• 0

NOD32 or Kaspersky?


  

195 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Anti-Virus should I use?

    • Kaspersky
      62
    • NOD32
      133


Question

Hey all,

I've been wanting to change my Anti-Virus for a long time now, and am wondering whether I should go for NOD32 and Kaspersky?

I'm currently using AVG Free, and am pretty much satisfied with it, but want to go in for more security by purchasing a full version of either. I've been doing a bit of research online about whether I should go for NOD32 or Kaspersky, and after a lot of looking around on different forums and statistics, I'm still undecided about the same.

People claim NOD32 as a light/fast and effective anti-virus, while Kaspersky boasts about its higher detection and removal rate. Some figures show that NOD32 has better detection rate. Seriously confusing.

I looked up the NeoWin 2008 Best Antivirus statistics and NOD32 wins hands down, with 400+ votes while Kaspersky has 150+.

It would be much appreciated if anyone could help me make the right choice. My main priority is to have maximum detection and removal rate, looking for total security.

Btw, how does bitdefender compare to them?

Regards,

Sibot

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/647662-nod32-or-kaspersky/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
I don't think I have ever seen Avira cause BSOD, more likely it's a driver or hardware fault.

Thats what, its unlikely for an AntiVirus to cause a BSOD. But, after I uninstalled Avira, there hasn't been a single BSOD, while while it was installed, I had 2 BSOD's for the first time ever.

Kaspersky found me more viruses than NOD32 before (when running full scans)

But I guess both are good and light to your computer.

Yeah, thats what everyone has been saying, but the latest AV Comparatives report says Kaspersky only found 27% of the viruses while NOD32 had a 57% success.

I think I'll be going ahead with NOD32!

  • 0
Thats what, its unlikely for an AntiVirus to cause a BSOD. But, after I uninstalled Avira, there hasn't been a single BSOD, while while it was installed, I had 2 BSOD's for the first time ever.

Yeah, thats what everyone has been saying, but the latest AV Comparatives report says Kaspersky only found 27% of the viruses while NOD32 had a 57% success.

I think I'll be going ahead with NOD32!

post-251981-1215827481_thumb.jpg

After you install Eset NOD32 double click the taskbar icon and then click 'F5' on your keyboard.

When the dialog loads click 'Real-time system protection' then 'setup' and make sure the two malware types are ticked.

I'm sure you will be pleased with Eset NOD32. (Y)

  • 0
Thats what, its unlikely for an AntiVirus to cause a BSOD. But, after I uninstalled Avira, there hasn't been a single BSOD, while while it was installed, I had 2 BSOD's for the first time ever.

Yeah, thats what everyone has been saying, but the latest AV Comparatives report says Kaspersky only found 27% of the viruses while NOD32 had a 57% success.

I think I'll be going ahead with NOD32!

I know you only want to choose between Kaspersky and NOD32, but from my own experience, I have been using Bitdefender Antivirus 10 for three years now, and I could not be happier about it. Have not had a single virus, uses 20-25 megs resources when idle and basically works like a charm.

In general, I suppose on a modern system, any of the top AV solutions will do, whether it is NOD32, Bitdefender, Kaspersky or F-Prot.

  • 0

+1 NOD32.

I am using it, and I like it. I used Kaspersky, and it wouldn't scan properly. Support was offered by the general public on their forum.

Then it decided my key was blacklisted, and after a few days no answer was given. I filed a chargeback for the payment and prompty installed NOD32.

  • 0

I'm currently running NOD v3.0 and it's using 35Mb for ekrn.exe (ESET Service) and another additional 10Mb for egui.exe (NOD32 Antivirus). I'm curious about the resource usage of Kaspersky Anti-Virus (not the security suite) for every process that belongs to KAV. I've read on the previous page that it was using 25Mb on some system.

What does that mean exactly? Does KAV only has one process and it was using 25Mb? It has 2 or more processes and one of them was using 25Mb? I'm really curious about how many processes does KAV use and how much resources they use (each).

So, anyone running KAV 2009 (no older versions please) can post a report about this?

  • 0

*stares at poll* WHOA.

I think Kaspersky is a lot better than NOD32. I actually used NOD32 a couple of weeks ago and can't stress it enough how silent NOD32 is and I favor that however the detection rate isn't as notorious as Kaspersky AVs. As I said before, I used NOD32 a couple of weeks ago and got a virus, no details from NOD32, I uninstalled and went back with KIS7, it immediately detected the virus and shoved up the AV quarantine's ass. :laugh:

KIS owns... but NOD32 is good...

  • 0

from personal experience and having used both i'd have to say Nod32

I feel it gets updated more (was receiving update packages every hour)

when i used kaspersky it felt it was neccesary to just delete(or quarantine) the virus and take my files along with it without asking (by default)

nod32's approach by default is to fix the file (which does it fine) or if not it will ask me what to do

even after trying to configure kaspersky it still felt the best option was to delete rather then fix where as nod32 fixed everything (refering to win32.salinty virus :D)

  • 0
Yeah, thats what everyone has been saying, but the latest AV Comparatives report says Kaspersky only found 27% of the viruses while NOD32 had a 57% success.

Thats for the proactive test (detection of new/unknown malware). In the ondemand tests, KAV wins over NOD32.

Anyways my suggestion is to just trial both program and buy whichever one runs better on your computer. Both are excellent AV.

  • 0
Kaspersky Online Scanner just found me this virus on some .dll file located in System32:

Trojan.Win32.BHO.eeh

But I can't really find any good info about it, can anyone help me?

NOD32 doesn't find anything on the same file...

What's the {name.dll}? Win32.BHO = Malware. Most likely left overs of malware that NOD32 didn't clean well.

  • 0

copol.dll

Just tried something else, the ESET Online Scanner and it also find this virus/malware but with a different name: Win32/Adware.IeDefender.NFM application

One thing I don't get. The online scanner founds it, but not the AV installed on the system? Yes, I have it updated and scanned only that file and it didn't report anything...

EDIT:

Nevermind, just did another update and rescanned file and it's gone.

Well, guess both Kaspersky and NOD32 found the same things on my system, I better stick with NOD... But still would love for someone that uses Kaspersky 2009 to post the memory resources used for every process that belongs to Kaspersky. Anyone?

Edited by Nazgulled
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • lots of people us facebook for stuff, threads though no
    • Can you read? I've said I'm willing to pay more for a notchless (no notch) 3:2 screen.
    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      102
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!