 has better detection rate. Seriously confusing.

I looked up the NeoWin 2008 Best Antivirus statistics and NOD32 wins hands down, with 400+ votes while Kaspersky has 150+.

It would be much appreciated if anyone could help me make the right choice. My main priority is to have maximum detection and removal rate, looking for total security.

Btw, how does bitdefender compare to them?

Regards,

Sibot

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/647662-nod32-or-kaspersky/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I used kaspersky 7 before on vista, and it slowed down my laptop. My laptop isnt anything great, an old 1.66 GHz Core duo (the first generation T2300). So, it really felt slow. I have 2GB of ram. I tried NOD32 and it worked really well, and it doesnt even feel like there's an antivirus installed! I dont care how much RAM it takes, just not CPU cycles. So, finally I purchased NOD32 with a student discount. Very good, and I would recommend it to anybody.

Also, NOD32 has never failed to detect viruses, except that 1 month ago (i think), it flagged Acrobat, Nero as "Unknown Trojan". It was a false positive, but because i deleted the files, i had to reinstall Acrobat and Nero. A fix was later posted on NOD's website later.

  • 0
I have used both on my PC's. Lately I have found Kaspersky AV 2009 to impact on Windows performance and even be the cause of BSOD's, which has really disappointed me.

Overall I find NOD32 (3.0) lighter, and less likely to cause problems. NOD32 also an has excellent track record with 50 VB passes (Y)

I'm using Kaspersky for abt 5 years alrdy and nvr encountered any prob. Btw, which version of KAV 2009 are you using? 8.0.0.357 (a.b)? if you are using the final version + non modified /cracked one, i think it should not cause any prob.

I admit kaspersky is taking more resources than NOD32. But for the security n protection, kaspersky is better :), go for Kaspersky Internet Security rather than Kaspersky Anvitirus.

If u r normal user, seldom download files from torrent or rapidshare, u can go for NOD32 for the better performance.

If u r the advanced user who always download files from torrent, rapidshare or visit xxx or hacking website, u better use Kaspersky for the better protection :). If u can customize KIS settings such as registry , u can see tt KIS is more powerful :)

hohoho...

rgrds,

dozty

  • 0
I am (was) an reseller for nod32, version 2.7 was amazing but the new versions of 3 have been terrible when used in a network environment. it has caused so much trouble that I will no longer sell it to my customers.

I am now looking at kaspersky toreplace it.

NOD32 (3.0) has been working quite well for me in a home environment. It wasn't a perfect product when it first was released but it's good now.

I'm using Kaspersky for abt 5 years alrdy and nvr encountered any prob. Btw, which version of KAV 2009 are you using? 8.0.0.357 (a.b)? if you are using the final version + non modified /cracked one, i think it should not cause any prob.

I admit kaspersky is taking more resources than NOD32. But for the security n protection, kaspersky is better :), go for Kaspersky Internet Security rather than Kaspersky Anvitirus.

If u r normal user, seldom download files from torrent or rapidshare, u can go for NOD32 for the better performance.

If u r the advanced user who always download files from torrent, rapidshare or visit xxx or hacking website, u better use Kaspersky for the better protection :). If u can customize KIS settings such as registry , u can see tt KIS is more powerful :)

hohoho...

rgrds,

dozty

There's a lot of people in Kaspersky Forums that would disagree with you about Kaspersky right now.

Now, I've been a Kaspersky user for years, but with Version 8, something is very wrong with their product.

  • 0
NOD32 (3.0) has been working quite well for me in a home environment. It wasn't a perfect product when it first was released but it's good now.

There's a lot of people in Kaspersky Forums that would disagree with you about Kaspersky right now.

Now, I've been a Kaspersky user for years, but with Version 8, something is very wrong with their product.

^^ yup KIS 7 is much better, m still using KIS 7 :). I couldnt find some functions and it couldnt solve IP to Hostname :(

  • 0

I've always been a big fan of Kaspersky and would recommend that. Over the weekend i had to sort out my cousin's computer who managed to get some spyware and a virus installed. He had Nod32 on his system so i did a scan and it found the virus but it wouldn't remove it. I downloaded KAV in the end which managed to get rid of it.

  • 0

Hey all!

Thank you everyone for all the help!

I checked out the AV comparatives report for May 2008, you can see it here (PDF) and according to the reports an Anti Virus called Avira is the best out there, with the highest detection rates, 76% while

Kaspersky is at 21% and

NOD32 at 57%.

Surprisingly that contradicts the notion that Kaspersky has higher detection rates than most antiviruses out there.

Is anyone using Avira? Or can provide me with some feedback on it, it'd be much appreciated.

Thanks for all the help!

Regards,

Sibot

  • 0
Hey all!

Thank you everyone for all the help!

I checked out the AV comparatives report for May 2008, you can see it here (PDF) and according to the reports an Anti Virus called Avira is the best out there, with the highest detection rates, 76% while

Kaspersky is at 21% and

NOD32 at 57%.

Surprisingly that contradicts the notion that Kaspersky has higher detection rates than most antiviruses out there.

Is anyone using Avira? Or can provide me with some feedback on it, it'd be much appreciated.

Thanks for all the help!

Regards,

Sibot

It is awesome software, and not nearly talked about enough, and the anti virus portion is free, go try it.

  • 0
i would try threatfire and it is free and offers realtime behavior protection and you can run a manual antivirus scan with it,i found with nod it doesent find much but kaspersky works better at finding things but with kaspersky an older game i play it kaspersky causes it to hang a bit but nod has no problem and you could try the free kaspersky removal tool that dexter suggested,if your very careful with what you do you dont need real time av protection but a behavior based one should do.

+1

but i wish they make x64 bit installer so i can run it on my 64bit system

  • 0

I just switched from nod32 to avira antivir just because of the higher detection removal rate of viruses, i did a full system scan with both antivirus scanners last week and nod32 missed a couple, avira managed to catch the ones nod32 missed, so thats what made me switch...and nod32 has been a favorite of mine for a very long time....but avira is just superior imho....i also customized avira to set updates to invisible and I've got the update nag screen hidden...so everything runs silently in the background... anyways the free version fits me perfectly...and i recommend it....ive also installed it on 5 computers this week...so im telling everyone i know about this wonderful free antivirus..n if you dont like the red little umbrella icon you can click on customize notification icons and set it to hide ;)

  • 0

The ultimate $64,000 av question.

It's totally a personal preference here. I prefer KAV.

That Antivir is crap!! Been playing with a free av from Comodo, http://antivirus.comodo.com/. Seems alright and updates VERY fast, unlike Antivir. Also able to disable everything including real time, which I dislike, but still able to right click and scan without opening the whole program.

  • 0
Hey all!

Thank you everyone for all the help!

I checked out the AV comparatives report for May 2008, you can see it here (PDF) and according to the reports an Anti Virus called Avira is the best out there, with the highest detection rates, 76% while

Kaspersky is at 21% and

NOD32 at 57%.

Surprisingly that contradicts the notion that Kaspersky has higher detection rates than most antiviruses out there.

Is anyone using Avira? Or can provide me with some feedback on it, it'd be much appreciated.

Thanks for all the help!

Regards,

Sibot

That test is testing for proactive testing, how well it can detect new malware without signature updates, not total detection.

Avira is probably the current top in my opinion with good heuristics and signature detection. However, it does seem to be a little more likely to have false-positives than most.

Should be fine with any of the top AVs, differences aren't that big in reality.

Edited by RootWind
  • 0
That Antivir is crap!! Been playing with a free av from Comodo, http://antivirus.comodo.com/. Seems alright and updates VERY fast, unlike Antivir. Also able to disable everything including real time, which I dislike, but still able to right click and scan without opening the whole program.

:laugh: Right. Sorry *wipes tears* :laugh: So a product with great detection and amazing Proactive and On-Demand detection is Crap?

NOD32 has less resource usage than KAV and rocks at all...

(However, a resident virus guard is useless, it's enough to check finished downloads...)

jm2c

NOD32 (3.0) also doesn't cause BSOD's that are blamed on KAV/KIS 2009, all the while Kaspersky denies it's their problem or is clueless to resolve.

  • 0

^ It's already set to that, but it always fails on files which can be perfectly cleaned (Eg: .html, .doc, etc)

Fair enough, I'll be honest I've never really needed to use it. I can't say I've had too many infected files that've needed cleaning before.

mm, when i tried ESS i only had option of daily updates, do they actually have hourly ones?

Haha, k, well maybe they are daily, but that's a good enough job in my books. It's fast, and it updates silently without bothering me, so I like it.

  • 0

Hey all,

Thanks again for all the help. I tried installing Avira AntiVirus the free version, and it was working pretty good till I started noticing slow down in booting the OS.

Worst was when I started getting BSOD's, it has NEVER...i say NEVER happened before. For the first time I got BSOD, I ignored it, the 2nd time I got it, I knew it must've been Avira causing them. I uninstalled it and now my system is running perfectly fine.

Seems like I'll have to settle for Kaspersky or NOD32. Will post an update as soon as I get one.

Thanks again everyone!

Appreciate the help!

Regards,

Sibot

  • 0
Hey all,

Thanks again for all the help. I tried installing Avira AntiVirus the free version, and it was working pretty good till I started noticing slow down in booting the OS.

Worst was when I started getting BSOD's, it has NEVER...i say NEVER happened before. For the first time I got BSOD, I ignored it, the 2nd time I got it, I knew it must've been Avira causing them. I uninstalled it and now my system is running perfectly fine.

Seems like I'll have to settle for Kaspersky or NOD32. Will post an update as soon as I get one.

Thanks again everyone!

Appreciate the help!

Regards,

Sibot

I don't think I have ever seen Avira cause BSOD, more likely it's a driver or hardware fault.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Chrome 149.0.7827.156 (offline installer) by Razvan Serea The web browser is arguably the most important piece of software on your computer. You spend much of your time online inside a browser: when you search, chat, email, shop, bank, read the news, and watch videos online, you often do all this using a browser. Google Chrome is a browser that combines a minimal design with sophisticated technology to make the web faster, safer, and easier. Use one box for everything--type in the address bar and get suggestions for both search and Web pages. Thumbnails of your top sites let you access your favorite pages instantly with lightning speed from any new tab. Desktop shortcuts allow you to launch your favorite Web apps straight from your desktop. Chrome has many useful features built in, including automatic full-page translation and access to thousands of apps, extensions, and themes from the Chrome Web Store. Google Chrome is one of the best solutions for Internet browsing giving you high level of security, speed and great features. This update includes 33 security fixes. [N/A][516496659] Critical CVE-2026-12437: Use after free in WebShare. Reported by Google on 2026-05-25 [N/A][516947912] Critical CVE-2026-12438: Inappropriate implementation in WebView. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][519728275] Critical CVE-2026-12439: Use after free in Digital Credentials. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][519731619] Critical CVE-2026-12440: Use after free in DigitalCredentials. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][520157118] Critical CVE-2026-12441: Use after free in File Input. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][521950423] Critical CVE-2026-12442: Use after free in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-06-09 [N/A][522566295] Critical CVE-2026-12443: Use after free in Web Authentication. Reported by Google on 2026-06-11 [N/A][513160088] High CVE-2026-12444: Out of bounds read in Chromoting. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513199795] High CVE-2026-12445: Use after free in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513313107] High CVE-2026-12446: Insufficient data validation in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513405023] High CVE-2026-12447: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][513458233] High CVE-2026-12448: Inappropriate implementation in WebView. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][513480539] High CVE-2026-12449: Use after free in Chromoting. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][514531776] High CVE-2026-12450: Inappropriate implementation in Media. Reported by Zhixin Tu on 2026-05-19 [N/A][514741076] High CVE-2026-12451: Use after free in DigitalCredentials. Reported by Google on 2026-05-19 [N/A][515462244] High CVE-2026-12452: Use after free in Downloads. Reported by Google on 2026-05-21 [N/A][516448843] High CVE-2026-12453: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Input. Reported by Google on 2026-05-25 [N/A][516926968] High CVE-2026-12454: Race in Safe Browsing. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517069848] High CVE-2026-12455: Use after free in Tab Strip. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517124587] High CVE-2026-12456: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517153117] High CVE-2026-12457: Insufficient data validation in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517258337] High CVE-2026-12458: Incorrect security UI in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517406035] High CVE-2026-12459: Inappropriate implementation in Serial. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28 [N/A][517484284] High CVE-2026-12460: Insufficient policy enforcement in File System Access. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28 [N/A][517727318] High CVE-2026-12461: Out of bounds read in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-05-29 [N/A][517916024] High CVE-2026-12462: Use after free in Media. Reported by Google on 2026-05-29 [N/A][518042749] High CVE-2026-12463: Inappropriate implementation in Views. Reported by Google on 2026-05-30 [N/A][519358344] High CVE-2026-12464: Use after free in Browser. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][520189702] High CVE-2026-12465: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Metrics. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][520199394] High CVE-2026-12466: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][520202726] High CVE-2026-12467: Use after free in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][521485244] High CVE-2026-12468: Inappropriate implementation in Updater. Reported by Google on 2026-06-08 [N/A][521618871] High CVE-2026-12469: Uninitialized Use in GPU. Reported by Google on 2026-06-09 Important to know! The offline installer links do not include the automatic update feature. Download web installer: Google Chrome Web 32-bit | Google Chrome 64-bit | Freeware Download: Google Chrome Offline Installer 64-bit | Direct Link | 131.0 MB Download: Google Chrome Offline Installer 32-bit | Direct Link | 119.0 MB Download page: Google Chrome Portable Download: Chrome ARM64 | Direct Link View: Chrome Website | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • they couldnt do W11 LTSC so the support lasts longer....
    • The fact that the pref is not enabled by default tells you that what you see is what you get...for now. Hopefully the final version will have all the quirks ironed out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      85
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!