Intel revolutionizes the electric world


Recommended Posts

Intel cuts electric cords with wireless power system

Intel on Thursday showed off a wireless electric power system that analysts say could revolutionize modern life by freeing devices from transformers and wall outlets.

Intel chief technology officer Justin Rattner demonstrated a Wireless Energy Resonant Link as he spoke at the California firm's annual developers forum in San Francisco.

Electricity was sent wirelessly to a lamp on stage, lighting a 60 watt bulb that uses more power than a typical laptop computer.

Most importantly, the electricity was transmitted without zapping anything or anyone that got between the sending and receiving units.

"The trick with wireless power is not can you do it; it's can you do it safely and efficiently," Intel researcher Josh Smith said in an online video explaining the breakthrough.

"It turns out the human body is not affected by magnetic fields; it is affected by elective fields. So what we are doing is transmitting energy using the magnetic field not the electric field."

Examples of potential applications include airports, offices or other buildings that could be rigged to supply power to laptops, mobile telephones or other devices toted into them.

The technology could also be built into plugged in computer components, such as monitors, to enable them to broadcast power to devices left on desks or carried into rooms, according to Smith.

"Initially it eliminates chargers and eventually it eliminates batteries all together," analyst Rob Enderle of Enderle Group said of Intel's wireless power system.

"That is potentially a world changing event. This is the closest we've had to something being commercially available in this class."

Previous wireless power systems consisted basically of firing lightning bolts from sending to receiving units.

Smith says Intel's wireless power system is still in an early stage of development and much research remains before it can be brought to market.

Rattner spoke of technological transformations he expects by the year 2050.

"You'd like to cut the last cord," Smith said.

"It's great that we have wireless email and wireless internet and stuff like that but at the end of the day it would be nice to have wireless recharge as well."

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jn6duu...6ByZ1wuv389gooQ

I want one, you have no idea the amount of times when I am outside I had to frantically search for a power point when my battery is low.

Scirwode

I wonder what effect this would have on an electrical device that was caught in the cross fire that didn't support wireless electricity. Everyone knows what happens if you put a magnet near a CRT screen. Surely pumping a magnetic field near it will cause exactly the same distortions.

Also, for the record, the effects of magnetic fields on people isn't something that is truly understood. Tests have shown that magnetic fields can affect eyesight and your heart. Another theory is that magnetism can affect our central nervous system. Think of your nerves as a bunch of wires - in the right magnetic field, a current in these wires can be induced.

Nobody really knows if there are negative (or positive) affects of any of that, but there is evidence of a connection between magnetism and the human body.

Did you actually read the post? I transfers energy using MAGNETIC fields NOT electric... human bodies are not affected by Magnetic fields..

Electric and Magnetic fields are two sides of the same coin. To be honest, it's possibly just the way we developed our notation and understanding of the phenomenon that led us to separate the two like we do.

For instance, if I'm walking next to a stationary magnetic field, I will see a small electric field developing. They're both electromagnetic fields being carried by photons.

Furthermore, there's really not too much evidence that the human body is affected by non-ionizing frequencies of electric fields. Ever stood anywhere where there's this pesky 'light' thing? You're being surrounded by a massive electric field! The only thing that we know happens is that you might heat up a little bit. For instance, infrared and below can penetrate further into your body than visible light, but they just cause a little bit of warming.

In any case, this is just inductive coupling. This is how electric toothbrushes are charged, and we've been using it for decades. Tesla did a ton of experiments with it, and it's also very close to how we power and read RFID chips. It's nothing new.

Edited by MioTheGreat
Intel revolutionizes the electric world!

Not really.

In 2007 Marin Soljačić and his assistants successfully made the first efficient non-radiative power transfer at a distance of 2 meters turning on a 60 W light bulb. Energy transfer was 40% percent efficient.

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2007/wireless-0607.html

http://web.mit.edu/physics/facultyandstaff...n_soljacic.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marin_Solja%C4%8Di%C4%87

This had to come. They might only be able to power a lightbulb now, but I can't wait for it to be able to power a laptop

Would it be possible though to use a sort of magnetic equivalent of a cantenna to steal wireless power?

I rather not have wireless power, there's enough radioactive waves my brain has to endure.

There are no radioactive waves, it's done using magnets, which like it or not you're subjected to every day from gravity.

Assuming by then we don't come up with something that prevents the aging process. :p

i do rather went to slow down the process rather then to stop aging :)

it doesnt bother me to be elder at some point , but i hope to stay healthy

mmmm 2050 we would had intel ultra small die shrink 2nm which will have enogh cores for every function of the pc

and ATi HD55870X8 :p

will neowin stand the test of time ..... ?

i would be 4ever with neowin ;) who about you guys :D

I rather not have wireless power, there's enough radioactive waves my brain has to endure.

Oh c'mon, the human body isn't weak. Our bodies endure different types of radiation everyday. UV radiation for example, and even cosmic radiation (to an extent). Also, the technology is based on the use of magnetic fields to generate electricity. That doesn't have any longterm or short-term effects on the body. Heck, the Earth is one giant magnet generating one giant magnetic field. We're still alive, no?

Don't let the wind blow off your tinfoil hat! :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!