Mozilla reveals the Firefox of the future?


Recommended Posts

wow, the media could warp anything into anything else couldn't they!

"Mozilla has unveiled a spectacular new concept browser, dubbed Aurora. "

no they didn't. It's one concept designed by some third party for Mozilla Labs, out of what will be thousands of concepts (since the initiative just started). It's not even official...The accurate news coverage was posted just yesterday, and now there's some website spewing bull**** already. Kinda like the whole midori crap.

I like the concept, but I don't like forcing pseudo 3d onto 2d desktops, it's typically useless eye candy, and making thumbnails out of everything doesn't always translate to better usability.

Not to mention, I see some Sony XMB influences in the bookmarks demo.

Seems more suited to touch-based applications IMO.

You all have to remember that this is still in the planning stage. It is not ready for prime time. If and when this product is produced then slam it. What I have read here is what Edison probably heard.

It's a bit past planning, since they've decided to show it off to the public.

This video is meant to generate excitement about the idea. It's a crappy idea that's been tried and failed before.

As for the other part of this story, Mozilla Labs. Geez, a browser with their own "labs" website, where have I heard that before...

It's a bit past planning, since they've decided to show it off to the public.

This video is meant to generate excitement about the idea. It's a crappy idea that's been tried and failed before.

As for the other part of this story, Mozilla Labs. Geez, a browser with their own "labs" website, where have I heard that before...

Maybe so but it is far from being in an Alpha stage. BTW: House is the best show on TV! (Y)

When she pans back to the crowded desktop, the line "It's gotta be here somewhere" sums up the shortcomings of this conceptual piece. Information should be intuitively sorted and organized, not pandered to by fancy graphical interfaces and pretty icons.

Strangely I found a website, yesterday, for music player with a pretty similar concept:

http://www.formater.de/

It's an interesting concept. Even though it looks pretty messy, I 'd have to sit down with it for a while to see how well it functions. But overall I don't see an advantage this has over the present interface.

from ss looks pretty stupid. what's so wrong with wanting a simple browser with tabs and being able to bookmark and search alright on it's own. it's simple to the point and does the job we don't need fancy user interfaces and integrated clutter on the desktop and floaty thumbnails and all this sort of useless rubbish no matter how intuitive it may seem it doesn't do mainly what people are after to do what browsers do best which is simply browsing the web! not integrating into this that and the other and looking fancy or whatever.

"It's gotta be here somewhere!"

Thats the one line that got my attention and then to find it she resorted to just doing a search. Not a good line to include when trying to sell a new interface and resorting to a search doesn't help to make the UI look any cleaner either.

Yeah, I've got mixed thoughts on it.

Firstly, a wow is in order because it is something that I would love to use, but on that note, it's not something that I would love to use all the time because of what everyone has mentioned, it looks way too complicated to use as your primary web browser.

Nevertheless, excellent concept and probably a great application for someone who would be willing to learn and get to use it.

Yeah, I've got mixed thoughts on it.

Firstly, a wow is in order because it is something that I would love to use, but on that note, it's not something that I would love to use all the time because of what everyone has mentioned, it looks way too complicated to use as your primary web browser.

Nevertheless, excellent concept and probably a great application for someone who would be willing to learn and get to use it.

the concept is much more adapted to a full fledged system GUI than a browser. I don't get this trend for people to try and cram everything into a browser, even the stuff it's not supposed to touch with a 10ft pole.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This Samsung T7 external SSD deal lasts less than a day by Sayan Sen Recently we had covered some nice deals of internal NVMe SSDs which include the 4TB TeamGroup G50 for only $400, the WD_BLACK SN7100 2TB for just $243, as well as the Samsung 990 PRO 1TB for $370. If however you require an external SSD for portability and quick data transfers and have a budget of less than $200 the Samsung T7 1TB model is currently on a limited time deal at just $190, it's lowest price in nearly three months. The deal ends today so you better hurry if you need one (purchase link below). The T7 weighs in at just 72 grams meaning it should be fairly easy to carry around helping in the portability department. Via its USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface the T7 promises sequential read speeds of up to 1050 MB/s and writes of 1000 MB/s. It is also fairly robust with a drop protection of up to 2 meters, though bear in mind that this is not waterproof. For that you will have to choose the rugged T7 Shield. The technical specifications of the Samsung T7 1TB are given in the table below: Specification Value Model Code (1TB) MU-PC1T0T / MU-PC1T0H Interface USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) Dimensions (W × H × D) 85 × 57 × 8 mm Weight 72 g Sequential Read Speed Up to 1,050 MB/s Sequential Write Speed Up to 1,000 MB/s Drop Resistance Up to 2 m (6.6 ft) Encryption AES 256-bit hardware encryption Operating Temperature 0°C to 60°C Non-Operating Temperature -40°C to 85°C Humidity 5% to 95% (non-condensing) Shock Resistance 1,500 G, duration 0.5 ms, 3-axis (non-operating) Vibration Resistance 20–2,000 Hz, 20 G (non-operating) Get it at the link below: Samsung T7 Portable SSD, 1TB External Solid State Drive, MU-PC1T0T/AM, Gray: $189.98 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I just wish they would put more love into Virtual Desktops. There is just so much more they could do.
    • Sounds like you just skimmed over the review, I answer all those questions in it. Although I admit I did not test if DTS works over the headphones, when I get some time I will test this. My personal use case is more speaker-driven (I cover this in the review too).
    • It actually does the same exact thing as yours, 7.1 virtual surround over headphones. From the product page: "Experience sound that surrounds you with 7.1 virtual surround, delivering a wider, more immersive soundstage for movies, games, and music." So both of them are two channel, with 7.1 virtual surround that only work in Headphones mode.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      84
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!