The new Gamespot  

41 members have voted

  1. 1. What do guys think of the new design of Gamespot.com?

    • Wow... Very nice compared to the old one!
      20
    • Undecided...
      7
    • I prefered the old one
      2
    • I don't like Gamespot, so I don't go there a lot
      12


Recommended Posts

I was really surprised this morning when I went on Gamespot and saw the whole design had changed to something square-ish and without all the textures they put in the old version of the site... so yeah, my position in the poll, you already know it, is "I prefered the old one"

Here's what they say about it :

  • Wider layout.
  • Contextual site navigation.
  • HD video.
  • Streamlined video integration.
  • At-a-glance game details.
  • Dynamic links for related games and related content.
  • Playlist-based video hub.
  • Community hub.
  • Friend activity feed.

And here's the look of it :

site_preview.gif

I'll let you judge by yourself, and please vote directly at Gamespot if you like or dislike...

(btw I'm surprised there's no thread yet about it... I used the search but it came up to nothing)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/657628-gamespotcom-redesign/
Share on other sites

Gamespot need to stop with the paid reviews. That is what is destroying the site. I was a regular, every day visitor, but after the few "scandals" now I barely visit it.

On topic: The new design looks great. Much more gaming oriented (at least I see it that way).

By the way, if you want you could watch the WoW: WotLK live marathon tomorrow on GameSpot.

I don't see why they needed yet another redesign. The layout of the site is the least thing I'm concerned with. I'm more concerned with the shady review practices and thus the credibility of the site. That said, as similar as the design is to their old one, I actually like it. Of course, I won't be seeing all too much of it considering I've resolved to not visit the site.

To use its a hell of a load better, really like the new design. Only thing i do miss is the pros and cons review bit on a game review? i might be blind though... it used to have the pros and cons of each game on each game page, with icons... i dunno..

The pros and cons are still there, in the middle section of the page. The icons though, are in the right section, and we can only see the pros. Why, oh why are these things seperated? There's really something wrong.

Indeed it isn't wide enough on my screen either, my resolution is 1920 x 1200 (I know this is abusive, but a lot of people should have HD monitors now, maybe a smaller resolution though lol)

The best feature I've seen though, is their new video player. I mean, wow, it just fullscreened the thing on my Mac without a hiccup, when YouTube still doesn't want to most of the times, and 540p... wow! I don't know what kind of resolution this is... meaning that it's not really a standard IMO, but seriously, wow! The details are much more present and you can feel that they put some real quality in their videos.

I like it. I think it's a big step up, the old design seemed so cluttered to me. The new design seems a bit more usable. I'm not sure what the big review fiasco was about (yes, I am one of those evil "casual gamers"), but I still check out the site for release dates, synopsises, and things like that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
    • OpenAI is making Codex more useful in Chrome and the cloud by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI's Codex now has more than 5 million users, up nearly 4x from earlier this year. To further accelerate Codex's growth among developers, OpenAI today announced that it has agreed to acquire Ona, a company that builds secure cloud execution and orchestration technology for developers. Ona will enable developers to run Codex with persistent and controlled cloud infrastructure for long-running agentic workflows. Right now, most Codex execution happens locally on developers' laptops and PCs, and the agents work continuously for hours. Through Ona, OpenAI aims to make Codex agents keep working for days without being tied to a user’s local machine or an active session. This will be an important capability for enterprises that want to deploy AI agents in production while maintaining control over infrastructure, data, security boundaries, credential scope, logging, and review workflows. Like any acquisition, the deal is still subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. Until the deal closes, OpenAI and Ona will continue to operate as separate companies. After closing, Ona’s team will join the Codex team to improve developer workflows. Alongside the Ona acquisition announcement, OpenAI today introduced a few Codex updates. Developers can now save Codex rate limit resets and use them later instead of losing them when they are not needed immediately. OpenAI is also adding a referral option where users can invite a friend to Codex and get a saved rate limit reset. OpenAI today also announced a developer mode for browser use in Chrome and the Codex in-app browser. With this mode, Codex can use the Chrome DevTools Protocol to debug web apps, inspect pages, and work more directly with browser-based development workflows. Developers can use this when they want Codex to profile JavaScript, inspect console output and network traffic, examine web page states including the DOM and applied styles, and more.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      186
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!