Sony: We have the best games line-up


Recommended Posts

No, we expect them to shut up.

Sony has used up all of their life lines when it comes to embarrassing and incorrect statements.

Why should he shut up, hes just singing his consoles praises just like Microsoft and Nintendo are doing with theirs, what he said has had the desired effect, everyone is talking about it.

Their game line up is quite rubbish compared to the Wii's.

Please, the only thing going for Nintendo is the latest "casual" gamer fad, their massive list of shovelware 3rd party titles dont do them any favours, people buy Nintendo for Nintendo 1st party Mario and Zelda games. The rest just buy it because they are sheep and its the latest fad to have.

Call me crazy, but based off of E3 which is what this is, I actually do think Sony has the better overall GAMES lineup.

Sure, MS blew them away with the overall presentation and new additions to the console, but as far as Games, I am more Sony this year, and this could change at the drop of the dime since I am not loyal to either, I just go where the games are.

So based on their presentations, Gears Of War 2 is literally the only MS exclusive game I am concerned about.

All the other games I am interested in like RE5 & Fallout 3 that MS showed at their conference are multi platform, so I do not even count them as there is a choice. I am not a Fable person, so no huge interest in that, although I do plan on checking it out.

However, I am definitely interested in Resistance 2, SOCOM, Killzone 2, Little Big Planet, Infamous, The Agency, MAG (horribly gay name), and DC Universe.

So right there, just from my perspective as an FPS/Action type of gamer, Sony actually does have more exclusives that interest me at the moment than MS does.

Hence why I own both consoles, so I could always get the best of both worlds.

Their game line up is quite rubbish compared to the Wii's.

Only game I'm looking forward to is Animal Crossing City Folk. I'm a big fan of the series, but it looks to be a very big rehash of Wild World unfortunately :/

Other than that nothing interests me, not until at least another Zelda, Mario & Metroid comes along anyway..

Hence why I own both consoles, so I could always get the best of both worlds.

Ditto (Y)

Although I am a big FPS/Action type gamer I really like to switch the pace up a lot, so I think that's why MS are more appealing to me this year with Fable and Viva Pinata/Banjo.

Although Sony have a lot of my attention due to LBP.

Call me crazy, but based off of E3 which is what this is, I actually do think Sony has the better overall GAMES lineup.

Sure, MS blew them away with the overall presentation and new additions to the console, but as far as Games, I am more Sony this year, and this could change at the drop of the dime since I am not loyal to either, I just go where the games are.

So based on their presentations, Gears Of War 2 is literally the only MS exclusive game I am concerned about.

All the other games I am interested in like RE5 & Fallout 3 that MS showed at their conference are multi platform, so I do not even count them as there is a choice. I am not a Fable person, so no huge interest in that, although I do plan on checking it out.

However, I am definitely interested in Resistance 2, SOCOM, Killzone 2, Little Big Planet, Infamous, The Agency, MAG (horribly gay name), and DC Universe.

So right there, just from my perspective as an FPS/Action type of gamer, Sony actually does have more exclusives that interest me at the moment than MS does.

Hence why I own both consoles, so I could always get the best of both worlds.

Crazy!

I agree with you though, the PS3 has more games that I'm looking forward too. Owning both is the way to go though!!

Call me crazy, but based off of E3 which is what this is, I actually do think Sony has the better overall GAMES lineup.

Sure, MS blew them away with the overall presentation and new additions to the console, but as far as Games, I am more Sony this year, and this could change at the drop of the dime since I am not loyal to either, I just go where the games are.

So based on their presentations, Gears Of War 2 is literally the only MS exclusive game I am concerned about.

All the other games I am interested in like RE5 & Fallout 3 that MS showed at their conference are multi platform, so I do not even count them as there is a choice. I am not a Fable person, so no huge interest in that, although I do plan on checking it out.

However, I am definitely interested in Resistance 2, SOCOM, Killzone 2, Little Big Planet, Infamous, The Agency, MAG (horribly gay name), and DC Universe.

So right there, just from my perspective as an FPS/Action type of gamer, Sony actually does have more exclusives that interest me at the moment than MS does.

Hence why I own both consoles, so I could always get the best of both worlds.

:laugh:

It seems it's a place holder.

Word is the game may carry the Socom branding and end up essentially being Socom 4.

As for this news article, gaming world making mountains out of molehills over PR as usual.

I don't see why it is embarrassing, every company does it.

And in my opinion, I would agree that other consoles for the rest of this year at least have a weaker line up so far.

There are great games coming out for all consoles, well, not the Wii, but there are more that I am looking forward to on the Ps3.

I am hoping to get an Xbox360 for when Gears2 comes out, and be able to buy the past good games cheaper too. :D

However there is nothing in the future of the Wii that I want.

^^^That is such a lame excuse to defend Sony. Sony's CEO's and Marketilng have been, by far, the loudest, noisiest, and perhaps most ill-witted of any I've seen the last few years. Comment after comment after comment comes things that really, if they had any common sense, they wouldn't be saying at all. You guys keep saying others do it, but I guarantee you can't come of with anyone who's done it as much and as frequently in the last 3 or 4 years as Sony has. And besides all that, just because others do it too does not justify it at all for Sony, so really, there's not even an argument in that excuse.

Like what was said before, we don't expect them to say they have a crappy lineup, we expect them to know when to shut their mouths.

-Spenser

^^^That is such a lame excuse to defend Sony. Sony's CEO's and Marketilng have been, by far, the loudest, noisiest, and perhaps most ill-witted of any I've seen the last few years. Comment after comment after comment comes things that really, if they had any common sense, they wouldn't be saying at all. You guys keep saying others do it, but I guarantee you can't come of with anyone who's done it as much and as frequently in the last 3 or 4 years as Sony has. And besides all that, just because others do it too does not justify it at all for Sony, so really, there's not even an argument in that excuse.

Like what was said before, we don't expect them to say they have a crappy lineup, we expect them to know when to shut their mouths.

-Spenser

Were you pointing at me? :p

No one is saying that Sony have a clean record or are justifying them bitching about other consoles game lineup, but other companies do it too, maybe not as much as Sony, especially in the year running up to the Ps3 launch, it was horrible. But all companies do it none the less, so moaning at Sony is useless, no company is going to sit and say nothing.

God would interviews be boring

"so what do you think of your fall lineup?"

"oh, you know, can't really say"

It would be dreadful PR, it would come off like they had no confidence in their own products.

Everyone and every company is entitled to their own opinions, and since Sony are trying to get people to want their games and their system they are going to say they have the best line up.

But it doesn't mean you have to listen or believe them in any way, I like to think we on the forum have a little more common sense than to follow what these companies come out with half the time.

I still think the Steve Ballmer one is by far the worst.

Really? I love that ****. The best reason to go to the company meeting every year is to see Ballmer go crazy like that :p

It's why I call him Microsoft's "head coach."

It was a company event. It's not like he was doing that a press event or sales sort of thing...

^^^That is such a lame excuse to defend Sony. Sony's CEO's and Marketilng have been, by far, the loudest, noisiest, and perhaps most ill-witted of any I've seen the last few years. Comment after comment after comment comes things that really, if they had any common sense, they wouldn't be saying at all. You guys keep saying others do it, but I guarantee you can't come of with anyone who's done it as much and as frequently in the last 3 or 4 years as Sony has. And besides all that, just because others do it too does not justify it at all for Sony, so really, there's not even an argument in that excuse.

Like what was said before, we don't expect them to say they have a crappy lineup, we expect them to know when to shut their mouths.

-Spenser

QFT, Sony have really damaged themselves with this whole arogant approach that they've used the past few years.

Edited by gigapixels
Really? I love that ****. The best reason to go to the company meeting every year is to see Ballmer go crazy like that :p

It's why I call him Microsoft's "head coach."

:laugh: I think the guy's a tool. Ho hum, each to our own.

QFT, Sony have really damaged themselves with this whole arogant approach that they've used the past few years.

Yet the PS3 still has great games, is still selling well, and still has new exclusive IPs coming on board.

Hardly damaged themselves have they?

Really? I love that ****. The best reason to go to the company meeting every year is to see Ballmer go crazy like that :p

It's why I call him Microsoft's "head coach."

It was a company event. It's not like he was doing that a press event or sales sort of thing...

to be honest, I would go to an event just to see him run around like that, maybe mix it up with different types of music to see him groove out to. :p

The guy has got to be mental, lol.

It's not the amount of exclusives that matters, it's the quality of the games you present overall.

Between MS and Sony, this year looked to me like last year: MS focused on what's coming out this year, Sony showed a bit of this year and next year.

Edited by gigapixels
Yet the PS3 still has great games, is still selling well, and still has new exclusive IPs coming on board.

Hardly damaged themselves have they?

Oh not at all. Much the same way the RROD didn't damage the 360's reputation :rolleyes: :p

Give me a break and take the rose tinted glasses off for once. Of course they've damaged their reputation & sales.

Oh not at all. Much the same way the RROD didn't damage the 360's reputation :rolleyes: :p

Give me a break and take the rose tinted glasses off for once. Of course they've damaged their reputation & sales.

The RROD is slightly different to the PR nonsense that every single company spouts.

Glasses are off mate, it's raining here :(

Edited by gigapixels

We all have different views on the matter obviously, so no point going around in circles. And as we've seen on the previous page it's starting to get out of hand with some members responses. So why don't we all just agree to bow out of this discussion before it creates even more mess on the forums.

As for raining, it's 25 degrees here and sunny/hot as hell. Maybe time to migrate North? :p :laugh:

We all have different views on the matter obviously, so no point going around in circles. And as we've seen on the previous page it's starting to get out of hand with some members responses. So why don't we all just agree to bow out of this discussion before it creates even more mess on the forums.

Probably the best idea.

As for raining, it's 25 degrees here and sunny/hot as hell. Maybe time to migrate North? :p :laugh:

It's a lovely day here, though I fear going out as I don't want to melt, not use to the sun here in wales or at all, lol.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!