Windows 7 -- Approach to System Performance


Recommended Posts

Business, Home, Home Ultimate, Server

That's all they need todo.

Business should be cut down, no sparkly effects, just raw performance and ease of use

Home should be basic, a few effects here and there but again performance focused for standard families.

Home ultimate should be the best looking version of them all, many effects, gaming performance mode, lots of extras

Server, standard server edition

(Y)

Good. Let's get rid of Basic. It's useless. Same for Vista Ultimate. I purchased it, and I don't know but it's no better than Home Premium.

Low end SKUs should definetely be canceled in certain markets or controlled carefully. Do you know how many small OEMs here put Vista Starter Editions in their cheap boxes to save a couple of bucks, where they would even probably run Home Premium? You should of see the faces of people when I told them it was an OS limitation after they asked me why they can't run more than 3 programs at the same time. Definetely not a good marketing image for Microsoft, is it?

It is impossible for Microsoft to have only one SKU of Windows. It would cost billions of dollars to give up even one of the existing SKUs. It's just not going to happen.

Apple has multiple OS editions at differnet price points too. You just don't notice because they bake it into the price of their hardware. Since their business operates in an entirely different way than Microsoft, you cannot compare the two.

Also, Apple is mainly interested in converting PC buyers into Mac buyers. Thus, success / growth for them means taking someone who would have bought a PC and getting them to buy a Mac. For Microsoft, everybody already buys PCs. Getting new people to buy PCs is very difficult since there are only so many people in the world (and only so many in a position to buy a computer).

So it's hard for Microsoft to grow by getting new users. So instead, Microsoft's best option for growth is to get existing users to pay more. That can mean buying more computers, buying new kinds of devices (like an Xbox, a Media Center, a Tablet, or a Windows Home Server). But it can also mean buying more expensive versions of Windows. In order to do that, those higher-priced editions need to offer compelling enough feature sets or other advantages that make them worth more money to a significant number of people.

Really, asking for one version of Windows is like asking Sony to stop making different PS3s with different hard drive sizes. Well yeah, if you only want the 40GB one then you don't care about the other options. But some people want the option to pay more for an 80GB or 120GB version. Just because you don't want to doesn't mean they shouldn't offer the option. Now, some of you will say that Microsoft should just sell Ultimate at the cheapest price. That's just like saying that Sony should get rid of the 40GB and 80GB PS3s and sell a 120GB model at the price of the 40GB. It won't happen because it's a losing proposition for them, and asking for it just makes you sound ridiculous.

Sounds fair in theory but the impact is really unpleasant options for the consumer. An OS should be a platform for building from. It would be far more consumer friendly for MS to make adding the different features of their OS versions by buying them afterwards. None of this "I want feature x but have os version x so I need to buy os version y and then either upgrade the OS or reinstall the OS".

All of the following could be purchaseable otions:

Domain support

Disk Encryption

Virtual PC host

Media Center

Tablet support

Dreamscene

Windows Games

Photo gallery

Movie maker

Businesses would not be loaded with unwanted options and consumers could easily add the business features they wanted and MS gets a new market to make money from. Everyone's a winner.

Maybe MS should have thought through the difficulties they were generating with the multiple sku's before they added so many.

Basic shouldn't exist, home premium and business are like xp home and pro, and ultimate just includes options from those 2 (like pro was the real deal). but yeah, scrap ultimate too. I would ship just a server and a client version

You are incorrect in your statement on Home Basic and Home Premium.

Home Basic is equal to XP Home.

Home Premium is equal to XP MCE

Business is equal to XP Pro

The only new SKU to Vista is Ultimate.

My suggestion to the whole Windows version debacle is for them to make 2 main versions, and then a server product:

1.) Windows Business - Contains everything except for Media Center, Games, Movie Maker, DVD Maker, and other multimedia packages. This is suitable for both home and business users, and is the less expensive version.

2.) Windows Complete - The complete version of Windows. This is for both home and business users.

3.) Windows Server - Server product.

And finally, they should lower the price. My "Windows Complete" suggestion should not sell for more than $200 for a full retail version.

I know Apple has it's Server product and Desktop product.

The Desktop product is just one version, there is no multiple SKU's in Retail.

Brandon. I hate to sound like a broken record. But Apple and Linux distributions do this. You buy one version. It's the complete version. You then choose what to not install in custom installation settings. Comparing Hardware to Software is not really comparing apples with apples.

No, they do NOT have one edition.

They have the Macbook and they have the Macbook Pro. Those are different price points. Different SKUs, if you will. One has more features and costs more than the other. It's the exact same thing. Why would Apple bother to have "Macbook with OS X Home Edition" and "Macbook Pro with OS X Business Edition" when they might as well just call them the Macbook and Macbook Pro?

If they sold their OS to OEMs, then it would be a fair comparison.

Linux obviously isn't a fair comparison, it's free. You can't have different price points if they're all free. Make no mistake, the whole point of different SKUs is different price points.

My suggestion to the whole Windows version debacle is for them to make 2 main versions, and then a server product:

1.) Windows Business - Contains everything except for Media Center, Games, Movie Maker, DVD Maker, and other multimedia packages. This is suitable for both home and business users, and is the less expensive version.

2.) Windows Complete - The complete version of Windows. This is for both home and business users.

3.) Windows Server - Server product.

And finally, they should lower the price. My "Windows Complete" suggestion should not sell for more than $200 for a full retail version.

Vista Business costs more than Home Premium, Or i would have bought it. Never had a need for Media Center.

I have to agree with both approaches, Which is exactly what Steve is trying to say - There is no clear-cut solution. You have to compromise.

Personally, I'd love it if Microsoft put a "Custom Install" option, clearly noting that it is NOT supported. The people who would bother to use are most likely advanced users, Who wouldn't need Microsoft support either way.

Sounds fair in theory but the impact is really unpleasant options for the consumer. An OS should be a platform for building from. It would be far more consumer friendly for MS to make adding the different features of their OS versions by buying them afterwards. None of this "I want feature x but have os version x so I need to buy os version y and then either upgrade the OS or reinstall the OS".

All of the following could be purchaseable otions:

Domain support

Disk Encryption

Virtual PC host

Media Center

Tablet support

Dreamscene

Windows Games

Photo gallery

Movie maker

Businesses would not be loaded with unwanted options and consumers could easily add the business features they wanted and MS gets a new market to make money from. Everyone's a winner.

Maybe MS should have thought through the difficulties they were generating with the multiple sku's before they added so many.

That's more or less how it works today, right? Yeah there's no a la carte option, but you can buy Home Basic and then use the Windows Anytime Upgrade feature to turn it into Business or Home Premium if you want those features.

The only major difference between Home Basic and Home Premium is Media Center support. Other than that it's all little things like Flip3D and such).

Brandon, may I make a quickie request, you can ignore it....but...

FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY AND RIGHT IN THE WORLD! lol..

Anyways, how about UI unification, for instance, in the classic non-glass areas of Vista, like in those apps that use XP style menus and such, it looks horrible, outstretched and out of place..

post-118616-1220048615_thumb.jpg

No, they do NOT have one edition.

They have the Macbook and they have the Macbook Pro. Those are different price points. Different SKUs, if you will. One has more features and costs more than the other. It's the exact same thing. Why would Apple bother to have "Macbook with OS X Home Edition" and "Macbook Pro with OS X Business Edition" when they might as well just call them the Macbook and Macbook Pro?

If they sold their OS to OEMs, then it would be a fair comparison.

Linux obviously isn't a fair comparison, it's free. You can't have different price points if they're all free. Make no mistake, the whole point of different SKUs is different price points.

That's a silly comparison, because they sell 10.5 as a single product as well and not just bundled with the hardware. Apple did sell hardware before they released 10.5 and consumers are welcome to upgrade if they want--everybody will pay a flat price for a single version that has all the features.

A Macbook Pro does not have more software features than a Macbook. Neither does a Mac Pro. Nor an iMac. The difference in prices are merely between the hardware--not software.

Brandon, may I make a quickie request, you can ignore it....but...

FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY AND RIGHT IN THE WORLD! lol..

Anyways, how about UI unification, for instance, in the classic non-glass areas of Vista, like in those apps that use XP style menus and such, it looks horrible, outstretched and out of place..

http://www.aerotaskforce.com/

That's a silly comparison, because they sell 10.5 as a single product as well and not just bundled with the hardware. Apple did sell hardware before they released 10.5 and consumers are welcome to upgrade if they want--everybody will pay a flat price for a single version that has all the features.

A Macbook Pro does not have more software features than a Macbook. Neither does a Mac Pro. Nor an iMac. The difference in prices are merely between the hardware--not software.

Thanks @ giga. (Y)

Perhaps Brandon needs to go to a Mac store and see for himself.

Microsoft has got to realize that whatever their (flawed, IMO) justifications, most customers don't want to choose from the number of Windows versions that are currently available. IMO For Home customers their should be - Windows Home and for Enthusiasts - Windows Premium. Get rid of Ultimate, that was a scam.

Then for Business have a Windows Business and Windows Server. That's it! That has got to be easier for everyone.

what would be a good solution is make 3 versions. a business version that has stuff a business needs and a business can purchase a few extras if needed and a home version for home users that has all a home user needs and have 1 that has the best of both worlds but the 3rd one could have backwards compatability at least partialy removed and cost slighty more than the home version but less than the business version but if you needed backwards compatability turned on fully ypu could have an option to do that.

The reason Windows hasn't grasped on to this subject can be found in linux. Linux has the repos to install WHAT a user wants through..well YAST since I like Opensuse. it doesn't shove all that crap down our throats at install.

this is my thought on windows 7

win7wi5.jpg

Microsoft has got to realize that whatever their (flawed, IMO) justifications

But the thing is that these things have to be REALLY well justified. If you have some profound analysis that countered the SKU design plans and led to some particular revelation - get a job in this space. Given all the available data out there, the Vista plan was designed. And any Windows 7 design would have to account for all the relevant factors as well, with the benefit of hindsight upon the Vista plan. Any plans have to be analyzed and approved given all available data. If somebody decides to just ignore important feedback without great justification, they're probably not going to succeed or keep their job.

I think the consistent point you raise is that the Vista SKU story could be cleaned up. I don't believe the Windows 7 SKU story if any is public at this time, and the article in question certainly doesn't key off of that. Assume that the right people here are not idiots, understand your criticism, and more importantly understand that any SKU variation comes at a non-trivial cost to the company.

Taken at least the last two points for granted (haters can assume the MS world is made up of monkeys on keyboards if they need to) combined with the fact that a new robust componentization system was first generally introduced in Vista, I would assume that Windows 7 would probably build off of that. Catering to the vLite "My Personal Win SKU" crowd requires significant cost (testing 10,000 variations well, oddly enough, takes around 10,000 tests). The "There Should Only Be 'N' SKUs" crowd should avoid a street rumble with the vLite crowd and realize that there has to be some pretty profound justification for any given SKU. If you personally don't feel that there should be 'N' SKUs, you should realize that that's your personal opinion without all the facts on hand. I can probably hook you up with the right people if you're really interested in a job in SKU design. If we're just armchair quarterbacking here, that's cool, but it's strange in a Windows 7 thread given that I'm not aware that the Windows 7 SKU plan is being publicly discussed at this point. :)

All these opinions prooffered so far are valuable and all are concerns or considerations that the right people are aware of. <3

@ zachdms. Do you work for Microsoft? (zachd_at_online.microsoft.com) ?

I understand what your saying zachdms, you say that it costs to change SKU's (perhaps costs a lot).

So why did Microsoft change the sensible Windows XP SKU's to the schizophrenic confused mess that is Vista SKU'?

There must have been reason, perhaps it was made by the marketing team? Either way. It's No. 1 Confusion Central.

I don't hate Microsoft or Vista. I like Vista, now, that it's had it's SP1, drivers are solid and compatibility has been improved.

Microsoft however should take a good look at itself. Windows is becoming an unwieldy behemoth.

Componization needs to be accelerated.

Setup needs to be granular for those who want the option and performance needs to take priority.

Multithreading / SMP need to take priority at Kernel level and Application level. By the time Windows 7 ships computers are

likely to ship standard with a Quad Core CPU and 4 to 8GB RAM.

Also, I don't accept the argument 'too many SKU's too much testing'. Apple can do it. Yeah? So can Microsoft.

If you're offering me a job at Microsoft. Seriously. Let's talk. I can talk the talk and walk the walk.

Edited by splicer707
Also, I don't accept the argument 'too many SKU's too much testing'. Apple can do it. Yeah? So can Microsoft.

You mean too much customizing. Well, Apple doesn't have to release quite as many patches as MS does.

And REALLY is it too hard to figure out what Vista version you want?

Am I using it mostly at home? Home Premium

Am I using it mostly at work? Business

Am I a home-business? Ultimate

Made the wrong choice? Windows Anytime Upgrade

This is perhaps the OEM's fault, Microsoft's fault, and the user's. For a long time, the pre-installed Windows has usually been the 'right' one for the user. Now it's occasionally the wrong one because the OEM shoves Vista Basic on it. I

Simple. 2 versions.

1) Professional

2) Home

XP had it right as far as i am concerned. No confusion. If you are a professional or business buy Professional. If you are a home user, buy Home. Done and dusted.

Microsoft should NOT be complicating this part. Its essential for them to nail it on the head. I think XP nailed it. No confusion.

That's a silly comparison, because they sell 10.5 as a single product as well and not just bundled with the hardware. Apple did sell hardware before they released 10.5 and consumers are welcome to upgrade if they want--everybody will pay a flat price for a single version that has all the features.

It's not silly. As I said, the only people who can buy the boxed version of 10.5 are people who already gave Apple a huge amount of money for at least one machine. For Apple, upgrade purchases are just gravy. Their business model doesn't involve selling those boxed software products, the revenue from it is tiny in comparison to their hardware sales.

A Macbook Pro does not have more software features than a Macbook. Neither does a Mac Pro. Nor an iMac. The difference in prices are merely between the hardware--not software.

No, the difference covers the entire package. They don't sell laptops with Mac OS Home Edition and Mac OS Business Edition, they sell the Macbook Home Edition and the Macbook Business Edition. There is no point in having different software SKUs since they don't sell software. They can't get an OEM to pay more for Mac OS Business Edition since they are the only OEM.

Thanks @ giga. (Y)

Perhaps Brandon needs to go to a Mac store and see for himself.

Until about a week ago my laptop was a Macbook (and I still have it, though probably not for much longer). So no, I don't need to visit an Apple store to see anything.

Until about a week ago my laptop was a Macbook (and I still have it, though probably not for much longer). So no, I don't need to visit an Apple store to see anything.

If you're giving it away. I'll send you my postal address. ;)

It's not silly. As I said, the only people who can buy the boxed version of 10.5 are people who already gave Apple a huge amount of money for at least one machine. For Apple, upgrade purchases are just gravy. Their business model doesn't involve selling those boxed software products, the revenue from it is tiny in comparison to their hardware sales.

No, the difference covers the entire package. They don't sell laptops with Mac OS Home Edition and Mac OS Business Edition, they sell the Macbook Home Edition and the Macbook Business Edition. There is no point in having different software SKUs since they don't sell software. They can't get an OEM to pay more for Mac OS Business Edition since they are the only OEM.

There's bothing like a Macbook Home and Business edition, there's no difference software wise between the two and the both are perfectly well suited to work at home or in a business so I can't see how your analogy works with this.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm fine with a little reasonable promotion of Edge, but the degree which they do it right now I consider extremely unreasonable. 
    • Microsoft AI boss no longer believes that AI will replace human workers by David Uzondu Mustafa Suleyman, the head of Microsoft AI, recently took back his statements concerning white-collar jobs that he gave to the Financial Times in an interview made back in February, where he claimed that AI would replace office workers within 12 to 18 months. On Monday's episode of The Verge's Decoder, Suleyman recast the technology as more like a helpmate than a tool designed to take over your job. He explained that smaller office duties will "increasingly become digitized, automated" as people generate more digital materials. During the discussion, Suleyman emphasized a "very important distinction" between "tasks" and "jobs" to clarify his previous claims. He argued that his earlier comments only referred to individual actions that people perform at their desks. Suleyman used to work for DeepMind, the research lab he co-founded in 2010 alongside Demis Hassabis and Shane Legg, before he left in 2022 to establish Inflection AI and build an empathetic digital assistant. Microsoft hired him in March 2024 to lead its newly formed "Microsoft AI" division, placing him in charge of consumer products like Copilot, Bing, and Edge. His February comments also detailed plans for Microsoft to achieve self-sufficiency with a $140 billion infrastructure budget to train frontier models, predicting that creating a customized AI will soon feel like creating a podcast or a new blog: The 41-year-old is not the only AI executive who's softened his "AI will replace you" stance. OpenAI's CEO, Sam Altman, last month used X to push back against employment panic by arguing that his startup builds tools to assist humans rather than build replacements. He had previously garnered backlash by suggesting that many modern office roles that AI might replace did not qualify as "real work" in the first place, at least when you compare desk jobs to physical, historical labor like farming.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader DC 2026.001.21662 by Razvan Serea Adobe Acrobat Reader DC software is the free, trusted standard for viewing, printing, signing, and annotating PDFs. Its the only PDF viewer that can open and interact with all types of PDF content – including forms and multimedia. It’s connected to Adobe Document Cloud – so you can work with PDFs on computers and mobile devices. Adobe Document Cloud is a revolutionary, modern and efficient way to get work done with documents in the office, at home or on-the-go. At the heart of Document Cloud is the all-new Adobe Acrobat DC, which will take e-signatures mainstream by delivering free e-signing with every individual subscription. Document Cloud includes a set of integrated services that use a consistent online profile and personal document hub. With Adobe Document Cloud, people will be able to create, review, approve, sign and track documents whether on a desktop or mobile device. Businesses will be able to take advantage of Document Cloud for enterprise which provides enterprise-class document services that integrate into systems of record such as CRM, HCM, CLM, and CMS, adding speed, efficiency and transparency to getting business done with documents. Adobe Acrobat Reader DC new feature highlights: Work with PDFs from anywhere with the new, free Acrobat DC mobile app for Android or iOS. Select functionality is also available on Windows Phone. Use the new Fill & Sign tool in your desktop software to complete PDF forms fast with smart autofill. Download the free Adobe Fill & Sign mobile app to add the same option to your iPad or Android tablet device. Save money on ink and toner when printing from your Windows PC. Store and access files in Adobe Document Cloud with 5GB of free storage. Get instant access to recent files across desktop, web, and mobile devices with Mobile Link. Sync your Fill & Sign autofill collection across desktop, web, and iPad devices. Adobe PDF Pack premium features includes: Convert documents and images to PDF files. Use your mobile device camera to take a picture of a paper document or form and convert it to PDF. Turn PDFs into editable Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, or RTF files. Combine multiple files into a single PDF (web only). Get signatures from others with a complete e-signature service. Send, track, and confirm delivery of documents electronically instead of using fax or overnight services (tracking not available on mobile). Store and access files online with 20GB of storage. Download: Adobe Acrobat Reader DC 64-bit | 719.0 MB (Freeware) Link: Adobe Acrobat Reader DC Home Page | Release Notes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Meta will now use data from outside businesses to personalize AI responses by David Uzondu In an update that's rolling out globally (except in a handful of countries), Meta will use your data from outside businesses to personalize your AI responses and your primary feeds. Meta already utilizes your shopping activity to target ads, but the company now plans to expand this tracking to personalize other "parts of your experience" like feed algorithms and AI assistant chats. The company is replacing the two settings ("Your activity off Meta technologies" and "Activity from other businesses") that currently let you disconnect off-platform activity with a single, renamed setting called Activity from other businesses. If you don't want Meta to manipulate your feed and AI responses using your outside history, you can just turn the Activity from other businesses setting off in your account settings. This toggle resides within your Accounts Center, applying your choice to every connected profile. Turning this off will not stop companies from sending your data to Meta. The company will still collect your web interactions, but it only uses them to train products, while still accessing external accounts you connect. When The Verge spoke to Meta spokesperson Emil Vazquez, the representative said that this update will exclude several locations at launch, including the European region, the UK, Brazil, Thailand, South Africa, Turkey, South Korea, Ecuador, Nigeria, and Kenya. The new update comes at a time when the social media giant is recovering from a major PR disaster involving generative AI. Last week, there was a huge security issue on Instagram where attackers figured out a way to trick Meta AI into handing over account ownership (even if the victim had 2FA enabled). Some of the affected accounts include the dormant Obama White House profile, cosmetics brand Sephora, the Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force, and security researcher Jane Manchun Wong. Internally, the company also had to scale back plans on its Model Capability Initiative (MCI), an employee-monitoring program designed to train corporate AI models by recording worker keystrokes and screen activity, after employees raised privacy concerns and complained about severe battery life drain.
    • JetBrains is working to cut false positives in RustRover 2026.2 by David Uzondu Recently, JetBrains released the fifth EAP build of its dedicated IDE, RustRover 2026.2, bringing improvements like a Run gutter icon for criterion_main! macro benchmarking and a feature that alerts you when there are unused traits in your current scope. Now, the company is out with a blog post addressing one of the "most common" complaints from users: false positives. In RustRover, a false positive occurs when the editor incorrectly highlights something as an error even though the project compiles and runs successfully. This mismatch flags a gap between the IDE's internal intelligence and the actual compiler. When the editor flashes red warnings over perfectly valid code, developers lose trust in the tool, which stalls momentum. Traditionally, RustRover runs cargo check to detect compiler errors and warnings, but it also relies on its own code analysis engine to power real-time features. To provide quick feedback, this engine parses your source code into a syntax tree while inferring types and resolving names as you type. Because this engine must work on broken, half-written code and react instantly, its logic sometimes diverges from the compiler's, producing false positives that do not exist in the compiler's eyes. JetBrains said that it has a "dedicated task force" focused specifically on identifying and fixing false positives by analyzing user reports and examining large-scale open-source projects. To speed up this process, the team built an internal system modeled after Crater, the famous Rust project that compiles and runs tests for every single crate published on crates.io. This automated pipeline compares the diagnostics from RustRover's analysis with actual compiler output to catch discrepancies before they reach users, ensuring smoother workflows. RustRover, for those who're unaware, is a dedicated IDE designed specifically for Rust developers. It's been around for a couple of years now, providing features like built-in debugging via LLDB, seamless cargo integration, advanced macro expansion, and HTML support. JetBrains distributes the app under two licensing models: a paid commercial subscription and a free option for non-commercial use.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Edouard
      134
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!