• 0

NOD32 or Kaspersky?


  

195 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Anti-Virus should I use?

    • Kaspersky
      62
    • NOD32
      133


Question

Hey all,

I've been wanting to change my Anti-Virus for a long time now, and am wondering whether I should go for NOD32 and Kaspersky?

I'm currently using AVG Free, and am pretty much satisfied with it, but want to go in for more security by purchasing a full version of either. I've been doing a bit of research online about whether I should go for NOD32 or Kaspersky, and after a lot of looking around on different forums and statistics, I'm still undecided about the same.

People claim NOD32 as a light/fast and effective anti-virus, while Kaspersky boasts about its higher detection and removal rate. Some figures show that NOD32 has better detection rate. Seriously confusing.

I looked up the NeoWin 2008 Best Antivirus statistics and NOD32 wins hands down, with 400+ votes while Kaspersky has 150+.

It would be much appreciated if anyone could help me make the right choice. My main priority is to have maximum detection and removal rate, looking for total security.

Btw, how does bitdefender compare to them?

Regards,

Sibot

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/647662-nod32-or-kaspersky/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
I don't think I have ever seen Avira cause BSOD, more likely it's a driver or hardware fault.

Thats what, its unlikely for an AntiVirus to cause a BSOD. But, after I uninstalled Avira, there hasn't been a single BSOD, while while it was installed, I had 2 BSOD's for the first time ever.

Kaspersky found me more viruses than NOD32 before (when running full scans)

But I guess both are good and light to your computer.

Yeah, thats what everyone has been saying, but the latest AV Comparatives report says Kaspersky only found 27% of the viruses while NOD32 had a 57% success.

I think I'll be going ahead with NOD32!

  • 0
Thats what, its unlikely for an AntiVirus to cause a BSOD. But, after I uninstalled Avira, there hasn't been a single BSOD, while while it was installed, I had 2 BSOD's for the first time ever.

Yeah, thats what everyone has been saying, but the latest AV Comparatives report says Kaspersky only found 27% of the viruses while NOD32 had a 57% success.

I think I'll be going ahead with NOD32!

post-251981-1215827481_thumb.jpg

After you install Eset NOD32 double click the taskbar icon and then click 'F5' on your keyboard.

When the dialog loads click 'Real-time system protection' then 'setup' and make sure the two malware types are ticked.

I'm sure you will be pleased with Eset NOD32. (Y)

  • 0
Thats what, its unlikely for an AntiVirus to cause a BSOD. But, after I uninstalled Avira, there hasn't been a single BSOD, while while it was installed, I had 2 BSOD's for the first time ever.

Yeah, thats what everyone has been saying, but the latest AV Comparatives report says Kaspersky only found 27% of the viruses while NOD32 had a 57% success.

I think I'll be going ahead with NOD32!

I know you only want to choose between Kaspersky and NOD32, but from my own experience, I have been using Bitdefender Antivirus 10 for three years now, and I could not be happier about it. Have not had a single virus, uses 20-25 megs resources when idle and basically works like a charm.

In general, I suppose on a modern system, any of the top AV solutions will do, whether it is NOD32, Bitdefender, Kaspersky or F-Prot.

  • 0

+1 NOD32.

I am using it, and I like it. I used Kaspersky, and it wouldn't scan properly. Support was offered by the general public on their forum.

Then it decided my key was blacklisted, and after a few days no answer was given. I filed a chargeback for the payment and prompty installed NOD32.

  • 0

I'm currently running NOD v3.0 and it's using 35Mb for ekrn.exe (ESET Service) and another additional 10Mb for egui.exe (NOD32 Antivirus). I'm curious about the resource usage of Kaspersky Anti-Virus (not the security suite) for every process that belongs to KAV. I've read on the previous page that it was using 25Mb on some system.

What does that mean exactly? Does KAV only has one process and it was using 25Mb? It has 2 or more processes and one of them was using 25Mb? I'm really curious about how many processes does KAV use and how much resources they use (each).

So, anyone running KAV 2009 (no older versions please) can post a report about this?

  • 0

*stares at poll* WHOA.

I think Kaspersky is a lot better than NOD32. I actually used NOD32 a couple of weeks ago and can't stress it enough how silent NOD32 is and I favor that however the detection rate isn't as notorious as Kaspersky AVs. As I said before, I used NOD32 a couple of weeks ago and got a virus, no details from NOD32, I uninstalled and went back with KIS7, it immediately detected the virus and shoved up the AV quarantine's ass. :laugh:

KIS owns... but NOD32 is good...

  • 0

from personal experience and having used both i'd have to say Nod32

I feel it gets updated more (was receiving update packages every hour)

when i used kaspersky it felt it was neccesary to just delete(or quarantine) the virus and take my files along with it without asking (by default)

nod32's approach by default is to fix the file (which does it fine) or if not it will ask me what to do

even after trying to configure kaspersky it still felt the best option was to delete rather then fix where as nod32 fixed everything (refering to win32.salinty virus :D)

  • 0
Yeah, thats what everyone has been saying, but the latest AV Comparatives report says Kaspersky only found 27% of the viruses while NOD32 had a 57% success.

Thats for the proactive test (detection of new/unknown malware). In the ondemand tests, KAV wins over NOD32.

Anyways my suggestion is to just trial both program and buy whichever one runs better on your computer. Both are excellent AV.

  • 0
Kaspersky Online Scanner just found me this virus on some .dll file located in System32:

Trojan.Win32.BHO.eeh

But I can't really find any good info about it, can anyone help me?

NOD32 doesn't find anything on the same file...

What's the {name.dll}? Win32.BHO = Malware. Most likely left overs of malware that NOD32 didn't clean well.

  • 0

copol.dll

Just tried something else, the ESET Online Scanner and it also find this virus/malware but with a different name: Win32/Adware.IeDefender.NFM application

One thing I don't get. The online scanner founds it, but not the AV installed on the system? Yes, I have it updated and scanned only that file and it didn't report anything...

EDIT:

Nevermind, just did another update and rescanned file and it's gone.

Well, guess both Kaspersky and NOD32 found the same things on my system, I better stick with NOD... But still would love for someone that uses Kaspersky 2009 to post the memory resources used for every process that belongs to Kaspersky. Anyone?

Edited by Nazgulled
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!