Recommended Posts

I have randomly supported Vista and being an IT administrator have shuned the idea of introducing Vista to our users due to problems it could face. I took the plunge a few days ago and decided to install the 32 bit version on a latitude laptop 2.5 6M Cache with 4Gigs of Ram. I am quite sure the specs are what give me the experience I have now. I am actually enjoying myself with the OS since continuously shouting negativities. Not to say that my users would have the same experience that I do, but I find that some of the applications we use actually work smoother.

This cold also be because Vista has been out for quite a while and I am running on SP1 which may have fixed many issues. :p

So I take back any of the negative comments I may have made against Vista in the past. Within the next few weeks I am going to try out x64 on an Eseries...

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/662778-4-hating-on-vista/
Share on other sites

Ive been using vista since it came out and been using the x64 version for a few months after getting my new system up and running, the only issues i have are that some of my really old software runs either slowly or not at all, but its a none issue for most as they no longer use the old software i do.

Only problem i have with vista (32 bit and 64 bit (current)) is the random atikmdag.sys BSOD's when watching full screen movies.

But the question is, who is to blame?

people say they don't get them in XP, but i cba to try it out.

Overall Vista have only surprised me in a positive way tho.

Only problem i have with vista (32 bit and 64 bit (current)) is the random atikmdag.sys BSOD's when watching full screen movies.

But the question is, who is to blame?

people say they don't get them in XP, but i cba to try it out.

Overall Vista have only surprised me in a positive way tho.

The reason I stopped using Vista is that my USB devices just stop working on my laptop, just randomly out of nowhere. I've tried so many OS's on this laptop including XP, OS/2, various Linux distro's and never experience anything wrong with USB. So I have to blame Vista for this. It's also "Vista ready" so there should be no reason why this is happening, but eh.

Everyone sooner or later will use it and migrate to it.

Nope, not true. Was in the early beta for Vista and for SP1 so have used it extensively and don't like. Sticking with XP SP3 and will probably just wait on Win7 (yes I know it's based on the vista kernal but there will be changes).

I have randomly supported Vista and being an IT administrator have shuned the idea of introducing Vista to our users due to problems it could face. I took the plunge a few days ago and decided to install the 32 bit version on a latitude laptop 2.5 6M Cache with 4Gigs of Ram. I am quite sure the specs are what give me the experience I have now. I am actually enjoying myself with the OS since continuously shouting negativities. Not to say that my users would have the same experience that I do, but I find that some of the applications we use actually work smoother.

This cold also be because Vista has been out for quite a while and I am running on SP1 which may have fixed many issues. :p

So I take back any of the negative comments I may have made against Vista in the past. Within the next few weeks I am going to try out x64 on an Eseries...

You think Vista is smooth and fast? Try Server 2008...Its awesome. Better than Vista even though some say its the same core. I find the GUI in Server responds faster than in Vista. Maybe its just me seeing things, but try it for yourself and tell us what U think. You can get a trial version from Microsoft.

You think Vista is smooth and fast? Try Server 2008...Its awesome. Better than Vista even though some say its the same core. I find the GUI in Server responds faster than in Vista. Maybe its just me seeing things, but try it for yourself and tell us what U think. You can get a trial version from Microsoft.

I actually have.. and used it before Vista. It could be what made me plunge. I would say that IIS scared me a bit! =)

I actually have.. and used it before Vista. It could be what made me plunge. I would say that IIS scared me a bit! =)

Well some people here claim Vista and Server are the same. I say no. Vista - Build 6000. Server 2008- Build 6001. Server has less services running than Vista. It responds much quicker, connects to the internet in a flash. When you tell it to close an application after the application crashes, it closes it. Vista thinks about it. It boots faster too. Server 2008 is not Vista. There is something internally different in it. It's designed better than Vista (internally). There are just so many things better on Server 2008 is not funny. I hate Vista. I tried it, twiked it to the max and I still found it slow and annoying. I am quite happy with Server 2008. It simply works.

Well some people here claim Vista and Server are the same. I say no. Vista - Build 6000. Server 2008- Build 6001. Server has less services running than Vista. It responds much quicker, connects to the internet in a flash. When you tell it to close an application after the application crashes, it closes it. Vista thinks about it. It boots faster too. Server 2008 is not Vista. There is something internally different in it. It's designed better than Vista (internally). There are just so many things better on Server 2008 is not funny. I hate Vista. I tried it, twiked it to the max and I still found it slow and annoying. I am quite happy with Server 2008. It simply works.

Vista RTM was build 6000, Windows Vista SP1 is build 6001, the same as Windows Server 2008.

Well some people here claim Vista and Server are the same. I say no. Vista - Build 6000. Server 2008- Build 6001. Server has less services running than Vista. It responds much quicker, connects to the internet in a flash. When you tell it to close an application after the application crashes, it closes it. Vista thinks about it. It boots faster too. Server 2008 is not Vista. There is something internally different in it. It's designed better than Vista (internally). There are just so many things better on Server 2008 is not funny. I hate Vista. I tried it, twiked it to the max and I still found it slow and annoying. I am quite happy with Server 2008. It simply works.

Windows Vista SP1 also happens to be build 6001.

Can list the things in Server 08 that are designed better than Vista? Please be specific as possible. What else is "better on Server 2008"? Again, please list specific items.

P.S. Your bold key is broken.

IMO people who work in the computer industry who still recommend XP to their customers have no business being there. Vista is now a fine operating system to use, and soon enough the XP fanboys will migrate to it.

I like you're spirited if misguided approach to Vista. I've been in the computer industry for over 18 years, have a network of over 40,000 computers to attend to and there is no way currently that we will be upgrading to Vista.

Just because I don't like Vista does not mean that I shouldn't be in the computer industry. Try telling that to all the Linux/Unix people out there.

Not every "XP fanboy" as you call them will migrate to Vista. A lot will probably just wait on Win7.

I agree that Vista isn't as bad as some people make it out to be, but it is still bad enough that I personally won't upgrade to it and the network that I help run won't be upgrading either.

Vista RTM was build 6000, Windows Vista SP1 is build 6001, the same as Windows Server 2008.

Server 2008 is still different. There is something about it that works better. MS hurried Vista out the door. They took their time with Server.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
    • VidCoder 12.20 by Razvan Serea  VidCoder is a DVD/Blu-ray ripping and video transcoding application for Windows. It uses HandBrake as its encoding engine. Calling directly into the HandBrake library gives it a more rich UI than the official HandBrake Windows GUI. VidCoder can rip DVDs but does not defeat the CSS encryption found in most commercial DVDs. You’ll need the NET 8 Desktop Runtime. If you don’t have it, VidCoder will prompt you to download and install it. The Portable version is self-contained and does not require any .NET Runtime to be installed. You do not need to install HandBrake for VidCoder to work. Feature list: Multi-threaded MP4, MKV containers Completely integrated encoding pipeline: everything is in one process and no huge intermediate temporary files H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, MPEG-2, VP8, Theora video Hardware-accelerated encoding with AMD VCE, Nvidia NVENC and Intel QuickSync AAC, MP3, Vorbis, AC3, FLAC audio encoding and AAC/AC3/MP3/DTS/DTS-HD passthrough Target bitrate, size or quality for video 2-pass encoding Decomb, detelecine, deinterlace, rotate, reflect, chroma smooth, colorspace filters Powerful batch encoding with simultaneous encodes Customizable Pickers to automatically pick audio and subtitle tracks, destination, titles and more Instant source previews Creates small encoded preview clips Pause, resume encoding VidCoder 12.20 changes: Updated HandBrake core to 1.11.2. Download: VidCoder 12.20 | 47.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable VidCoder 12.19 | 89.3 MB Link: VidCoder Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      592
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!