New Quad-Core build, decisions about GPU/Case/Mobo


Recommended Posts

So I'm now thinking that if I can't solve the problems with resuming from sleep and freezing completely with blank screen, that maybe I should try a different motherboard.

I started looking at the ASUS P5Q Deluxe ( http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16813131297 ), it's a little more expensive and has less USB ports, but I wonder if it's any better than the Gigabyte board I have currently. I'm just getting nervous about the system because I can't figure out these problems.

And I was connected to the system on Live Mesh yesterday and on two separate occasions I lost the connection and my roommate (who was in front of the computer) said it just froze and went to a black screen.

Well I think I would rather just buy another one (it would get to me faster than an RMA) and then return the old one if the new one works better, but I am thinking about that option as well.

I didn't know there was a new BIOS version (I'm running F7), I will update that and see if it helps.

If you want to use additional money for a new motherboard in the mean time then it's really up to you. But I wouldn't bother buying a new one until I've exhausted all my RMA / BIOS update options etc. :p

I don't think the resuming from sleep problem is related to your motherboard though, unless you have an operating system other than Vista. I had this same problem with my computer and I have talked to a couple other people who also had this problem. I think it is more Vista-related than motherboard-related.

I don't think the resuming from sleep problem is related to your motherboard though, unless you have an operating system other than Vista. I had this same problem with my computer and I have talked to a couple other people who also had this problem. I think it is more Vista-related than motherboard-related.

Well I have several other Vista machines (2 other custom builds) and they didn't have this problem. I updated the BIOS (shift informed me of a newer version) and I actually haven't had it lock up since then. And it slept yesterday after 60min of inactivity and my roommate was able to bring it back out of sleep by pressing the power button. I'm guessing I disabled the awake from keyboard/mouse.

BTW, what does PME mean? It relates to using the keyboard/mouse to awake the system from a sleep state but I wasn't sure what it meant. I just assumed Power Management something...

Maybe Power Management by External device? I think I may have fooled around in my BIOS and changed some settings in Vista to end up getting mine to work but I don't remember exactly.

That makes more sense than Power Management Event, which is what I was thinking. For some reason I thought it sounded familiar but I don't think it makes sense, at least not to me. I'm going to get my roommate to change the BIOS settings for me tonight to enable the wake by keyboard/mouse and see if the resume works correctly with the keyboard/mouse. I'll post once I find out .

I think I've changed my mind... I know the Q9450 isn't the best chip for overclocking... but if I can get RealTemp to show lower temps (- about 10C) I think I want to try overclocking my proc (with the stock cooling). What's a safe speed to get this processor to with stock cooling? Also, since I've never really done CPU overclocking, anyone know of an article that explains the the technical part of overclocking intel cpu's? Or maybe something that talks about OC'ing with the GA-EP45-DS3R.

There's something called Tjunction max for Intel CPU's. And as long as your core temperature (as read by RealTemp) is below that value, it is perfectly fine. I would give yourself about 10C threshold. So -10 of Tjunction max is fine.

As for overclocking intel CPU's take a look at this link: http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.as...p;enterthread=y

Don't use absolute temperatures, use the delta to tjunction max. When that delta becomes zero, the processor will think itself to be too hot and automatically take steps to change that. Another 10?C-15?C over and the chip will shut itself off. Theoretically, you can run 1?C under Tjunction Max and be fine forever...of course that's in theory. Different people like to maintain different buffers, some 15-20?C and some 10-15?C, the cooler the chip is the higher the probability of it lasting longer. Of course running 10?C from tj max v. 20?C from tj max doesn't necessarily mean that your chip will die tomorrow versus 50 years from now, these chips are pretty durable and they'll run for a while. So change your settings to "delta from tjunction max" and use those figures.

As for an overclocking guide, here:

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.as...p;enterthread=y

edit: rofl, I'm on [H], AT, and XS right now and happened to pick the AT sticky to post.

There's something called Tjunction max for Intel CPU's. And as long as your core temperature (as read by RealTemp) is below that value, it is perfectly fine. I would give yourself about 10C threshold. So -10 of Tjunction max is fine.

As for overclocking intel CPU's take a look at this link: http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.as...p;enterthread=y

Yeah, I saw that Tjunction max last night, I don't really know what it means or is, but I don't think it was too much higher than the core temps RealTemp was displaying. I'll try to get a screenshot of RealTemp and post it here in a few minutes.

So when OC'ing it I should try to keep the core temps about 10C below the tjunction max? What should I do if right now (stock settings) the core temps are not too far below the tjmax?

Don't use absolute temperatures, use the delta to tjunction max. When that delta becomes zero, the processor will think itself to be too hot and automatically take steps to change that. Another 10?C-15?C over and the chip will shut itself off. Theoretically, you can run 1?C under Tjunction Max and be fine forever...of course that's in theory. Different people like to maintain different buffers, some 15-20?C and some 10-15?C, the cooler the chip is the higher the probability of it lasting longer. Of course running 10?C from tj max v. 20?C from tj max doesn't necessarily mean that your chip will die tomorrow versus 50 years from now, these chips are pretty durable and they'll run for a while. So change your settings to "delta from tjunction max" and use those figures.

As for an overclocking guide, here:

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.as...p;enterthread=y

edit: rofl, I'm on [H], AT, and XS right now and happened to pick the AT sticky to post.

Thanks Shift and gwai lo, I'm going to look through this guide and try to get a screenshot of my RealTemp status to see what you guys think.

Here's a full explanation of all the stuff you should worry about, it's kind of long, but it'll explain everything.

http://www.hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=10...mp;postcount=31

As for what to do if you're just below tjunction max already....do the typical checks for seating, etc etc.

Here are the stats from RealTemp, this is after the system running for about 5 minutes. I think I was mixed up with the Distance to TJ Max thing... I think I thought it was displaying the TJ Max. So what do you guys think?

post-39384-1216436978_thumb.jpg

Try putting your CPU at load with ORTHOS or Prime95 and see what your temperatures are. If your load temperatures are within acceptable limits then I don't think you should have any problems.

Try putting your CPU at load with ORTHOS or Prime95 and see what your temperatures are. If your load temperatures are within acceptable limits then I don't think you should have any problems.

Okay, I have prime95 running, and two of the cores are jumping from a "Distance to TJ Max" of 0 to 126/127. They're the two that are circled.

post-39384-1216439379.jpg

That doesn't look too right. Are you sure your heatsink is seated properly? 96C would mean it's above your Tjunction max for that chip (which I is 95C)

I would check that your heatsink is seated on the processor correctly, those temperatures are way to high even for an non-overclocked system.

No problem. Even with stock cooling those temperatures shouldn't be that high.

Okay, I reseated the heatsink... I have a feeling all four pegs weren't snapped in... but RealTemp is still reporting core temps of about 44C, 39C, 44C, and 42C for the cores, plus or minus 1C.

Should I try running Prime95 again?

EDIT: Okay, after about 8 mins running Prim95 (more than I let the other test run when I saw those really high temps), this is what RealTemp is showing.

post-39384-1216445296.jpg

Edited by Chsoriano

That looks MUCH better. See the difference between a badly seated heatsink + a well seated one? -30 form Tjunction looks a lot better than 3C from Tjunction. :p

Now you can try overclocking to see how high LOAD temperatures get. Put your computer at load for at least 6 hours. And if it's stable for that long, then it's good. :)

That looks MUCH better. See the difference between a badly seated heatsink + a well seated one? -30 form Tjunction looks a lot better than 3C from Tjunction. :p

Now you can try overclocking to see how high LOAD temperatures get. Put your computer at load for at least 6 hours. And if it's stable for that long, then it's good. :)

Sweet, I'll jump into the BIOS later on after I read through that article you posted (I've read through it once but would like to go through it again to make sure I understand as much of it as possible).

I finally tweaked the timing for my RAM also, the mobo had the timing pretty off, so I set it at what it was supposed to be.

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1326875

This would also be a good thread to read if you want to know more about CPU's and their temperatures and how they are measured.

It would also explain what PROCHOT is in your RealTemp screenshot and why there are two check marks below the two cores with 96C in your first screenshot. ;)

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1326875

This would also be a good thread to read if you want to know more about CPU's and their temperatures and how they are measured.

It would also explain what PROCHOT is in your RealTemp screenshot and why there are two check marks below the two cores with 96C in your first screenshot. ;)

I read through that this morning, thanks, explained quite a bit, along with the other article you recommended to me.

I was going to try to OC it today, but I am going to put that off since I am having other problems with the system. I tried to resume it from sleep (S3) today and again it didn't work. I have hybrid sleep enabled so when I turned it off it loaded from the HDD. However, it still hung at a black screen. Also, yesterday when it was restarting once, I got a BSOD, didn't have time to get all the details but the name of the driver that caused the problem started with ati... so maybe I need to wait for the first release of drivers for my 4870 before I start messing with anything else. I want to make sure everything is working correctly first.

Okay, I reseated the heatsink... I have a feeling all four pegs weren't snapped in... but RealTemp is still reporting core temps of about 44C, 39C, 44C, and 42C for the cores, plus or minus 1C.

Should I try running Prime95 again?

EDIT: Okay, after about 8 mins running Prim95 (more than I let the other test run when I saw those really high temps), this is what RealTemp is showing.

Those temps look alot better. Gotta love those push pins. :angry:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!