Recommended Posts

Terrible Bass, Ever worse EQ, and generally crap Sound Quality. the IPOD, which is supposed to be a MP3 player, its rubbish in this respect. There are much faster interfaces out there, even though the iPod's interface is slick, there are much much better interfaces for speed and getting what you want quickly.

iPods these days are fine as a source. The actual phones you use will make the largest difference.

Remember that the touch has no physical controls like all other iPods, this is one reason I have been erring towards the iPhone. The iPhone has volume buttons and a neat headphone controller to change tracks - if you use the touch you'll have to get it out whenever you want to change track or the volume and can't do anything through your pocket or whatever. Hope I'm not sounding too negative.

Terrible Bass, Ever worse EQ, and generally crap Sound Quality. the IPOD, which is supposed to be a MP3 player, its rubbish in this respect. There are much faster interfaces out there, even though the iPod's interface is slick, there are much much better interfaces for speed and getting what you want quickly.

Well, I hadn't really noticed. See, I use mine as an MP3 player, not as a high-end stereo system. Although Apple's headphones really, truly suck, any $15 pair will give much better sound.

But honestly, the sound quality doesn't need to be fantastic. It's a mobile music player. If I want high-fidelity, I'll buy a $2000 Bose system.

Knowing Apple, and how they like to come out with new versions of everything over a short time period, do you think they will come out with a new iTouch by the end of the year? Or do you think they'll have a price cut?

By the way, thank you everyone for your input, it's greatly appreciated and is helping me a lot to better understand if i should get it or not.

Knowing Apple, and how they like to come out with new versions of everything over a short time period, do you think they will come out with a new iTouch by the end of the year? Or do you think they'll have a price cut?

By the way, thank you everyone for your input, it's greatly appreciated and is helping me a lot to better understand if i should get it or not.

Maybe not a new Touch, but at least price drops/capacity increases are likely.

If your buying it for just internet then maybe look into the http://www.nseries.com/index.html#l=products,n810

the nokia 810. Its $100 more but you can install android onto it and it has a gps chip.

I have the ipod touch with 2.0 on it and it is pretty good. I think the ipod touch is worth it just for the apps alone.

iPods these days are fine as a source. The actual phones you use will make the largest difference.

Go listen to an Sony A829. Then come back.... You wouldn't think there is a difference in source but its the biggest difference I've ever had. No matter how good the headphones are, if they are receiving a crap signal then what?

I use Future Sonics Atrio Headphones, hardly rubbish.

Maybe not a new Touch, but at least price drops/capacity increases are likely.

That would be out of line with what Apple does with iPods. I feel they tend to introduce new versions as the same price as the older ones so they don't have to lower the price. I don't follow the pricing closely, but I don't think I've ever seen a price drop on an iPod. They just seem to milk the current ones as long as possible and then introduce a new version so they have an excuse to not lower the price. And hey, it works.

Anyways, I'd definitely say get a Touch. I've had mine for about 9 months or so and haven't looked back. It's such a great device, and even moreso now that we have the AppStore.

-Spenser

Depends what you use it for. If you use it mostly in the car, then I would recommend trying one out first. I converted my old Ipaq to an mp3 player to be used in the car. It worked good for playing the music, but all the controls were on screen. So when I would want to pause it I couldn't feel where the buttons were. So I would be distracted just trying to pause the thing. Where as with my nano, you just grab it and hit pause. After that experience, I can't really see myself going with a touch based mp3 player. I need the feel physical buttons. Just something to be aware of.

If you had the Touch jailbroken there is an app called Pocket Touch, this allows gestures for things like track forward/back (slide left/right) volume up/down (slide up /down) and pause and play(screen tap), a great solution to the problems you mentioned.

Depends what you use it for. If you use it mostly in the car, then I would recommend trying one out first. I converted my old Ipaq to an mp3 player to be used in the car. It worked good for playing the music, but all the controls were on screen. So when I would want to pause it I couldn't feel where the buttons were. So I would be distracted just trying to pause the thing. Where as with my nano, you just grab it and hit pause. After that experience, I can't really see myself going with a touch based mp3 player. I need the feel physical buttons. Just something to be aware of.

QFT! I've owned a Cowon D2 and an iPAQ h1945, and they both use touch screens. A music player that uses a touch screen becomes a pain in the butt if you want to do something simple like skip a song or pause it without being able to look at it (either with it in your pocket or while you are in the car). I'd take a classic iPod or Zune 80 any day of the week over the iPod Touch, but that is all personal preference.

My iPAQ and my cellphone allow me to browse the web on the go. Whenever travel I found it useful to keep myself entertained while at an airport or whatever. My day-to-day routine doesn't benefit at all by having the web on the go to be honest. At first I thought that I would use it all the time, but the novelty wares off pretty quickly.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Hopefully this will fix the issue of no sound I have since last months stupid, and non-removable, Microsoft Corporation AudioProcessingObject Driver Update (1.0.3.56670)
    • It IS confusing! What channel are you in on each device? I'm guessing your 16GB device is on Experimental (formerly known as Dev) and your 128GB is on Beta.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!