Recommended Posts

Well some people here claim Vista and Server are the same. I say no. Vista - Build 6000. Server 2008- Build 6001. Server has less services running than Vista. It responds much quicker, connects to the internet in a flash. When you tell it to close an application after the application crashes, it closes it. Vista thinks about it. It boots faster too. Server 2008 is not Vista. There is something internally different in it. It's designed better than Vista (internally). There are just so many things better on Server 2008 is not funny. I hate Vista. I tried it, twiked it to the max and I still found it slow and annoying. I am quite happy with Server 2008. It simply works.

Server 2008 is at the same level as Vista SP1, hence why Server 2008 has SP1 in the name ;)

Vista SP1 - Build 6001 - sorry, what were you saying about different?

edit - Too slow :happy:

I am not the only one that has noticed Server 2008 is faster than Vista. Google is your best friend. Read on:

http://exo-blog.blogspot.com/2008/03/windo...done-right.html

http://www.itwriting.com/blog/596-vista-sp...omparisons.html

http://wastingtimewithmikeandari.wordpress...e-ram-of-vista/

Server 2008 is still different. There is something about it that works better. MS hurried Vista out the door. They took their time with Server.

Less enabled services by default. That's it. Anything else you're thinking is purely a placebo effect.

I am not the only one that has noticed Server 2008 is faster than Vista. Google is your best friend. Read on:

[

Server is faster than Vista precisely because it is a server and has most of the bells and whistles that Vista comes with turned off. There is no need to have these on a server.

Server 2008 and Vista do however share the exact same kernal codebase.

Well, having run Server 2008 for a few weeks after its release and customizing it to be just as useful as Vista (SP1) for daily usage, I have to say there is NO difference.. Links from a few blogs really won't prove that cuz bloggers say what they want

EDIT: In fact driver installation has been slower on Server 2008

Well, having run Server 2008 for a few weeks after its release and customizing it to be just as useful as Vista (SP1) for daily usage, I have to say there is NO difference.. Links from a few blogs really won't prove that cuz bloggers say what they want

EDIT: In fact driver installation has been slower on Server 2008

OK I tell you what, why don't you conduct your own benchmark tests and post the results here so we can see? That way we can see if the "bloggers" are wrong. One of the "bloggers" that has many times stated that Server 2008 is better and faster than Vista happens to be a Microsoft employee. I wish I was at home right now to get the link from my Favs and post his Blog site link so you can read what he says about it, but I will be more than glad to see your own test results on the two OSs.

^^I have read that Microsoft employee's entry. I don't think he works in the Windows group. Microsoft is a vast company.

My personal experience is that the perf is equivalent on Windows 2008 and Vista SP1 when configured with the same features.

I disabled Windows Search since I don't need it anymore on my main system.

OK I tell you what, why don't you conduct your own benchmark tests and post the results here so we can see? That way we can see if the "bloggers" are wrong. One of the "bloggers" that has many times stated that Server 2008 is better and faster than Vista happens to be a Microsoft employee. I wish I was at home right now to get the link from my Favs and post his Blog site link so you can read what he says about it, but I will be more than glad to see your own test results on the two OSs.

I have both 64-bit and the 32-bit versions of Standard (OEM). I've ran both, and conducted my own testing, on the same exact system. This is the same crap as the '2003-as-a-workstation' BS that was fluttering about for years. By the time you bring 2008 up to the level of usability that Vista has out of the box, and jump through all those hoops...if you still feel you've spent your money well just to run it as a desktop...well, good on you. I can't related, but good on you. Personally, I'll stick with Vista Home Premium for most of my at-home usage.

OK I tell you what, why don't you conduct your own benchmark tests and post the results here so we can see? That way we can see if the "bloggers" are wrong. One of the "bloggers" that has many times stated that Server 2008 is better and faster than Vista happens to be a Microsoft employee. I wish I was at home right now to get the link from my Favs and post his Blog site link so you can read what he says about it, but I will be more than glad to see your own test results on the two OSs.

You are completely missing the point here. Server and Vista are both built on the same code. Server is "faster" than Vista because a lot of the components and services that Vista have turned on by default are either not installed or turned off in Server.

If you turned on/installed these on Server then compared on like machines then you would find that server should actually run a little slower than Vista as Server would then have more services than Vista does.

I know which post you're referring to but that does not turn Server into Vista as not all the services/components are installed, just the most widely used ones. If Server wasn't the same code base as Vista then you couldn't do this at all.

Nope, not true. Was in the early beta for Vista and for SP1 so have used it extensively and don't like. Sticking with XP SP3 and will probably just wait on Win7 (yes I know it's based on the vista kernal but there will be changes).

Sooner or Later. People change along side w/ their usage and as a result their opinions change with it. They'll use for whatever they see benefit with even if it is small.

That my friend is how the game is played, it's the nature of any product out on the market.

Edited by The Intruder

Yeah i dont know why everyone is So "Against" Vista

This afternoon it proved (for me) again that it was better... i was running a game on XP.. and it got stuck cause i shut down MDM in my services.. (My pc tried to initialize it.. and get like 20 errors trying to do so.. and after it just got stuck)

On vista i never get this Same game..

IMO people who work in the computer industry who still recommend XP to their customers have no business being there. Vista is now a fine operating system to use, and soon enough the XP fanboys will migrate to it.

The corporate boys would still be happily running their people on Windows 2000 Professional if Microsoft had continued full support of that product.

The corporate boys would still be happily running their people on Windows 2000 Professional if Microsoft had continued full support of that product.

I would still be running Windows 2000 if MS was still supporting it. That was probably MS most stable and best OS. Too bad its history now.

Someone just needs to do some digging and find out what is and what isn't running on Server so that we can do the same to Vista and see how it behaves. I think Vista has way too much crap running on the background and that affects some of its performance. Vista is not a bad OS but it could be faster and I know it can be made faster by turning off a lot of useless crap. No need to have 50+ services running. Server 2008 has 35 and XP 18 and they run perfectly fine.

I would still be running Windows 2000 if MS was still supporting it. That was probably MS most stable and best OS. Too bad its history now.

Someone just needs to do some digging and find out what is and what isn't running on Server so that we can do the same to Vista and see how it behaves. I think Vista has way too much crap running on the background and that affects some of its performance. Vista is not a bad OS but it could be faster and I know it can be made faster by turning off a lot of useless crap. No need to have 50+ services running. Server 2008 has 35 and XP 18 and they run perfectly fine.

I have 37 services running on Vista Business.

I would have thought so, but it doesn't change the fact that he needs XP for that specific software version.

Well I don't know if its adobe's fault, but I have other reasons, that I can't play some games in the same quality as in xp. Even when I use Windows Classic as theme for some reason. I hate Apple, I hate Microsoft. I'm on nobody's side. Well maybe linux a bit.

It's good to hear people actually giving objective views of Vista. Soon, others will too.

Objective views on a tech site? Nooo way :rolleyes:

The false perspective out there is pretty damn strong, and everyone who hates it has probably not tried it or just hates MS (aka Apple/Linux fanboys/girls)

Yes, but Vista Premium has more services running. Vista business doesn't have certain things that Premium version has.

I run Vista Ultimate. Fresh install and messenger running in the background. 40 services. Still not as low as xp but not the +50 you say.

Only problem i have with vista (32 bit and 64 bit (current)) is the random atikmdag.sys BSOD's when watching full screen movies.

But the question is, who is to blame?

people say they don't get them in XP, but i cba to try it out.

Overall Vista have only surprised me in a positive way tho.

Downgrade or upgrade your video drivers.

ATI's 8.8 drivers caused this error for me, so I downgraded back to the 8.7, which doesn't.

Yes, but Vista Premium has more services running. Vista business doesn't have certain things that Premium version has.

Yes I know, I beta tested Vista Ultimate(Premium), the only real differences are the media center and Dreamscene. It would have more services.

Vista Home Premium and Ultimate have useless stuff that drag it down. For example:

Windows Media Center - Who the hell uses this?

Windows DVD Maker - Excellent idea...but...you can't customize the DVD menu with your own stuff, can't add more templates and you all know that MS is not going to bother making any new templates for it either. Ashampoo Burn Studio 6.6 Free Edition has better templates and features than this crap.

Windows Defender - A joke. Lots of freeware anti-spyware stuff out there that do a better job than this.

Windows Paint - Totally useless

Windows Word Processor - Another useless application

Should I go on?

Vista Home Premium and Ultimate have useless stuff that drag it down. For example:

Windows Media Center - Who the hell uses this?

Windows DVD Maker - Excellent idea...but...you can't customize the DVD menu with your own stuff, can't add more templates and you all know that MS is not going to bother making any new templates for it either. Ashampoo Burn Studio 6.6 Free Edition has better templates and features than this crap.

Windows Defender - A joke. Lots of freeware anti-spyware stuff out there that do a better job than this.

Windows Paint - Totally useless

Windows Word Processor - Another useless application

Should I go on?

Please don't.. enough BS posting.

Vista Home Premium and Ultimate have useless stuff that drag it down. For example:

Windows Media Center - Who the hell uses this?

Windows DVD Maker - Excellent idea...but...you can't customize the DVD menu with your own stuff, can't add more templates and you all know that MS is not going to bother making any new templates for it either. Ashampoo Burn Studio 6.6 Free Edition has better templates and features than this crap.

Windows Defender - A joke. Lots of freeware anti-spyware stuff out there that do a better job than this.

Windows Paint - Totally useless

Windows Word Processor - Another useless application

Should I go on?

1) i do, to watch tv, as do countless other people, it actually is a great pvr

2) used it one or two times to make a dvd without having to think too much. Doesn't use any resources when you don't use it

3) not using a lot of resources, never had spyware or viruses, never tried something else

4) uses no resources (except a few mb of hard disk space)

5) same as 4 and I assume some people use it

In fact, I assume a lot of people use dvd maker too, for someone who doesn't know the first thing about making dvd's it's a godsent. You on the other hand assume way to much, it's not because you don't like somethig other people don't use it.

You have been throwing all kind of FUD around in this topic, regarding server 2008 and vista and actually have proved just one thing: <snipped>

Edited by Fred Derf
Vista Home Premium and Ultimate have useless stuff that drag it down. For example:

Windows Media Center - Who the hell uses this?

I use it actually. I just recently built a machine just to use Media Center as my TV. It's not to have a version of windows where you don't have to install another program as a Media Center or have two disks for XP MCE.

Windows Defender - A joke. Lots of freeware anti-spyware stuff out there that do a better job than this.

Agreed 100% here

Windows Word Processor - Another useless application

And here as well

But Vista isn't all that bad really. I was hesitant to try it until I bought a laptop with Vista pre-loaded. I don't mind it.

Where it gets its bad name is from.. Microshaft tried to push an unfinished product out the door while other companies were dragging their feet to make their hardware/software compatible while waiting for MS to make the OS better.

Stupid.. stupid stupid... :no:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!