New Quad-Core build, decisions about GPU/Case/Mobo


Recommended Posts

So I'm now thinking that if I can't solve the problems with resuming from sleep and freezing completely with blank screen, that maybe I should try a different motherboard.

I started looking at the ASUS P5Q Deluxe ( http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16813131297 ), it's a little more expensive and has less USB ports, but I wonder if it's any better than the Gigabyte board I have currently. I'm just getting nervous about the system because I can't figure out these problems.

And I was connected to the system on Live Mesh yesterday and on two separate occasions I lost the connection and my roommate (who was in front of the computer) said it just froze and went to a black screen.

Well I think I would rather just buy another one (it would get to me faster than an RMA) and then return the old one if the new one works better, but I am thinking about that option as well.

I didn't know there was a new BIOS version (I'm running F7), I will update that and see if it helps.

If you want to use additional money for a new motherboard in the mean time then it's really up to you. But I wouldn't bother buying a new one until I've exhausted all my RMA / BIOS update options etc. :p

I don't think the resuming from sleep problem is related to your motherboard though, unless you have an operating system other than Vista. I had this same problem with my computer and I have talked to a couple other people who also had this problem. I think it is more Vista-related than motherboard-related.

I don't think the resuming from sleep problem is related to your motherboard though, unless you have an operating system other than Vista. I had this same problem with my computer and I have talked to a couple other people who also had this problem. I think it is more Vista-related than motherboard-related.

Well I have several other Vista machines (2 other custom builds) and they didn't have this problem. I updated the BIOS (shift informed me of a newer version) and I actually haven't had it lock up since then. And it slept yesterday after 60min of inactivity and my roommate was able to bring it back out of sleep by pressing the power button. I'm guessing I disabled the awake from keyboard/mouse.

BTW, what does PME mean? It relates to using the keyboard/mouse to awake the system from a sleep state but I wasn't sure what it meant. I just assumed Power Management something...

Maybe Power Management by External device? I think I may have fooled around in my BIOS and changed some settings in Vista to end up getting mine to work but I don't remember exactly.

That makes more sense than Power Management Event, which is what I was thinking. For some reason I thought it sounded familiar but I don't think it makes sense, at least not to me. I'm going to get my roommate to change the BIOS settings for me tonight to enable the wake by keyboard/mouse and see if the resume works correctly with the keyboard/mouse. I'll post once I find out .

I think I've changed my mind... I know the Q9450 isn't the best chip for overclocking... but if I can get RealTemp to show lower temps (- about 10C) I think I want to try overclocking my proc (with the stock cooling). What's a safe speed to get this processor to with stock cooling? Also, since I've never really done CPU overclocking, anyone know of an article that explains the the technical part of overclocking intel cpu's? Or maybe something that talks about OC'ing with the GA-EP45-DS3R.

There's something called Tjunction max for Intel CPU's. And as long as your core temperature (as read by RealTemp) is below that value, it is perfectly fine. I would give yourself about 10C threshold. So -10 of Tjunction max is fine.

As for overclocking intel CPU's take a look at this link: http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.as...p;enterthread=y

Don't use absolute temperatures, use the delta to tjunction max. When that delta becomes zero, the processor will think itself to be too hot and automatically take steps to change that. Another 10?C-15?C over and the chip will shut itself off. Theoretically, you can run 1?C under Tjunction Max and be fine forever...of course that's in theory. Different people like to maintain different buffers, some 15-20?C and some 10-15?C, the cooler the chip is the higher the probability of it lasting longer. Of course running 10?C from tj max v. 20?C from tj max doesn't necessarily mean that your chip will die tomorrow versus 50 years from now, these chips are pretty durable and they'll run for a while. So change your settings to "delta from tjunction max" and use those figures.

As for an overclocking guide, here:

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.as...p;enterthread=y

edit: rofl, I'm on [H], AT, and XS right now and happened to pick the AT sticky to post.

There's something called Tjunction max for Intel CPU's. And as long as your core temperature (as read by RealTemp) is below that value, it is perfectly fine. I would give yourself about 10C threshold. So -10 of Tjunction max is fine.

As for overclocking intel CPU's take a look at this link: http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.as...p;enterthread=y

Yeah, I saw that Tjunction max last night, I don't really know what it means or is, but I don't think it was too much higher than the core temps RealTemp was displaying. I'll try to get a screenshot of RealTemp and post it here in a few minutes.

So when OC'ing it I should try to keep the core temps about 10C below the tjunction max? What should I do if right now (stock settings) the core temps are not too far below the tjmax?

Don't use absolute temperatures, use the delta to tjunction max. When that delta becomes zero, the processor will think itself to be too hot and automatically take steps to change that. Another 10?C-15?C over and the chip will shut itself off. Theoretically, you can run 1?C under Tjunction Max and be fine forever...of course that's in theory. Different people like to maintain different buffers, some 15-20?C and some 10-15?C, the cooler the chip is the higher the probability of it lasting longer. Of course running 10?C from tj max v. 20?C from tj max doesn't necessarily mean that your chip will die tomorrow versus 50 years from now, these chips are pretty durable and they'll run for a while. So change your settings to "delta from tjunction max" and use those figures.

As for an overclocking guide, here:

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.as...p;enterthread=y

edit: rofl, I'm on [H], AT, and XS right now and happened to pick the AT sticky to post.

Thanks Shift and gwai lo, I'm going to look through this guide and try to get a screenshot of my RealTemp status to see what you guys think.

Here's a full explanation of all the stuff you should worry about, it's kind of long, but it'll explain everything.

http://www.hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=10...mp;postcount=31

As for what to do if you're just below tjunction max already....do the typical checks for seating, etc etc.

Here are the stats from RealTemp, this is after the system running for about 5 minutes. I think I was mixed up with the Distance to TJ Max thing... I think I thought it was displaying the TJ Max. So what do you guys think?

post-39384-1216436978_thumb.jpg

Try putting your CPU at load with ORTHOS or Prime95 and see what your temperatures are. If your load temperatures are within acceptable limits then I don't think you should have any problems.

Try putting your CPU at load with ORTHOS or Prime95 and see what your temperatures are. If your load temperatures are within acceptable limits then I don't think you should have any problems.

Okay, I have prime95 running, and two of the cores are jumping from a "Distance to TJ Max" of 0 to 126/127. They're the two that are circled.

post-39384-1216439379.jpg

That doesn't look too right. Are you sure your heatsink is seated properly? 96C would mean it's above your Tjunction max for that chip (which I is 95C)

I would check that your heatsink is seated on the processor correctly, those temperatures are way to high even for an non-overclocked system.

No problem. Even with stock cooling those temperatures shouldn't be that high.

Okay, I reseated the heatsink... I have a feeling all four pegs weren't snapped in... but RealTemp is still reporting core temps of about 44C, 39C, 44C, and 42C for the cores, plus or minus 1C.

Should I try running Prime95 again?

EDIT: Okay, after about 8 mins running Prim95 (more than I let the other test run when I saw those really high temps), this is what RealTemp is showing.

post-39384-1216445296.jpg

Edited by Chsoriano

That looks MUCH better. See the difference between a badly seated heatsink + a well seated one? -30 form Tjunction looks a lot better than 3C from Tjunction. :p

Now you can try overclocking to see how high LOAD temperatures get. Put your computer at load for at least 6 hours. And if it's stable for that long, then it's good. :)

That looks MUCH better. See the difference between a badly seated heatsink + a well seated one? -30 form Tjunction looks a lot better than 3C from Tjunction. :p

Now you can try overclocking to see how high LOAD temperatures get. Put your computer at load for at least 6 hours. And if it's stable for that long, then it's good. :)

Sweet, I'll jump into the BIOS later on after I read through that article you posted (I've read through it once but would like to go through it again to make sure I understand as much of it as possible).

I finally tweaked the timing for my RAM also, the mobo had the timing pretty off, so I set it at what it was supposed to be.

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1326875

This would also be a good thread to read if you want to know more about CPU's and their temperatures and how they are measured.

It would also explain what PROCHOT is in your RealTemp screenshot and why there are two check marks below the two cores with 96C in your first screenshot. ;)

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1326875

This would also be a good thread to read if you want to know more about CPU's and their temperatures and how they are measured.

It would also explain what PROCHOT is in your RealTemp screenshot and why there are two check marks below the two cores with 96C in your first screenshot. ;)

I read through that this morning, thanks, explained quite a bit, along with the other article you recommended to me.

I was going to try to OC it today, but I am going to put that off since I am having other problems with the system. I tried to resume it from sleep (S3) today and again it didn't work. I have hybrid sleep enabled so when I turned it off it loaded from the HDD. However, it still hung at a black screen. Also, yesterday when it was restarting once, I got a BSOD, didn't have time to get all the details but the name of the driver that caused the problem started with ati... so maybe I need to wait for the first release of drivers for my 4870 before I start messing with anything else. I want to make sure everything is working correctly first.

Okay, I reseated the heatsink... I have a feeling all four pegs weren't snapped in... but RealTemp is still reporting core temps of about 44C, 39C, 44C, and 42C for the cores, plus or minus 1C.

Should I try running Prime95 again?

EDIT: Okay, after about 8 mins running Prim95 (more than I let the other test run when I saw those really high temps), this is what RealTemp is showing.

Those temps look alot better. Gotta love those push pins. :angry:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Exactly. They won't go 100 because current gen consoles are simply too old for any groundbreaking graphics or gaming experience otherwise. They will go with standard (console) price 70 or go with 80 if they really want to go premium. Of course they will have more expensive options too with some useless cosmetics as always.
    • Doesn’t surprise me at all. God is light & He gave us life so it sounds almost logical that we would therefore emit a certain amount of light.
    • This is what I want. Hey Gemini, how do I remove you from all my google products permanently?
    • I would never install install this build before rtm process. only 3 months to go. never install on your daily devices. just wait 3 months.
    • Motrix Next 3.9.6 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.6 changelog: New Features Clipboard management — App-owned copy actions no longer trigger the Add Task auto-detect popup. aria2 input compatibility — Multi-line aria2-style task input is supported for URLs with per-task options such as out=. BitTorrent IPv6 DHT — Added IPv6 DHT support and related configuration. File category URL patterns — File category rules can match URL patterns with validation and localized hints. Task status tags — Added clearer waiting and sharing states for task cards. Download event bridge — Added an aria2 WebSocket event bridge for faster download notifications. Improvements Improved task list transitions and preserved task state during tab switches. Kept RPC origin access enabled for local integrations. Restored AppImage stripping in release builds after beta validation. Added localized preference guidance across supported languages. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!