Sony: We have the best games line-up


Recommended Posts

5413_ps3.jpg

Neil Long Today, 10:39am

‘The competition is weaker than PS3’, agrees European boss Reeves

SCEE President David Reeves has joined the debate over who ‘won’ E3 – stating that the platform holder is in confident mood after SCEA boss Jack Tretton took to the stage at the LA Expo last week.

“I think from what Jack Tretton said, the reaction has been well summarised by Yahoo, who said that in terms of games, the competition have probably got a slightly weaker line–up than PS3,” he told MCV.

“And we obviously agree with that – we think we’ve got title after title after title, not only first party but third party and I think in America they have the advantage of the video downloads service, which came at exactly the right time. “We’re confident, but not only that we’re confident about the games industry more than anything else. What we should be celebrating is how well the games industry is doing compared to other industries in the last nine months with the current recession worldwide. More and more people are coming in – it’s astounding.”

Source: MCVUK

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/651347-sony-we-have-the-best-games-line-up/
Share on other sites

I have to disagree. The PS3 recently lost FFXIII exclusivity (is that a word?), and Resident Evil 5 has been announced as multi-platform for a while now. And those are huge titles. Besides Resistance 2, I can't think of any big exclusive title for the PS3 coming out in the near future that will set it above and beyond the Wii or 360. Although I'm sure I'll be flamed...I mean "corrected"...by the fanboys in a minute.

In retrospect, they may be pretty dumb comments, but do we really expect high ranking sony employees to say otherwise?

Bill Gates will always say the latest windows is the "Best Ever"

Steve Jobs will always say the latest iCrap is "Best Ever"

I could go on

In retrospect, they may be pretty dumb comments, but do we really expect high ranking sony employees to say otherwise?

Bill Gates will always say the latest windows is the "Best Ever"

Steve Jobs will always say the latest iCrap is "Best Ever"

I could go on

Exactly, anyone who listens to this marketing bs needs their brains testing :p

Sony can't really get over the fact that even the tiny Wii is kicking the PS3's ass :laugh:

Nintendo is making money like crazy with the DS and Wii and they will be well funded for the next gen war.

In retrospect, they may be pretty dumb comments, but do we really expect high ranking sony employees to say otherwise?

Bill Gates will always say the latest windows is the "Best Ever"

Steve Jobs will always say the latest iCrap is "Best Ever"

I could go on

Specially Steve Jobs Just Watch This Video :rofl:

God, they are an embarrassment.

All sales/business men/women are, it's not just Sony! They should all learn to shut the hell up and let the hardware/games do the talking.

Truly embarrassing is something like this :- http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3446931931514285011

All sales/business men/women are, it's not just Sony! They should all learn to shut the hell up and let the hardware/games do the talking.

Truly embarrassing is something like this :- http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3446931931514285011

And this..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJElsNaC6yQ.swf

Quite the favourite quotes when we play BF:BC :rofl:

"Giant enemy tank!" "Real time weapon change and attack it's weak point for MASSIVE DAMAGE!"

Good times :p

That was bad as well, I knew one of you would post it up so I didn't bother :)

I still think the Steve Ballmer one is by far the worst.

Steve is just mental. I don't think anyone would deny it :laugh:

Sony's PR is just full of epic fail though. One embarassment after another!

And this..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJElsNaC6yQ.swf

Quite the favourite quotes when we play BF:BC :rofl:

"Giant enemy tank!" "Real time weapon change and attack it's weak point for MASSIVE DAMAGE!"

Good times :p

That was so funny, you said Massive Damage then I said, Don't forget Real Time weapon switching , then you said 'hold on switching now' then I think Sethos said Giant Enemy Tank! :laugh:

Sony really do need to just shut up and get on with the games. At this rate, its all talk and no action!

LOL @ Steve Balmer, did he take a few Red Bulls before going on the stage :s!

Because hate Sony is the latest "fad", perhaps they should get a reality distortion field like Steve Jobs does where he can announce the 2nd iteration of a product that has all the features the original should have had and has everyone bleating like sheep.

What he said is absolutely ludacris, that's how it's embarassing.

What do you expect him to turn round and say "Yeah our games lineup sucks, everyone stole our exclusives, you might as well buy a 360"?

Jesus use your common sense, he is the CEO of SCEA he WILL say that HIS console has the best games lineup.

What do you expect him to turn round and say "Yeah our games lineup sucks, everyone stole our exclusives, you might as well buy a 360"?

Jesus use your common sense, he is the CEO of SCEA he WILL say that HIS console has the best games lineup.

Somebody with some sense, finally!

Sony seem to have a fair few games up their sleeves as well, so their line-up could drastically change over the coming months.

I still think the PS line up is better than the other consoles, it's all down to personal opinion at the end of the day. MS have 2 games coming to the 360 that I want (Fable2, GoW2), nothing else.

What do you expect him to turn round and say "Yeah our games lineup sucks, everyone stole our exclusives, you might as well buy a 360"?

Jesus use your common sense, he is the CEO of SCEA he WILL say that HIS console has the best games lineup.

No, we expect them to shut up.

Sony has used up all of their life lines when it comes to embarrassing and incorrect statements.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!