[Updated 8/04] Apple Sues Unauthorized Clone Maker Psystar


Recommended Posts

Maybe I'm just incredibly stupid, but I fail to see how Apple is a monopoly in any way. You can choose to use other hardware and you can choose to use other software. What's the problem?

This "OMG MONOPOLY!!!111" stuff is getting a little old.

the monopoly is that Apple wants you to buy THEIR hardware to run THEIR software. What this company is doing is akin to what clone PC's did to IBM, make things competitive. IF this company wins, then I'd see Apple lower prices to stay competitive..then again not!

IMHO, Apple are such dumb ****s when it comes to prices. :sleep:

That doesn't make them a monopoly.

They aren't the sole supplier of computers, they are just a OEM that has a custom OS they only support on their branded hardware (Anybody can buy and run OS X without support)

Edit: And they aren't unfairly pushing competitors out of the market, suing somebody for copyright infringement because they're redistributing your software when they're not allowed to doesn't count.

Yep, it's funny.

http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/guidelines/0558.htm#t22

Intellectual property and market power

Market power is the ability profitably to maintain prices above, or output below, competitive levels for a significant period of time.(10) The Agencies will not presume that a patent, copyright, or trade secret necessarily confers market power upon its owner. Although the intellectual property right confers the power to exclude with respect to the specific product, process, or work in question, there will often be sufficient actual or potential close substitutes for such product, process, or work to prevent the exercise of market power.(11)

If a patent or other form of intellectual property does confer market power, that market power does not by itself offend the antitrust laws. As with any other tangible or intangible asset that enables its owner to obtain significant supracompetitive profits, market power (or even a monopoly) that is solely "a consequence of a superior product, business acumen, or historic accident" does not violate the antitrust laws.(12) Nor does such market power impose on the intellectual property owner an obligation to license the use of that property to others. As in other antitrust contexts, however, market power could be illegally acquired or maintained, or, even if lawfully acquired and maintained, would be relevant to the ability of an intellectual property owner to harm competition through unreasonable conduct in connection with such property.

I'm sorry, but I am only in my second week of business law. Is that saying that Apple does not need to license out the use of OSX on other computers?

It says that Apple being able to tell people what hardware OS X can run on does not necessarily mean Apple has a monopoly. It also says that, yes, Apple does not have to license OS X if it doesn't want to.

the monopoly is that Apple wants you to buy THEIR hardware to run THEIR software. What this company is doing is akin to what clone PC's did to IBM, make things competitive. IF this company wins, then I'd see Apple lower prices to stay competitive..then again not!

IMHO, Apple are such dumb ****s when it comes to prices. sleeping.gif

You know what I did when I realized that Apple's hardware is overpriced crap? I stopped using OS X. Do you know what effect that had on my life? None. If there was really a monopoly, I would have had two choices: use Apple products, or stop using computers altogether.

Just because Apple decides what hardware you can and cannot use OS X on does not make them a monopoly, because as I stated in the very post you quoted, you can choose other software and you can choose other hardware. The people that buy Apple products are not being forced to; they actually want to. Is the stuff expensive? Sure. But you can't say it's a monopoly until people have no other choice but to buy from Apple, which isn't the case.

Edited by shihchiun
It says that Apple being able to tell people what hardware OS X can run on does not necessarily mean Apple has a monopoly. It also says that, yes, Apple does not have to license OS X if it doesn't want to.

You know what I did when I realized that Apple's hardware is overpriced crap? I stopped using OS X. Do you know what effect that had on my life? None. If there was really a monopoly, I would have had two choices: use Apple products, or stop using computers altogether.

Just because Apple decides what hardware you can and cannot use OS X on does not make them a monopoly, because as I stated in the very post you quoted, you can choose other software and you can choose other hardware. The people that buy Apple products are not being forced to; they actually want to. Is the stuff expensive? Sure. But you can't say it's a monopoly until people have no other choice but to buy from Apple, which isn't the case.

I think discussions such as this are compelling reasons why Linux looks so much more appealing. But linux can't even get itself into the mainstream to challenge the likes of Apple or MS.

I've heard that APPLES OSX runs good but, the prices that Jobs and Co. sell their systems for could be equated to legalized ass rape and the people who buy apple stuff just love it!!!

I'll patiently wait to see how this unfolds...

Ehh, the prices are similar to other computer systems.

Low end dells aren't much cheaper than low end macs here.

In the UK you can get a similar style laptop to the macbook for less with better specs:

Dell M1330												Macbook
2.0Ghz Core 2 Duo									2.1Ghz Core 2 Duo
13" LED Backlit Screen 1280x800			  13" LED Backlit Screen 1280x800
250Gb HDD												120Gb HDD
3Gb Ram													1Gb Ram
128Mb Nvidia 8400GS								Integrated GMA X3100
8x Dual Layer DVD-RW							   CD-RW/DVD-ROM Combo Drive
?679														   ?700

You cant underspec the Dell to have compareable specs to the Macbook but im sure it would be at least ?100 cheaper for the same spec. Apple prices are ridiculous.

You cant underspec the Dell to have compareable specs to the Macbook but im sure it would be at least ?200> cheaper for the same spec. Apple prices are ridiculous.

Fixed =). The Dell has more memory (x3 more), twice the hdd, a much, much superior graphic card, a better drive and yet it costsLESS> then a mac.

I never understand how does these mac people say that the mac is in the same price range.....

Fixed =). The Dell has more memory (x3 more), twice the hdd, a much, much superior graphic card, a better drive and yet it costs LESS then a mac.

I never understand how does these mac people say that the mac is in the same price range.....

No bias here then :p

I love the bit about the "much much superior gfx card" You do realize the dell and the mac both have the GMA x3100? Even if you were talking about the 8400, you can't seriously believe that it's much can you? It's an OEM only piece of crap that OEMs use to say that the gfx are 0.1 of a step up from integrated. To quote wikipedia it's an alternative to integrated gfx - designed for watching video not gaming. They also have next to identical combo drives. It also cracked me up that although the same graphics card on the dell was "much much better", the faster CPU on the MB was overlooked.

To me, the ?21 + the cost of a few cheap sticks of RAM more than the dell is worth it 5x over for the OS on the mac.

Edit: Also, if you look carefully he has tried to pull the wool over our eyes by including the name of the 8400 but the price of the x3100.:shiftyninja::

Just my 2 cents;))

Edited by Aesclepius
I think discussions such as this are compelling reasons why Linux looks so much more appealing. But linux can't even get itself into the mainstream to challenge the likes of Apple or MS.

I've heard that APPLES OSX runs good but, the prices that Jobs and Co. sell their systems for could be equated to legalized ass rape and the people who buy apple stuff just love it!!!

I'll patiently wait to see how this unfolds...

Do you feel that the prices for all luxury products amount to "legalized ass rape," or just Apple stuff? I'm just asking, not trying to attack you or anything.

No bias here then :p

I love the bit about the "much much superior gfx card" You do realize the dell and the mac both have the GMA x3100? Even if you were talking about the 8400, you can't seriously believe that it's much can you? It's an OEM only piece of crap that OEMs use to say that the gfx are 0.1 of a step up from integrated. To quote wikipedia it's an alternative to integrated gfx - designed for watching video not gaming. They also have next to identical combo drives. It also cracked me up that although the same graphics card on the dell was "much much better", the faster CPU on the MB was overlooked.

To me, the ?21 + the cost of a few cheap sticks of RAM more than the dell is worth it 5x over for the OS on the mac.

Edit: Also, if you look carefully he has tried to pull the wool over our eyes by including the name of the 8400 but the price of the x3100.:shiftyninja::

Just my 2 cents;))

Are you crazy? if macs were so great, then why did Apple/jobs go and make a version of OSX for intel? probably because the hardware was better? probably the hardware was ? if i were to build a mac system, one with PC hardware and the other with apple hardware, the mac price would be off the charts.

common sense would dictate that, if apple wanted to make real $$, they would release a version for PC's. But apple would be ****ed because they would actually have to develop the OS for a wide range of hardware and that would = WORK!

my impression of apple mac users are of people who think of themselves as elitist jerks. this is a perfect example;

20020712h.gif

I never said I liked power pc architecture ;)

Also, one of the reasons that windows is horrible to use - IMO !! - is because of it's lack of adaption to a wide range of hardware. Really, before you condemn apple for not adapting to a wide range of hardware, maybe microsoft should do a half decent job first. One of the reasons I use macs is because of the seamless hardware / software integration.

Nothing in my post was elitist, all I did was point out the innaccuracies and spin in another post. If you don't want to answer my post then by all means continue to insult me - but don't try and deflect attention from the lies in the post I replies to.

I never said I liked power pc architecture ;)

Also, one of the reasons that windows is horrible to use - IMO !! - is because of it's lack of adaption to a wide range of hardware. Really, before you condemn apple for not adapting to a wide range of hardware, maybe microsoft should do a half decent job first. One of the reasons I use macs is because of the seamless hardware / software integration.

Why should Microsoft have to support 3rd party Hardware, its up to the hardware manufacturers to create drivers for the hardware. If you think Mac supports more hardware than a Windows PC then you are sorely mistaken, OSX is a closed system, you cant pick up any PCI-Express graphics card and drop it in you have to use what Apple says you can use.

Well, if that's the case, I guess we could sue Microsoft. Look at the 360. It has a custom OS, but you have to buy a 360 to run it.

Kinda sucks huh? :/

Wow what a crap analogy, ill bet you own a mac. You cant buy the Xbox 360 OS to run seperately so Microsoft arent forcing you to install it on their own Xbox 360 hardware like Apple is tying you to their hardware. If you could buy the 360 hardware and run any OS you wanted on it but Microsoft says you can only use their own Xbox 360 OS on their console but not anyone elses then maybe that analogy would be accurate.

I never said I liked power pc architecture ;)

Also, one of the reasons that windows is horrible to use - IMO !! - is because of it's lack of adaption to a wide range of hardware. Really, before you condemn apple for not adapting to a wide range of hardware, maybe microsoft should do a half decent job first. One of the reasons I use macs is because of the seamless hardware / software integration.

Nothing in my post was elitist, all I did was point out the innaccuracies and spin in another post. If you don't want to answer my post then by all means continue to insult me - but don't try and deflect attention from the lies in the post I replies to.

MS has in fact enlisted PC hardware vendors for drivers, ALBEIT the fact MS screwed the pooch with vista. But I must disagree with you on the premise of the hardware issue. MS basically brought computers to the masses. sure there are numerous hardware vendors and that in itself helps to some degree to keep the price of hardware down.

Apple seems to like the idea of closed hardware. maybe a bad term.

in retrospect, maybe it's just a choice issue? you like mac, I like PC. I know mac OSX is good for photographers but I can't see myself shelling out minimum $1,099 for the lowest end with just a 13" display, 1GB Ram and a 120GB HDD. that being said, the macbook pro start @ $1,999 for a 15" display, a Core2 duo 2.4Ghz, 200GB HDD and a Nvidia Geforce 8600M GT 256mb ram...for 2k!

I guess a more realistic statement about apple is when you buy their systems, it's a captured audience. the most expensive macbook pro is on the lower end or outside the lower end specs of an alienware system.

Apple official website

Why should Microsoft have to support 3rd party Hardware, its up to the hardware manufacturers to create drivers for the hardware. If you think Mac supports more hardware than a Windows PC then you are sorely mistaken, OSX is a closed system, you cant pick up any PCI-Express graphics card and drop it in you have to use what Apple says you can use.

It's up to the hardware manufacturers to use the correct firmware on their graphics cards. It's just that the majority of video cards are made for PCs.

MS has in fact enlisted PC hardware vendors for drivers, ALBEIT the fact MS screwed the pooch with vista. But I must disagree with you on the premise of the hardware issue. MS basically brought computers to the masses. sure there are numerous hardware vendors and that in itself helps to some degree to keep the price of hardware down.

Apple seems to like the idea of closed hardware. maybe a bad term.

in retrospect, maybe it's just a choice issue? you like mac, I like PC. I know mac OSX is good for photographers but I can't see myself shelling out minimum $1,099 for the lowest end with just a 13" display, 1GB Ram and a 120GB HDD. that being said, the macbook pro start @ $1,999 for a 15" display, a Core2 duo 2.4Ghz, 200GB HDD and a Nvidia Geforce 8600M GT 256mb ram...for 2k!

I guess a more realistic statement about apple is when you buy their systems, it's a captured audience. the most expensive macbook pro is on the lower end or outside the lower end specs of an alienware system.

Apple official website

Gee whiz, have you seen how much Asus charges for their EEE and the hardware you get?

Why should Microsoft have to support 3rd party Hardware, its up to the hardware manufacturers to create drivers for the hardware. If you think Mac supports more hardware than a Windows PC then you are sorely mistaken, OSX is a closed system, you cant pick up any PCI-Express graphics card and drop it in you have to use what Apple says you can.

Sorry, I missed the part of my post where I said that.

Just to clarify:

MBP - workstation NOT gaming laptop

Wow what a crap analogy, ill bet you own a mac. You cant buy the Xbox 360 OS to run seperately so Microsoft arent forcing you to install it on their own Xbox 360 hardware like Apple is tying you to their hardware. If you could buy the 360 hardware and run any OS you wanted on it but Microsoft says you can only use their own Xbox 360 OS on their console but not anyone elses then maybe that analogy would be accurate.

Sort of backed yourself into a corner there, as you can run Windows and Linux on your Mac. They aren't forcing you to use OS X.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      83
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!