Leaked Info on 60gb Starter Kit and 20gb's Death


Recommended Posts

There has been a lot of speculation as to how the rumored 60gb hard drive would impact the established hardware in the Xbox 360 lineup. Thanks to some leaked info, we have the complete details. ... Below is a portion of an email being sent out to GameStop and Blockbuster buyers (logistical people handling what the store actually stocks). The email has the complete details on the 60gb hard drive and what will happen to the 20gb and 120gb hard drives. Email follows:

With the introduction of the 60GB Pro console in July, we have research that suggests it is very important to have a 60GB stand alone Hard Drive to go along with it to allow the consumer a full range of choices and values. In late October/early November (exact date TBD but most likely last week in October or 1st week in November), we will ship the Xbox 360 60GB Hard Drive, tentatively called the “Xbox 360 60GB LIVE Starter Pack”. This will be an excellent value price at and ERP of $99.99 with an 18% retail margin that contains:

? 60GB Hard Drive

? 3 Months of Xbox Live

? Xbox 360 Wired Headset

? Xbox 360 Ethernet Cable (same one that is included with Pro and Elite)

Positioning: For Xbox 360 Arcade and Core console owners, the Xbox 360 60GB Live Starter Pack offers all of the components to get onto Xbox LIVE and jump in to on line multiplayer gaming and Marketplace content downloads at an incredible value.

With the end of life of the 20GB Hard Drive and the price drop of the 120GB Hard Drive to $149.99 in September, this new 60GB hard drive will fit very well into our “Choice and Value” pillar and will fit nicely into our accessory line up. Exact SKU/UPC/Set up info will come soon and once we nail down the exact MSD, I will let you all know immediately.

<END>

The XBF Take: How is 150 bucks a good deal for 120 gigs of storage? But at least this 60gb will give new comers a decent setup and enough space to enjoy XBL. But then again, XBLA games keep getting bigger. When will we get a large HDD at a low price? We'll relay more information as soon as we have it.

Source: http://xboxfamily.com/us/index.php/Latest/...gb-s-Death.html

By the way, this is talking about a 60GB HDD addon, not a console.

At first I was like what?! Console for $99?:laugh:ugh:

$99 for 60GB though is still a little bit of a pinch at your wallet. I hope they sell a 60GB pack without all the above extras that are there to obviously compensate for the inflated price.

On retrospect on what has happened with these 60GB rumours over the past few weeks, I wonder if the 60GB model is actually still coming or if the 60GB is just planned as an addon?

My bet, Pro 360 20GB is dropped to $299 to clear them out, and then a 60GB model will be introduced eventually.

Right now though 60GB will just be an addon.

The kicker is the 60GB model will probably come at $299, but the 20GB stock has to be cleared first....

On retrospect on what has happened with these 60GB rumours over the past few weeks, I wonder if the 60GB model is actually still coming or if the 60GB is just planned as an addon?

My bet, Pro 360 20GB is dropped to $299 to clear them out, and then a 60GB model will be introduced eventually.

Right now though 60GB will just be an addon.

The kicker is the 60GB model will probably come at $299, but the 20GB stock has to be cleared first....

you reckon that they'll phase out the 20gb, repackage the core and this starter pack and slap a 'Pro' sticker on it?

you reckon that they'll phase out the 20gb, repackage the core and this starter pack and slap a 'Pro' sticker on it?

The core won't be touched. For whatever daft reason MS want to keep a hdd-less console on the market - No I'm not looking for another argument on this, we went for 5~6 pages a few weeks back.

What I'm saying will happen is this 60GB hdd addon will come out that MS say is aimed at core owners/pro owners. They'll drop the price of the Pro (20GB) to $299

494x_e4f0477a4b758664ae23e9d101d800ec.jpg

07-08-08_1044_01.jpg

But in a few months they'll "ditch" (or in other words sell out the stock they have) the above 20GB, and start selling a 60GB Pro at $299 along side the 60GB addon at $99.

That's my guess.

I think it will be pretty funny though if a 60GB model does come in at $299 and the 60GB hdd addon sells for 1/3 of the cost of the console.

I was fortunate to find someone to trade their 360 Pro with for Wii, so I have a 20GB drive, but $99 for 60GB and $149 for 120GB is just plain dumb. With the cheap prices of hard drives, spending that much on such a tiny bit (in comparison) is just crazy. I don't think I'll ever purchase a new drive until they're much closer to the prices of standard drives.

@Audio - That email states that the 60GB Pro is being introduced this month...

-Spenser

Um I must be blind but I don't read that anywhere.

It talks about the 60GB Starter pack... Nothing about a 60GB Pro.

I swear I've now read it 3 times.

edit: :laugh: first sentence.

Oh well if the 20GB is going to $299 this month, I wonder what the 60GB will be. MS will have 4 models on the market for a while.

Ugh, I've got to get me an Xbox 360 one of these days.

What I'd prefer (instead of $99 for 60GB), Is just buying an empty shell with the necessary parts to hook my own drive in. I can get a 650GB hard drive for $150 at a store near here.

Um I must be blind but I don't read that anywhere.

It talks about the 60GB Starter pack... Nothing about a 60GB Pro.

I swear I've now read it 3 times.

edit: :laugh: first sentence.

:p

I figured you just missed it, it's a pretty short reference, but it's there.

-Spenser

Ugh, I've got to get me an Xbox 360 one of these days.

What I'd prefer (instead of $99 for 60GB), Is just buying an empty shell with the necessary parts to hook my own drive in. I can get a 650GB hard drive for $150 at a store near here.

You do realize like the PS3, the 360 hard drives are 2.5" laptop SATA drives right?

I'm guessing 2.5" drives aren't up to 650GB yet?

If they are, not for $150 I can tell you that much, Newegg has 320GB 2.5" drives ranging from $110-$180, that would probably smack a 650GB in the $250+ range.

EDIT: According to Wikipedia the highest capacity 2.5" is 500GB currently on the market looks like.

You do realize like the PS3, the 360 hard drives are 2.5" laptop SATA drives right?

Yeah, but that involves (for lack of a better term) "cracking" it open. While I can do it, it'd be easier to have it designed to be easily opened and swapped out.

Edit: Yeah, 2.5 inch is $139 for 320GB

Yeah, but that involves (for lack of a better term) "cracking" it open. While I can do it, it'd be easier to have it designed to be easily opened and swapped out.

Edit: Yeah, 2.5 inch is $139 for 320GB

I know what you mean, unfortunately MS wanted to make Money off of it plus it would require the OS on the onboard ROM to be able to install all the neccessary software on the hard drives, I am unsure if the 2GB reserved for backwards compat is even close to full, the ROM chip may not be big enough to handle the extra content needed to install a hard drive, but then again that could be gotten around with a data disc that would set the drive up for you. I am going to upgrade my PS3 hdd sometime, maybe when it gets closer to home, don't know :)

I would be all over one of these drives in an instant if they were just more fairly priced. I am so sick of deleting things to make room for Marketplace Movies (I on average get at least a movie a week). Oh well. Still will patiently be waiting for the day they make it cheaper.

Oh well if the 20GB is going to $299 this month, I wonder what the 60GB will be. MS will have 4 models on the market for a while.

Rumour has it that the 60GB will keep the $349 price point. They'll most likely wait until the 20GB is cleared out, then drop the 60GB to $299, probably later in the year. Hmm, d?j? vu...

Well, you know, we can moan about the 60GB price at $99, but the cost in total is not JUST for the 2.5" SATA HDD inside!

You have to factor in the cost for the HDD, the external case, the other bits inside that connect the HDD to the case and then to the 360. YOu have to factor in packaging costs, and then finally you have to factor in the margins that retailers have for which they make a profit on.

The thing is to find out how much this costs MS to make and what they sell it to retailers for. IF It costs MS like, $50 for everything, and they sell it to retail for say $70 (making $20 a pop), and then retail turns around and sells it for $100 making $30 it all fits in really. It's a whole retail chain/channel, now I'm sure those prices I've guessed aren't right, but it's probably close, you have to figure MS and then retail stores are making $20-$30 in profit to get it up to $100.

Well, you know, we can moan about the 60GB price at $99, but the cost in total is not JUST for the 2.5" SATA HDD inside!

You have to factor in the cost for the HDD, the external case, the other bits inside that connect the HDD to the case and then to the 360. YOu have to factor in packaging costs, and then finally you have to factor in the margins that retailers have for which they make a profit on.

The thing is to find out how much this costs MS to make and what they sell it to retailers for. IF It costs MS like, $50 for everything, and they sell it to retail for say $70 (making $20 a pop), and then retail turns around and sells it for $100 making $30 it all fits in really. It's a whole retail chain/channel, now I'm sure those prices I've guessed aren't right, but it's probably close, you have to figure MS and then retail stores are making $20-$30 in profit to get it up to $100.

There's no way this thing costs MS $50. Not even close. Take a look at the guts. Considering Microsoft is buying all of the parts in large quantities by the thousands (probably tens of thousands), and that the average consumer can buy a 60GB 2.5" drive for $50, my uneducated guess would be it's costing MS around $7 per drive, possibly as low as $5 (heck, maybe lower!). All of the other parts are probably a few dollars combined because SATA adapters are dirt cheap, plastic is dirt cheap, and the little bit of metal included is cheap. Simply put: the price tag on the 360 drives is a rip-off.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!