[DDR2] 4x1GB vs 2x2GB?


Recommended Posts

Well after reading a lot of sites i am starting to regret my choice. I heard there is a significant difference between 2x2GB sticks and 4x1GB sticks... how big is the difference?

i currently got 2 dual channel kits (2x1GB) to total 4 gb, it is all same brand and speed i got 2 identical kits, im just worried that im losing a lot of performance.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/663086-ddr2-4x1gb-vs-2x2gb/
Share on other sites

exactly

there isnt a noticeable performance difference, but there is a stability issue . especially if your OC-ing.

not to mention - some motherboards simply get flakey when all DIMM slots are being used.

Depends on the motherboard and manufacturer. Stock motherboards (like the **** rags you get from HP) will have stability issues when the maximum memory capacity of the motherboard is reached...

Depends on the motherboard and manufacturer. Stock motherboards (like the **** rags you get from HP) will have stability issues when the maximum memory capacity of the motherboard is reached...

yeah, I know that some mobos will get flakey when capacity is being used as far as amount of RAM, I was referring to all DIMMS being used regardless of size.

I know its mainly the crap ones -- but lets face it - most people dont demand ASUS in their comps

yeah, I know that some mobos will get flakey when capacity is being used as far as amount of RAM, I was referring to all DIMMS being used regardless of size.

I know its mainly the crap ones -- but lets face it - most people dont demand ASUS in their comps

Actually i have an Asus P5K :p

the only reason why I would suggest 2x2GB over 4x1GB is because something that's called Full Loading.

Slighter older systems (socket 939 etc) have some issues running 4 DDR sticks at very high speeds. When the motherboard (or rather the BIOS) think it won't be capable of running it smoothly, it would downclock the RAM bus (and sometimes even the FSB clock) thus losing performance.

However most (modern) systems don't have these problems and don't care about Full Loading.

Also .. should Full Loading occur in your system, you can overwrite the system to use the preferred clock speed by setting the RAM speeds by hand.

That said .. I run 4x1GB just fine.. and so could you..

Actually, it isn't just "cheap" boards that would have issues with 4 DIMMs, although it's more likely that they will. All four DIMMs filled could affect overclockability, additionally the same amount of throughput is gained with 2?2GB really so you just end up stressing the MCH more for nothing.

I have a really cheap biostar that was only $49 and I run 4x1GB with no problems. I do agree with 2x2gb however, no reason to get all 1 gb unless you already have some 1 gb sticks (Which is why i have 4x1gb) 2x2 gives you better upgrade options as you have slots open.

If getting entirely new sticks of RAM go 2x2GB, reason? As previously stated, some boards don't run as well with all DIMM slots filled.

If upgrading from old RAM (I assume 2x1GB) then just get another 2x1GB dual channel kit (of preferably the same RAM). Be prepared for the scenario that your motherboard may not like having all it's DIMM's filled, and that your overclockability of your processor will be decreased.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft fixes one of Excel Copilot's most frustrating limitations by Usama Jawad Microsoft began integrating Copilot into Excel a couple of years ago and has been upgrading it with new functionalities since then. While some changes have been controversial, Microsoft is hoping to win over users by allowing them to be more productive via Copilot. To that end, it has now announced a Copilot improvement that may actually be appreciated by people who use it regularly. Excel customers often use the Copilot prompt box to issue instructions to format and customize their data, but it can become quite tiring to keep repeating the same instructions again and again. Microsoft now allows you to define Copilot personalization rules for formatting, naming conventions, formulas, and report styles. These can be accessed via Settings > Personalization, where you can explain your rules in natural language like "Always format currency in USD with no decimals", and just let Copilot take care of the rest. Microsoft is going a step further in this direction by allowing you to set workbook rules too. These rules are stored as a .Rules sheet, and are preserved while the workbook is shared. This fosters collaboration while making sure that standard rules govern the Copilot editing experience across the organization. Other advantages of this capability include pointing it to specific examples, defining dynamic formulas, and referencing an entire sheet and asking Copilot to infer rules based on that. You can leverage this feature by opening Copilot in Excel, clicking on "+", and selecting Create workbook rules. If you have an existing .Rules sheet, you can simply start listing the rules in column A as well. Personalization features are available to all Copilot in Excel users across the web, Mac, and Windows. Meanwhile, workbook rules are currently being previewed for Windows and Mac customers on the Insiders channel. General availability is scheduled after a few weeks, but a concrete date is currently unknown. Overall, the Excel capability is quite similar to ChatGPT's memory features, which allow you to permanently store items in the AI model's context window.
    • Imagine you still haven't discovered Total Commander that is doing all those things for three decades already...
    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!