Mozilla reveals the Firefox of the future?

By The Canadian
in Back Page News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Veteran

The Canadian

Posted
Posted

Mozilla has unveiled a spectacular new concept browser, dubbed Aurora.

The bleeding-edge browser is part of a new Mozilla Labs initiative, in which the open-source foundation is encouraging people to contribute ideas and designs for the browser of the future.

The Aurora browser demonstration shows a highly advanced way of collaborating data gathered on the web.

Data gathered from the web - such as weather reports - are collated as 'objects' that can be dragged and dropped on to the desktop and dynamically manipulated. The video shows two people working in different offices comparing rain reports. In the demonstration Alan invites Jill to join him on a weather report page, where they each highlight important bits of the page for each other.

The video then shows Jill entering a 3D visual bookmarking system in which related pages are grouped by cells, modelled after cells in the human body. Recently opened pages appear closer to the screen, and gradually fall back the longer they're ignored.

The author searches through sports, entertainment and weather cells, as well as those of her contacts, before pulling up the page she wants and dragging it onto the existing page, where it automatically overlaps comparing the two data sets.

Potentially the most interesting thing about the video is how integrated everything appears, with desktop tasks and an instant messaging utility all linked directly into the browser interface.

Mozilla Labs

Aurora represents a spectacular introduction to the new Mozilla Labs, which much like Google Labs looks to become a home for offbeat projects which would otherwise probably never see the light of day.

Unlike Google Labs, however, Mozilla intends for the labs to encourage ideas from beyond the typical open-source development community.

"We're particularly interested in engaging with designers who have not typically been involved with open source projects," says the site. "And we're biasing towards broad participation, not finished implementations."

"Our goal is to bring even more people to the table and provoke thought, facilitate discussion, and inspire future design directions for Firefox, the Mozilla project, and the web as a whole."

To visit the labs, and watch the Aurora video click the link here.

it_portal_pic_101340.jpg

Source: PC Pro

Grand Master

Smigit

Posted
Posted

Looks pretty messy to me to be honest, especially the part in that screencapture above. Doing a quick count theres about 80 icons surrounding the screen. While somewhat sorted thats alot of images to be showing users at any one time. Secondly that pool of pages is complete garbage. Whats the point in having them fade into the Z access? Anything even just a few pages old will have no chance of being represented. Why not just use a 2d time line. Sure, it's less fancy but it does the exact same thing functionality wise without sending objects behind others on the Z axis.

Ohh and lastly that bottom bar that has current pages. Who in their right mind wouldn't have that as a flat horizontal menu. As it is in the middle of the page your losing alot of real estate to some bar.

Proficient

MR.T

Posted
Posted

That looks ridiculous. It seems to me like they are just working on a futuristic project to keep funding flowing. I'm using firefox 3.0 now, but to be honest firefox 1.0 worked just as well for everything I use my browser for. There is only so much stuff you can do with a browser before it because cluttered and annoying to use for its original purpose.

Grand Master

Rigby

Posted
Posted

Remember when Nero was a small, lightweight app that only did a few things and did them very well? Look at it now and think, in a few years Firefox will be joining it. The great thing about open source though is once they do ruin Firefox someone will just fork the last good version.

Grand Master

redvamp128

Posted
Posted
Ugh I would hate using an UI like that, looks ridiculously complicated.

That is exactly what people said about Windows 95 when Win 3.1 was king of the Hill.

They said where would I find my Icon's for programs if they were not in folders on the desktop.

Now Most people know to click on the "Start" to find them.

win31.gif

win95.gif

See the comparison.

Grand Master

+virtorio MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted
That is exactly what people said about Windows 95 when Win 3.1 was king of the Hill.

They said where would I find my Icon's for programs if they were not in folders on the desktop.

Now Most people know to click on the "Start" to find them.

win31.gif

win95.gif

See the comparison.

Another comparison is that the desktop/start menu is well organized, the Mozilla concept is a big jumbled mess.

Grand Master

Smigit

Posted
Posted
Another comparison is that the desktop/start menu is well organized, the Mozilla concept is a big jumbled mess.

Yep. They are distributed on the Z axis which makes them unusable for users since other items obscure the ones you want. It would be like if Windows folders were all put in one location rather than a grid and were allowed to overlap one another. The only way you could get to the one you actually wanted, assuming it wasn't at the top, would be to use search (as they had to in this video).

A grid layout or horizontal timeline would make sense with the time aspect scaling as needed to make sure items are as on hand as possible. Distributing icons across the Z axis for a 2d display is just a stupid idea. By going 2d no link gets obscured and it would be far more useable even if it doesn't look as cool. It could still have the quick search too.

Experienced

kaiwai

Posted
Posted
That looks ridiculous. It seems to me like they are just working on a futuristic project to keep funding flowing. I'm using firefox 3.0 now, but to be honest firefox 1.0 worked just as well for everything I use my browser for. There is only so much stuff you can do with a browser before it because cluttered and annoying to use for its original purpose.

Firefox has major issues, and unfortunately most of them appear on non-Windows platforms. Until Firefox gets these issues sorted out, quite frankly, I find these 'futuristic' a distraction from the reality that Firefox still has major issues.

Proficient

rpgfan

Posted
Posted

I don't like it. For one thing, that browser looks more like an OS with the browser embedded on the desktop or something... Finding data and superimposing it on an existing graph? I can see the point (demonstration of functionality), but do we REALLY need that in our browsers?

While I agree with the idea that browsers could use a great change, I don't think the idea showcased in the video is the way to go.

Grand Master

XerXis

Posted
Posted
You all have to remember that this is still in the planning stage. It is not ready for prime time. If and when this product is produced then slam it. What I have read here is what Edison probably heard.

great comparison! I'm sure people slammed Edison when he invented the light bulb for using the Z-axis just to be cool!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option

      By macoman · Posted

      Death on Arrival
    • Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option

      By LoneWolfSL · Posted

      Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The $1,428 option The Steam Hardware lineup that Valve announced last year is slowly starting to roll out. Following the recent Steam Controller launch, Valve has now confirmed the price of the Steam Machine, its all-in-one console-like solution for PC gaming in the living room. There are currently four variants being presented, with only the storage and the included controller being the biggest differences. All of the Steam Machines have the same internals consisting of a semi-custom AMD Zen 4 CPU with six cores and 12 threads, an RDNA 3 28CU GPU, 16GB of DDR5 memory, and 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, all inside the familiar box Valve has been showing off for months now. The Steam Machine base model starts at $1,049. This has a 512GB NVMe SSD but does not come with a Steam Controller. Keep in mind that storage can be expanded with the microSD card slot too. Next, the $1,128 model has the exact same storage as the previous one but it does come with the new Steam Controller. If you need the Steam Machine to have more storage for games and apps than that, then the 2TB tiers are also available. The $1,349 Steam Machine has no controller once again, but it does ship with two extra faceplates (red fabric and solid walnut) to replace the standard black one. The final option costs $1,428, and it adds the controller back into the bundle. The Steam Machine ships with the Linux-based SteamOS. The box has a 1 Gigabit Ethernet port, DisplayPort 1.4, and HDMI 2.0, as well as one USB-C and four USB-A ports. Keep in mind that when purchasing standalone, the Steam Controller has a $100 price tag. With the above bundles, that drops to $80. It's a rather expensive machine for the internals it is touting, though the design and small form factor do help it somewhat. However, at the same time, the lack of upgradability hurts it. Valve says the ongoing parts shortages and massive price hikes for memory were the leading causes for this price. "The overall effect is that our original goal for the price of Steam Machine is no longer viable," added the company. "So the prices we're sharing today reflect the state of the world for manufacturing; or, more accurately, it reflects the price of the components as we've secured them over the past 6 months." Valve wants interested gamers to reserve it now to get the chance to pre-order a Steam Machine starting June 25, with shipping starting on June 29. Head here to sign up. The invites to buy it will be sent in a randomized order.
    • Microsoft is building an AI datacenter that "uses less water than a fast food restaurant"

      By +TRS-80 · Posted

      What the press release doesn’t mention, however, is how much water the natural gas plant itself will consume, Natural gas plants use about 2,803 gallons of water per megawatt-hour produced, which is significantly less than coal-fired plants that use around 19,185 gallons per megawatt-hour. Overall, natural gas plants are more water-efficient, using 584% less water than traditional power plants on average. AI generated
    • AMD 26.6.2 driver brings FSR 4.1 support to RDNA 3 RX 7000 series graphics cards

      By Steven P. · Posted

      /me wonders if I should run 7800 XT tests again.
    • Politically funny images of the World

      By +primortal · Posted

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      203
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!