Users to Microsoft: 'Just make Windows faster'


Recommended Posts

I know most of you on Neowin are aware of this already, because it's been discussed numerous times, but it is nice to finally get official confirmation from MS about it.

Continuing an unprecedented public dialog on the future of Windows begun last week, a Microsoft senior vice president admits that the request he's hearing most often from users is pretty simple: Speed it up.

"The most frequent request," Sinofsky wrote, "was to discuss Windows performance and/or just 'make Windows faster.' There's a lot to this topic so we expect to talk about this quite a bit over the next months."

As one blog reader TimOR commented in response to Sinofsky last Thursday, "Vista really is a dog compared to XP performance-wise and compatibility-wise. Yes, it is prettier and it has the search facility. But its UAC, networking and compatibility just sux. I always turn UAC off it is so annoying. For overall compatibility and speed XP is still the gold standard for me. I truly hope Microsoft listens to its customers and makes Windows 7 everything Vista should have been - faster, as compatible (hardware and software) and easier to use than XP. (Hey, and dump the DRM bloat too - your customers don't need it!)."

As user shadow_concept noted the following day, "I'll probably post this multiple times until it gets noticed, but I really think windows 7 needs to be a super efficient core with plug-in style features. That way, as a gamer or just someone who needs all the speed he can get I can just run windows barebones, with only the applications I need."

His was not the only message suggesting that Windows could actually use a paring down -- a removal of features from the operating system package itself, perhaps separating them into separate products or even separate downloads.

As if to demonstrate shadow_concept's very point, Sinofsky's latest message demonstrated the complexity of the Microsoft project management scheme for Windows, listing 23 separate, main "feature teams," each with development managers and program managers, and implying the existence of even more.

"Some have said that the Windows team is just too big and that it has reached a size that causes engineering problems," Sinofsky wrote. "At the same time, I might point out that just looking at the comments there is a pretty significant demand for a broad set of features and changes to Windows. It takes a set of people to build Windows and it is a big project. The way that I look at this is that our job is to have the Windows team be the right size -- that sounds cliche but I mean by that is that the team is neither too large nor too small, but is effectively managed so that the work of the team reflects the size of the team and you see the project as having the benefits we articulate."

The senior VP came dangerously close to admitting that one of the reasons systems like Windows Vista end up with so many "features" is because so many teams are in existence whose job it is to come up with those features. He suggested that perhaps "optimizations" could eliminate some of this complexity, perhaps hoping that commenters could suggest places where such optimizations could take place.

http://www.betanews.com/article/Users_to_M...ster/1219167670

Its not about speed, if you read you understand the problem, its lack of a solid system, its separated and functions not pratical. Thats why i wont use Vista, it doesnt give me anything good, just new features that i dont need to worry turning off. ;D

  EduardValencia said:
That's cool,however i'm not suffering performance issues with Vista.

Argh! It's not something that "affects some people", it's not a bug, it's not a problem in Vista.

It's a ***** fact that Vista is slower than XP. And btw. I use Vista on my laptop,

  grik said:
Its not about speed, if you read you understand the problem, its lack of a solid system, its separated and functions not pratical. Thats why i wont use Vista, it doesnt give me anything good, just new features that i dont need to worry turning off. ;D

errr.... what..

exactly! vista is a great improvement in terms of the new features/programs like the media center, photo gallery, sidebar, etc. The visual design is very very clean and next-gen for sure.

but the problem is the speed. i got linux set up to look just like vista and it is blazing fast. xmbc for media center, digikam for photo gallery etc. the additional fact that i am running beautiful 3d effects using compiz fusion on ubuntu and its still that fast is just mind blowing.. running flip3d on vista on the other hand causes lags and in reality just sucks compared to good ole alt+tab

security is a big one too. but im not soo concerned with it in its current state. i mean macs got hacked so easily in that pwn2own or summin contest. vista was still reasonably well off. What i would absolutely love to see is windows at the level of security and performance that linux has to offer right now. the only thing linux is lacking compared to windows right now is the level of sophisticated-ness and compatibility when it comes to things like drivers, etc.

Don't compare Compiz directly to the Vista DWM. yeah sure compiz is "faster". but to be faster it sacrifizes a lot of other things in terms of quality, and especially stability.

As it is compiz can run on lower hardware, but it's graphical quality is not even close to what DWM has. Yeah sure MS could have reduced the minimum graphics quality and thus lowered the minimum graphics requirements, But Since MS is an actual company who needs to offer a certain minmal level of quality and service to it's customers.it'ster for them to create a simpler system that allways delivers the quality, and f you can't support it, you are reduced to a fall back solution of the old non accelerated UI.

  The2 said:
Argh! It's not something that "affects some people", it's not a bug, it's not a problem in Vista.

It's a ***** fact that Vista is slower than XP. And btw. I use Vista on my laptop,

But that doesen't apply to me! i'm not guilty! :D\

Vista runs amazing on my 3 year old pc,not my fault!

  The2 said:
Argh! It's not something that "affects some people", it's not a bug, it's not a problem in Vista.

It's a ***** fact that Vista is slower than XP. And btw. I use Vista on my laptop,

It was released years after with the general hardware landscape advancing years, it should be slower on older hardware.

...and thats the real problem, people install Vista on terrible old slow hardware and complain it doesn't run aswell as XP.

DUH

  BilliShere said:
exactly! vista is a great improvement in terms of the new features/programs like the media center, photo gallery, sidebar, etc. The visual design is very very clean and next-gen for sure.

but the problem is the speed. i got linux set up to look just like vista and it is blazing fast. xmbc for media center, digikam for photo gallery etc. the additional fact that i am running beautiful 3d effects using compiz fusion on ubuntu and its still that fast is just mind blowing.. running flip3d on vista on the other hand causes lags and in reality just sucks compared to good ole alt+tab

security is a big one too. but im not soo concerned with it in its current state. i mean macs got hacked so easily in that pwn2own or summin contest. vista was still reasonably well off. What i would absolutely love to see is windows at the level of security and performance that linux has to offer right now. the only thing linux is lacking compared to windows right now is the level of sophisticated-ness and compatibility when it comes to things like drivers, etc.

Please don't compare Compiz to Vista. It's nice, but it's also pretty buggy on ATI systems, and it's not nearly as fluid as Aero, same goes for the awn dock. And at the heart of it, Compiz just wants to be like Expose on OSX, but outside of the cube effect for switching workspaces, the other effects in Compiz are useless. Wobbly windows and drawing water/fire on the screen do not usability make.

As far as Vista being slow, unfortunately, that's been the case with every new Windows release, I don't think MS honestly knows any better.

  hagjohn said:
Still no problem with speed here. :rolleyes: Anyone here should be able to figure out why their computer is running slow and fix it.

Exactly the same experience here. I have Windows Vista Home Premium and Windows XP SP3 installed on a relatively older machine, P4 3.0GHz w/ 1GB ram. The Vista experience is better for me. I get the same frame rates in games in Vista on that machine as I did in XP. The UI of Vista is more responsive and less prone to lockup on me (not that it was too much of a problem in XP). More organized Control Panel, a sound volume application that actually makes sense, more useful Task Monitor, better search integration, dependable sleep/hibernate features.

I don't think people complaining about Vista have actually tried to use it. They just hear everyone bitching and moaning about it, and want to jump on the bandwagon.

I honestly have used both Vista and XP inside and out on two completely different setups. My only complaint with Windows Vista is I don't like the organization of the network devices, and the "repair" function for my WiFi connections seem less useful and consistent as it did on Windows XP.

Other than that, I'm not exactly sure what other people's problems are exactly but I've come up with a theory.

A number of people have actually had problems or have installed Windows Vista on hardware well below the recommended and are persistent in telling others that because they have had problems on their particular setup, Windows Vista "sux" (which is another way of saying, I'm 12). The other vast majority of "users" who are complaining about Windows Vista have not actually tried Windows Vista. I would also call these types of people, Sheep. Baaaaaa!

Just to comment, although I'm sure many people would like a faster windows, I doubt that the average person really wants to remove features. People who say that Microsoft should remove features are usually lower end techies who blame all of the problems with Windows on the fact that you couldn't uninstall IE. In terms of applications, there isn't really much that comes bundled in windows, and it doesn't really make windows slower. Play with all the features in windows and youll get bored in 10 minutes.

  The2 said:
Argh! It's not something that "affects some people", it's not a bug, it's not a problem in Vista.

It's a ***** fact that Vista is slower than XP. And btw. I use Vista on my laptop,

What problem with Vista? It's fast for me. Maybe "some people" should upgrade their PC sometimes.

Did I lose 1 or 2 FPS in my games with Vista? Probably, but WHO CARES when you can game at 90+ FPS on most games (not Crysis) using decent GFX card & current PC hardware. I don't even have problems with all the apps that I use under Vista x64. But you know, that's only MY experience with Vista....

My guess is that most people who have "speed" problem with Vista are trying to run it on 3+ year old PC.

Ugh - not going to bite on the ignorant comments from people with multicore CPU's and gigabytes of RAM - just remeber not everyone is in the same position as you with money to spend on the latest and greatest hardware.

Even on a reasonably well specced out machine, Vista can be stodgy. I'm glad that this is something that users have managed to channel through to Microsoft and I hope it is feedback they take onboard for Windows7. Vista looks great, has some nice features, but often it feels like you're wading through treacle when using it - it needs to feel a bit fresher than it currently does.

  abcdefg said:
Why it wouldn't run well on 3 year old PC? Is it ****ing bloated?

OH GOD, you're so right, it's bloated....

That's probably the reason why Vista just can't run on my 486DX2/66Mhz.... DANG, it should, I love that PC.... DAMN YOU Microsoft!

  abcdefg said:
Why it wouldn't run well on 3 year old PC? Is it ****ing bloated?

Whatever would make Vista slower isn't bloat.

The added features are things you can turn off with options, like Aero and UAC. And if you use Aero with a graphics card, and you have sufficient memory, it should actually run faster because it uses the GPU instead of the CPU.

My computer runs perfectly fast with Vista, even though it has the memory and processor other people claim it should run slow on (single core 2gb ram).

Some benchmark tests have actually shown Vista doesn't noticeably run slower.

But if it does on some systems, its likely because the core ways in which the system operates---for things like security, memory caching, etc---have been changed to take advantage of modern technology.

Like i said, the "bloat" can be turned off.

OS have matured, just look at XP, Vista, OS X. How much more can you really improve it with today's technology and hardware? Also, it's really hard for MS to make an OS that satisifes everyone, it's not like Apple and their "closed system." MS would have to take their next OS to a new level...

Also, Vista and XP provide great speed for me and I've run both on a laptop from 2005.

  The Grinch said:
well duh, vista was designed for multicores and gigabytes of ram. That is the new technology right? Why stick with old single processors? or just stick with your old outdated pc and os since it's all you can afford, and quit complaining. Just accept life for what it is.

My quad core pc with 3 gigs of ram was under $1,000. isn't much money at all.

Hey - i'm fortunate enough to be in a position where I can spend pretty much whatever I want on a home computer too. But the majority of people have real lives to worry about with real expenses and other such issues in their life and a computer often isn't something they're prepared to spend even $1,000 on - and understandably slow.

You just have to be able to understand all possible sides of the argument and sometimes comments are so unbelievably narrow / blinkered that it's hard not to get frustrated!

It isn't down to Microsoft to govern the pace of hardware replacement amongst its userbase - the userbase should govern what IT wants from its OS provider. The customer is always right, right? If (for example) 60% of customers are home users with older computers, Microsoft should be making the OS work best for them - not for the smaller percentage of power users simply because MS want to push hardware sales with the companies that it is most friendly with.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • LibreOffice 25.2.4 by Razvan Serea LibreOffice is the free power-packed Open Source personal productivity suite for Windows, Macintosh and Linux, that gives you six feature-rich applications for all your document production and data processing needs: Writer, Calc, Impress, Draw, Math and Base. Support and documentation is free from our large, dedicated community of users, contributors and developers. You, too, can also get involved! Choosing Between LibreOffice Still and LibreOffice Fresh: LibreOffice Still is a good choice if you value stability, a longer support cycle, and a more conservative approach to software updates. It's suitable for businesses and organizations where reliability and compatibility are crucial. LibreOffice Fresh is ideal if you're an enthusiast or an early adopter who wants to stay on the cutting edge of LibreOffice development and is willing to accept more frequent updates and occasional minor issues. Features: Writer is the word processor inside LibreOffice. Use it for everything, from dashing off a quick letter to producing an entire book with tables of contents, embedded illustrations, bibliographies and diagrams. The while-you-type auto-completion, auto-formatting and automatic spelling checking make difficult tasks easy (but are easy to disable if you prefer). Writer is powerful enough to tackle desktop publishing tasks such as creating multi-column newsletters and brochures. The only limit is your imagination. Calc tames your numbers and helps with difficult decisions when you're weighing the alternatives. Analyze your data with Calc and then use it to present your final output. Charts and analysis tools help bring transparency to your conclusions. A fully-integrated help system makes easier work of entering complex formulas. Add data from external databases such as SQL or Oracle, then sort and filter them to produce statistical analyses. Use the graphing functions to display large number of 2D and 3D graphics from 13 categories, including line, area, bar, pie, X-Y, and net - with the dozens of variations available, you're sure to find one that suits your project. Impress is the fastest and easiest way to create effective multimedia presentations. Stunning animation and sensational special effects help you convince your audience. Create presentations that look even more professional than the standard presentations you commonly see at work. Get your collegues' and bosses' attention by creating something a little bit different. Draw lets you build diagrams and sketches from scratch. A picture is worth a thousand words, so why not try something simple with box and line diagrams? Or else go further and easily build dynamic 3D illustrations and special effects. It's as simple or as powerful as you want it to be. Base is the database front-end of the LibreOffice suite. With Base, you can seamlessly integrate into your existing database structures. Based on imported and linked tables and queries from MySQL, PostgreSQL or Microsoft Access and many other data sources, you can build powerful databases containing forms, reports, views and queries. Full integration is possible with the in-built HSQL database. Math is a simple equation editor that lets you lay-out and display your mathematical, chemical, electrical or scientific equations quickly in standard written notation. Even the most-complex calculations can be understandable when displayed correctly. E=mc2. LibreOffice also comes configured with a PDF file creator, meaning you can distribute documents that you're sure can be opened and read by users of almost any computing device or operating system. LibreOffice also comes configured with a PDF file creator, meaning you can distribute documents that you're sure can be opened and read by users of almost any computing device or operating system. Download: LibreOffice 64-bit | LibreOffice 32-bit ~300.0 MB (Open Source) View: LibreOffice Website | Screenshot | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I'm not sure why, but for some reason I think that if they are deciding to use the year for the version history they should use the whole year (i.e. iOS 2026).
    • Here's why it makes sense to name it iOS 26 and why it doesn't by Aditya Tiwari It has been almost 18 years since Apple launched the first version of its popular mobile operating system alongside the original iPhone. Recent reports and rumors circulating on the web suggest that the company is all set to unveil a major overhaul for iOS 19 at this year's WWDC keynote. There is something that baffled many when they found that the Cupertino giant is reportedly planning to rename iOS 19 to iOS 26. Yes, a company like Apple skipping eight versions for iOS is enough to leave users with a "why?" expression on their face. However, even if Apple pulls it off, there are two sides to the coin. Why it makes sense to call it iOS 26 There are several reasons why calling it iOS 26 instead of iOS 19 isn't as weird as it sounds. To begin with, it's something that has been done in the past. Samsung is a well-known example when we think about renaming device lineups and skipping version numbers. Samsung launched the Galaxy S20 series in 2020. But what was its predecessor? Galaxy S19? No, it was the Galaxy S10. The South Korean giant renamed its device lineup and aligned it with the year of launch, jumping ten versions in the process. So, someone viewing a Galaxy S23 can easily determine that the device was launched in 2023. It also gives them a feeling that they are using the 'latest and greatest' product. On the flip side, a device from the previous year may feel outdated, potentially motivating them to upgrade. Skipping version numbers isn't fun and games for everyone. Microsoft became the butt of jokes when it skipped Windows 9 and announced that Windows 8.1 will be upgraded to Windows 10 (that too in 2015). Windows 10 was thought to be "the last version of Windows", but things turned out differently. Apple's case would be a bit different, where the iOS version number is one year ahead. So, iOS 26 will release in 2025, iOS 27 in 2026, and so on. This approach is similar to how game companies like Electronic Arts name their gaming titles. Although it may seem off track, the naming scheme aligns with Apple's development schedule. The company typically announces new iOS versions at WWDC in June and rolls them out to the public in the fall season. After that, it continues to push incremental updates through the following year. In other words, a particular iOS version lives on your iPhone for a quarter of the launch year and about nine to ten months in the following year. Meanwhile, Samsung releases new Galaxy S devices at the start of the year, so it makes more sense to align their name with the current year. Not just iOS 26, reports said that Apple will streamline its confusing software naming system by renaming almost all of its operating systems to a single version. So, there will be iPadOS 26, macOS 26, tvOS 26, and watchOS 26 instead of iPadOS 19, macOS 16, tvOS 12, and so on. While the big move will make things easier for users, it will also highlight the work Apple has been doing to unify its software experience across devices. iOS and iPadOS have been related to each other from the beginning, but macOS gained ARM support in 2020 and began incorporating iOS-like UI elements. Apple has already developed a suite of Continuity features that enable different Apple devices to work together. macOS 14 Sonoma further bridged the gap between iPhone and Mac in 2023 with a revamped widgets picker UI, which allows access to and syncing with widgets stored on your iPhone. New widgets introduced in macOS 14 are interactive, similar to those on iPhone. They let you do stuff like checking off reminders, playing or pausing media, accessing smart home controls, and more. Apple's iOS 26/iOS 19 would be the second major naming shake-up in the history of iOS. The first one was when Apple renamed the operating system from iPhone OS to iOS in June 2010. iOS 26 is expected to be the biggest update in years, reportedly featuring a 'dramatic' glass-like UI overhaul, a revamped Camera app, live translation for AirPods, a new gaming app, and a new set of accessibility features. The glass-like design, first introduced on Apple's Vision Pro headset, is expected to make its way to tvOS and watchOS. Why doesn't it make sense to call it iOS 26 It already feels a bit awkward when you realize that the iPhone 16 runs iOS 18, for whatever reason, when the first iterations of both iPhone and iOS arrived in the same year. Adding eight more digits to the iOS version number will make it sound even weirder. The 19th generation of iPhone's operating system will be called iOS 26. Imagine buying an iPhone 17 later this year, and it runs iOS 26 out of the box. However, there are a couple of things Apple can do to tone down the awkwardness. Perhaps Apple can rename the iPhone series and start calling it iPhone 26 to match its software counterpart. A far-fetched and even more unlikely option is to drop version numbers from the iPhone's name entirely. Apple is already doing it for its tablets (iPad, iPad Pro, and iPad Air) and its Mac computers. Therefore, it won't be an issue once the users absorb the initial shock of the announcement. But we can't ignore that not having a version number tied to a product has its downsides. These are all speculations anyway. Whatever happens, Apple fans will get over it and learn to live with it, like they are living with the hopes of an upgraded Siri and AirPower to charge their Apple devices together.
    • I'd prefer the disclaimer being more transparent by putting it above the article.
    • dBpoweramp Music Converter 2025-06-05 by Razvan Serea Audio conversion perfected, effortlessly convert between formats. dBpoweramp contains a multitude of audio tools in one: CD Ripper, Music Converter, Batch Converter, ID Tag Editor and Windows audio shell enhancements. Preloaded with essential codecs (mp3, wave, FLAC, m4a, Apple Lossless, AIFF), additional codecs can be installed from [Codec Central], as well as Utility Codecs which perform actions on audio files. After 21 days the trial will end, reverting to dBpoweramp Free edition (learn the difference between Reference and dBpoweramp Free, here). dBpoweramp is compatible with Windows 10, 8, 7, Vista, both 32 and 64 bit. dBpoweramp Music Converter features: Convert audio files with elegant simplicity. mp3, mp4, m4a (iTunes / iPod), Windows Media Audio (WMA), Ogg Vorbis, AAC, Monkeys Audio, FLAC, Apple Lossless (ALAC) to name a few! Multi CPU Encoding Support Rip digitally record audio CDs (with CD Ripper) Batch Convert large numbers of files with 1 click Windows Integration popup info tips, audio properties, columns, edit ID-Tags DSP Effects such as Volume Normalize, or Graphic EQ [Power Pack Option] Command Line Encoding: invoke the encoder from the command line DSP Effects - process the audio with Volume Normalize, or Sample / Bit Rate Conversion, with over 30 effects dBpoweramp is a fully featured mp3 Converter dBpoweramp integrates into Windows Explorer, an mp3 converter that is as simple as right clicking on the source file >> Convert To. Popup info tips, Edit ID-Tags are all provided. dBpoweramp Music Converter 2025.06.05 changelog: Darkmode added Core Converter Debug log dumps ID Tags written VST Effect Folders dialog fixed missing InitCommonControls would not show correctly FLAC/Ogg/Opus/etc - allows editing of CDTOC ID Tag CD Ripper secure ripping log where shows TOC was not showing CD Extra correctly CD Ripper was incorrectly setting data track length on main display (for certain drives) CD Ripper internally better handling of corrupt TOCs CD TOC to Tag was incorrectly adding 150 to CD Extra disc CD Ripper shows "AccurateRip Unconfigured" in rip status rather than "not in accuraterip" if unconfigured CD Ripper art paste accepts https CueSheet added as standard - log file written to same folder as cue and folder.jpg AIFF internal code merge (macos >> windows) Download: dBpoweramp Music Converter R2025.06.05 | 82.2 MB (Shareware) View: dBpowerAMP Music Converter Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      abortretryfail earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Mr bot earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      Bkl211 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      Mido gaber earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      Vladimir Migunov earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      snowy owl
      255
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      252
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      227
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      191
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!