Recommended Posts

Virtualisation specialist VMware announced sluggish growth for the second quarter of 2008 and anticipated slow expansion for the near future as businesses hold back from signing large deals.

Service revenue was up 85 per cent, totalling $172m (?86.2m), while software licence revenue rose by 39 per cent to $284m (?142.4m) from the same period last year. Total revenue for the period failed to meet market expectations and reached $456m (?228.7m), up 54 per cent from the second quarter of 2007.

As Microsoft launches its own HyperV virtualisation product, increased market pressure will force VMware to start giving away its core product ESXi hypervisor available for downloading from 28 July.

Earlier this year VMware announced plans to freely embed ESXi into X86 server hardware from Dell, HP and others.

I know that Microsoft can afford to play a long waiting game," said Paul Maritz, chief executive at VMware. However, in markets where another company already has a sizable lead - as VMware does in virtualisation - it can be " really hard to catch [up] even for Microsoft," he said.

Market sources believe the move is intended as a channel to sell more profitable products and help the company fend off competition, although VMware says that the decision is part of the companys overall transition in the market to providing the management tools that organisations use to control and manage their virtual infrastructures, rather than being just a hypervisor provider.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/vdunet/20080723/t...re-6315470.html

UPDATE: It's out: http://www.vmware.com/go/getesxi

Edited by Si
Software has been released
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/650894-vmware-to-turn-esxi-into-freeware/
Share on other sites

It does have a console, you just have to run it on a remote computer. Think of it like Server 2008 Core with the MMC snapins on remote servers.

Aah so you're the guy with the name I tried to take :p great minds eh

Is this like a proper GUI console? When you set the server up (at the server) is that all CLI?

Aah so you're the guy with the name I tried to take :p great minds eh

Is this like a proper GUI console? When you set the server up (at the server) is that all CLI?

It is a proper GUI management console but it still takes some learning (quite a bit different from their consumer level stuff). When you set up the server it is a menu based text interface so getting it set up is fairly easy.

Yep you use a proper GUI with console access etc on your desktop or laptop. The ESXi server has a simple text-mode menu. There is no CLI everything apart from IP settings etc is done remotely with the VMware infrastructure client.

vi3_ncpus.png

And yeah, it's mine :p

ESXi has been planned to be given free for a couple months already, however it's only the base product (worth $400/500 I believe), a bit like HyperV, very basic, if you need the full capabilities of ESX Enterprise (V-Motion, etc) you'll have to pay for them

Yep you use a proper GUI with console access etc on your desktop or laptop. The ESXi server has a simple text-mode menu. There is no CLI everything apart from IP settings etc is done remotely with the VMware infrastructure client.

And yeah, it's mine :p

Thanks for that, i'll give it a go :)

We currently have about 25 servers running on 3 windows 2003 vmware-server 1.06 boxes, would this make a worthwhile upgrade in a production environment?

We are looking to go ESX Enterprise come January so I presume our current images will be easy to import to ESXi and again to Enterprise?

Balls, i'll have to do some research into that. I was hoping, since vmware server 2 has the option to upgrade the images but cant downgrade, that this might have something similar.

Perhaps using vmware converter to migrate the os to a new image compatible with ESX? Or would converting an os inside an image of a previously converted server unleash all kinds of pain?

Balls, i'll have to do some research into that. I was hoping, since vmware server 2 has the option to upgrade the images but cant downgrade, that this might have something similar.

Perhaps using vmware converter to migrate the os to a new image compatible with ESX? Or would converting an os inside an image of a previously converted server unleash all kinds of pain?

We just upgraded to ESXi (bah bought from HP for $719+tax less than a month ago!) from VMWare Server 1.0.4

Heres how to make the transition easy, assuming all your disks use LSILogic or BusLogic drives:

Create a new VM in ESXi, use "Custom" and select don't create a disk.

On your vmware server host, use "vmware-vdiskmanager -r (source disk path) -t 2 (destination disk path)" to convert your disk to "monolithicFlat"

Open "disk.vmdk" it is just a text file

Change "monolithicFlat" to "vmfs" and change "FLAT" (note the case!) below that to "vmfs".

Upload the disk to the new VM location in the datastore. Edit hardware, add drive, use existing disk, power on virtual machine and you're good to go. No need to pay for vmware converter. (takes a little while to convert, but hey, beats the licensing cost)

It's almost too easy. Had the server installed and congured inside 15mins, used vmware converter to convert a vmware server image to an esxi one and import it into the server and had it online within another 20mins. I guess the downside to the free converter is you can't to do mass conversions, but it suits the amount of machines I need to do.

It's miles better than vmware server so if you have a compatible box theres no reason not to be using it.

Edited by Si_
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!