[Cancelled] Caprica (Season 1)


Recommended Posts

521546825.jpg

Angry viewers brought Jericho back on the air in 2007 by sending 20 tons of peanuts to CBS headquarters. Now distraught fans of Caprica are urging fellow loyalists to deluge Syfy execs with apples to protest the series? Wednesday cancellation.

The low-rated Battlestar Galactica prequel attracted about 1.3 million viewers when it returned for its Season 1.5 debut earlier this month. Among those who continued to tune in for the dark series was Rosemary Medrano, instigator of the Save Caprica campaign to keep the show on the air. After the show was canceled, Medrano came up with the apple stunt.

?The apple is iconic to us Caprica fans,? Medrano wrote on her blog. ?It is on basically every piece of advertising Syfy made. Buy a bag and mail them out to Steve Burke, Mark Stern and whomever else you can reach! Include a note with the STO symbol on it. I?m going to start preparing my packages tomorrow. Updates and pictures to come.?

A backlash over Caprica?s cancellation is brewing on other fronts as well. The fan-fueled Operation Airlock Facebook page urges ?an organized boycott of the SyFy network and their sponsors for the cancellation of Caprica.? Meanwhile, series actors Sasha Roiz and Alessandra Torresani have been using Twitter to rally the troops, citing a mention on CBS? Big Bang Theory and hyping the ‎#savecaprica tag.

?There?s been some serious mobilizing,? Roiz tweeted late Thursday. ?Beware the #CapricaArmy.?

?#apples #operationairlock #savecaprica #syfy #cylonarmy #capricaarmy bitches beware!!!!? chimed in Torresani.

While the viral uprising offers Caprica cultists a chance to vent, odds are slim that Syfy will have a change of heart. A Syfy spokesman told Wired.com that the network axed Caprica with reluctance.

?A decision like this is never an easy one and, believe me, we will miss this show as much as the fans,? the rep said. ?As [programming head] Mark [stern] said, we love the [battlestar Galactica] franchise, which is why we are looking to continue the story with Battlestar Galactica: Blood & Chrome.?

The Caprica brouhaha raises a larger issue addressed by many Save Caprica campaigners: For a network bearing the name Syfy, there seems to be precious little hard-core science fiction on the channel.

Save Caprica champion Michael Ilasi, editor of RedEyeRogue, told Wired.com in an e-mail that ?the problem with the Syfy channel is it?s really not about sci-fi. It?s mostly B movies and horror films and bad sci-fi television shows and wrestling and ghost-hunting. Whatever sells.?

Lacking Battlestar Galactica?s lightning-in-a-bottle storytelling chemistry, Caprica failed to capture a broad-enough audience to satisfy the Syfy braintrust. Here?s hoping Blood & Chrome proves more successful at reintroducing serious science fiction to the Syfy network.

Dunno if it's been mentioned yet but they're probably shifting all the resources that went into Caprica over to their new endeavour Battlestar Galactica: Blood & Chrome

http://www.thedeadbolt.com/news/108790/battlestar_galactica_blood_and_chrome_news.php

My opinion on the show is, it always felt like it was going to go somewhere and somehow failed every time. Totally anticlimactic.

It also felt slightly disjointed from anything in BSG. I mean, in BSG, the concept of one God was a massive new idea to everyone yet just (50?) years earlier, there was a terrorist group based on the whole notion? A massive plot hole imo.

BSG: B&C sounds like it will be BSG on steroids with any luck.

Dunno if it's been mentioned yet but they're probably shifting all the resources that went into Caprica over to their new endeavour Battlestar Galactica: Blood & Chrome

http://www.thedeadbolt.com/news/108790/battlestar_galactica_blood_and_chrome_news.php

It also felt slightly disjointed from anything in BSG. I mean, in BSG, the concept of one God was a massive new idea to everyone yet just (50?) years earlier, there was a terrorist group based on the whole notion? A massive plot hole imo.

Actually, it isn't. Why do you think the Cylons were always monotheistic?

Actually, it isn't. Why do you think the Cylons were always monotheistic?

True, that aspect of the story line links up, but when everyone in BSG learns that the Cylons are monotheistic, it's a bit of a shock to everyone, and no one ever goes... "hey, that could somehow have been linked to that terrorist group just 50 years ago!"

Or even so much as "Isn't it a bit weird that there was a terrorist group 50 years ago that only believed in one god and the Cylons do? Bizarre!"

I think the writers of Caprica wanted fans of both shows to take a far too big leap of faith in this respect, that somehow, in just 50 years, everyone has forgotten about the Soldiers of the One

  • 2 weeks later...

big fan of BSG but stopped watching caprica pilot 15 minutes in it was so bad. watched a few minutes of an episode while on vacation and it was just so terrible i had to change the channel. it's no wonder they canceled it.

I totally agree. I managed to make it through a few episodes but it sure wasn't easy to do.

Terrible show.

The spectre of "Caprica" continues to hover after its cancellation, as word came Friday that the final episodes of the series will air in a five-hour block Jan. 4, from 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. on Syfy.

So we'll get to see "Blowback, "The Dirteaters," "The Heavens Will Rise," "Here Be Dragons" and "Apotheosis" -- episode titles according to IMDB -- and we'll hope that it brings some measure of closure to the show.

Fans didn't receive much closure from the network, though. Through a Save Caprica campaign, $2,350 was raised and 2,880 apples were sent to NBC Universal head honcho Steve Burke in an effort to keep the show on the air. Sometimes fan protest works; this time it didn't. The network went ahead and allowed the produce to be donated to City Harvest in the name of Syfy and NBC Universal.

Feeding stomachs, but no longer our imagination. Oh well, onward to "Battlestar Galactica: Blood and Chrome."

I just can't see them finishing the story in 5 episodes. It's possible, but it would definitely feel rushed. They should have just given a 13 episode season to finish it off properly.

there's 2 episodes left and its building to a massive crescendo that I am sure won't be conclusive...I HOPE syfy just give them a 90 minute episode to film to finish it.

  • 2 weeks later...

Wait a minute. What the frak? How did the Graystones create skin jobs? They came after the FF came to the Colonies during the first war.

Zoe's new body wasn't a true skin-job. The difference is the one's the final five made were pretty much indistinguishable from human but this one just the way you can see the skin forming to her face as she sits up is enough to suggest hers is probably clearly not-human. No organs, lack of blood, aging, etc.

And since no-one else has said it...awesome finale. Makes me both happy it got a great ending and wistful for what could have been.

epic ending, it makes me mad that Syfy cancelled this show with an ending like that...the ultimate build up! frak you syfy frak you to the earth! :cool:

919262197.png

700153713.png

the twist was awesome as well! :D

maybe and this is a BIG MAYBE the last 5 minutes of the WHOLE SHOW worth a lil. Yes the last 5 minutes of the last episode. All that religion crap finally is over but they couldnt take it away even in that last 5 minutes. All that bullcrap kill the show. And all that stupid and non sence drama, without any direction. Two big slaps across the face to any galactica fan. Finally you wont see people smoking like crazy, and they move that to the next level, doing the teenagers smoke. How sick was that. They should seriously ask themself to what target was this pointed because drama and religion wont be favorites topics to an 'adult' audience. And with that excuse, sell'em what the adult and corrupt people consume, aka cigarretes and ****.

A whole shame was this series, every second that was in the air, thats what it was, a shame.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!