Massachusetts Woman Commits Suicide Before Home Foreclosure


Recommended Posts

TAUNTON, Mass. ? A 53-year-old wife and mother fatally shot herself shortly after faxing a letter to her mortgage company saying that she'd be dead by the time they foreclosed on her house that day.

Police said that Carlene Balderrama used her husband's high-powered rifle to kill herself Tuesday afternoon, shortly after faxing the letter at 2:30 p.m.

The mortgage company called police, who found Balderrama's body at 3:30 p.m. The auction was scheduled to start at 5 p.m. and interested buyers arrived at the property in Taunton, about 35 miles south of Boston, while Balderrama's body was still inside, according to Taunton police chief Raymond O'Berg.

Police did not immediately release the name of the mortgage company. O'Berg said Balderrama's fax read, in part, "By the time you foreclose on my house I'll be dead."

O'Berg also said a suicide note found next to Balderrama told her husband, John, and 24-year-old son to "take the (life) insurance money and pay for the house."

Joe Whitney, who works with Balderrama's husband, a plumber, said that Balderrama handled the bills and her husband didn't know about the foreclosure.

"John didn't even know about it, that's the surprise," Whitney said told The Boston Globe. "It's just one of those awful, awful tragic events."

source

Ugh, hate reading about stuff like this. No financial reasons are enough to take your own life, yes she stuffed up but I think this is a cowardly thing to do. I'm a strong believer in suicide being a cowardly, selfish act.

Do you even get life insurance money when its a suicide? I was always under the idea that in that case you didn't get the full amount

yeah, I was always under the impression it covered accidental death or terminal illness?

From what I remember there are some insurance companies that do cover suicide. Because of teenagers who commit suicide they will pay out a certain amount to cover the burial, and funeral costs. But If I remember correctly they usually end up not paying that much out to pay for anything else besides just the basic funeral necessities.

She gave up her life so that her husband and son would still have a home.

Hardly 'selfish'. :no:

Maybe not applicable to this case, but I think its selfish for someone to jump in front of a car or train, jump off a building, hang yourself etc etc

I say this because commiting such an act means that someone will find you, have to clear it up and deal with the persons death, causing potential mental scarring. In the case of cars and trains, the poor driver has to deal with the fact the vehicle they were in charge of killed someone. The aftermath often requires everything is stopped to clear up, causing massive delays and generally holding everyone up.

Poor long term financial planning and/or not delving into the mortgage contract thoroughly enough are probably what snowballed into the foreclosure. In any case, losing a property is hardly the end of the world; so I feel no sympathy for this cowardly act which was evidently perceived as heroic by herself. Furthermore, as some of us have pointed out, there will probably be no insurance money. What a twist to her master-plan... I feel bad for the husband and son, particularly for having a wife and mother that doesn't even know what the price of her life is, both figuratively and literally.

~For insurance, the ads on TV in Australia often say "accidental death only for first 12 months" or "suicide not covered for first 12 months" and you get full cover afterwards. U.S could be similar.

Agree with Hum there.

Tragic thing to happen, though. :(

~For insurance, the ads on TV in Australia often say "accidental death only for first 12 months" or "suicide not covered for first 12 months" and you get full cover afterwards. U.S could be similar.

Agree with Hum there.

Tragic thing to happen, though. :(

yes, most US Insurance Policies have a Suicide Clause...and its sad...but she probably knew well in advance enough to 'create' and electrical short and claim homeowners....then tell the Mortgage Company to FO and build a new life.

In some cases and states insurance does cover suicide. The payment is typically lower than if the person had died from murder or illness, but there is a payout. It's like that in Nebraska.

I feel sorry for this woman's family and I can't believe she felt this was the last option for her. Home foreclosures are truly getting out of control and it's a scary situation.

Poor long term financial planning and/or not delving into the mortgage contract thoroughly enough are probably what snowballed into the foreclosure. In any case, losing a property is hardly the end of the world; so I feel no sympathy for this cowardly act which was evidently perceived as heroic by herself. Furthermore, as some of us have pointed out, there will probably be no insurance money. What a twist to her master-plan... I feel bad for the husband and son, particularly for having a wife and mother that doesn't even know what the price of her life is, both figuratively and literally.

You're pathetic. How many peoples long term financial planning covers Bush ruining our economy? Or $4 gas? And, god forbid, if you use your brain and read, the husband said she took care of the bulls. So I am quite sure she knows what is and isn't covered in her life insurance since she is probably the one that bought it. As many previously said, most states just have a 2 year suicide clause.

Well, my long term financial planning covers it, and then some....so...yeah..., not so pathetic here. As for the woman's bills, what exactly does 'taking care of them mean? Evidently it means hiding them so that her family isn't even aware of a FORECLOSURE. You can disagree with my statement, but gosh, man, how can you possibly defend her?

  • 1 month later...

This is truly sad.

I wonder if they received the insurance money? My first impression lead me to think that the foreclosure would be terminated, I don't know how many people would want to buy a house where someone killed their self in because it was going taken from them.

She gave up her life so that her husband and son would still have a home.

Hardly 'selfish'. :no:

Her committing suicide is just adding to this families problems, it will not stop the foreclosure. There is never a valid reason to commit suicide. The people that do this have no idea of how it affects the family that is left behind. Especially children.

What she did was pretty selfish, even if she was trying to get her Life Insurance payout for her family.

Her husband and son knew nothing of what was going on, and they can be nothing short of devastated right now. Her husband will now have to go on without his companion. Her son will never have a mother again.

Losing a home because the economy is in the ****** is tragic, but it's no excuse to put your family through the worst pain they can possibly know. It would have been better if she just told her family about the forclosure. They could have supported each other through the rough time of finding a new home, and they would all be ok in the long run. That can't happen now, and that's the real tragedy.

RIP

That's a nice sentiment, but I don't know how any one can rest in Hell.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!