Fifa 09 - First Review In Gets A 9/10!


Recommended Posts

Official PlayStation Magazine, have a great review of Fifa 09 out, it isn't even in the shops yet, some subscribers get it early however.

For your viewing pleasure here are the scans.

Page 1 : http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm317/EpiQ7/swti5d.jpg

Page 2 : http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm317/EpiQ7/2vb0htz.jpg

Page 3 : http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm317/EpiQ7/ohuxig.jpg

Page 4 : http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm317/EpiQ7/oj2gp5.jpg

Page 5 : http://img514.imageshack.us/my.php?image=f...viewopm6uf7.jpg

Great review, cant wait for the Demo and then October 3rd.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/663298-fifa-09-first-review-in-gets-a-910/
Share on other sites

from the videos(i've seen) 1st touch looks unresponsive and heavy + the ball is too 'floaty'

but until i play the demo i won't dismiss fifa, pes2008 looked decent from videos(and i bought it) but it turned out to be worst in the series.

From what i've seen, and im pretty sure i've watched every video FIFA looks outstanding this year, i personally think that Euro 2008 is better than Fifa 08 purely from a gameplay perspective, the balls, runs, movement, touches are all better.

I was an absolute die hard PES fan, but i have to be honest, i dont see how people can claim PES is the best anymore, because the fact of the matter is, is that it isn't, it just isn't and its not like its even close, they are miles apart.

PES havent invested in licences, or forked up any of the mega cash theyve made off the series for licences or leagues where as FIFA have, theyve expanded and got more and more leagues every year, they've invested in features such as Be A Pro, which PES have copied with "Become a Legend" - and its a pretty poor implementation at that.

PES vs FIFA = No Contest.

Fifa has :

- Revolutionary Gameplay

- New Ball Physics

- New Player Movements

- Custom Tactics (Finally!)

- Custom Control Scheme Inc. Online (Finally!)

- Improved Graphics

- All the latest Transfers

- All of the Best Leagues

- Extra Licences

- More Stadiums (All Authentic Representations)

- Skill Moves Which Are Quality!

- Referee and Linesmen on the Pitch

PES Has ...

- Dropped Bayern Munich Licence, and bought Zenit St Petersburg

- Has Two Premiership Teams

- Has International Teams

- Feels too Arcadey

- First "Next Gen" Version was Horrendous!

- No Innovation since PES 6

PES havent expanded with the money that we as customers handed over to them. FIFA have! and thats why FIFA is now definitively the best football game on the Planet!

I'm really looking forward to this being released, I really enjoyed Fifa 08 and I thought that Euro 2008 was excellent to play. I've preordered it for release day and may be tempted enough to take the day off work as well. As for this years Pro evo I think I may rent it from Blockbuster or wait till it comes down in price before purchasing it. Fingers crossed that they release a demo of Fifa 09 before release day.

I'm really looking forward to this being released, I really enjoyed Fifa 08 and I thought that Euro 2008 was excellent to play. I've preordered it for release day and may be tempted enough to take the day off work as well. As for this years Pro evo I think I may rent it from Blockbuster or wait till it comes down in price before purchasing it. Fingers crossed that they release a demo of Fifa 09 before release day.

Where have you been?! Under a Rock!

Demo is out on PSN and XBL September 11th

I enjoyed FIFA 08 even though it had some glitches and problems that annoyed me. They fixed most of those annoying things in Euro 2008, which was better than FIFA 08, and I am definitely looking forward to FIFA 09.

FIFA 09 may be the best game ever made for this sport.

I dont understand how any of you can even say FIFA is better than PES....

FIFA is slow, boring, and just plain EA.....PES blows it out of the water year after year.

And no new things in PES?: "If it aint broke, dont fix it"

rather controversial comment.

For those who care, Euro 2008 implemented fixes to the engine, making gameplay much better. PES2008 was a very lazy port. This review is by the Official mag, so no doubt all scores are above 7/10, wait till the independents get it. I doubt it will be any less than brilliant.

Fifa is now way better than Pro Evolution Soccer.

Fifa is far superior because of huge advances in these areas...

  • Ball Control
  • Ball Physics
  • Player Movement
  • Dribbling
  • Skill Moves
  • Licenced Teams
  • Tournaments
  • Online Play (Yes it really can be Lag free!)
  • Be A Pro : Seasons
  • Goalkeeper Reactions/Responsiveness
  • Linesmen
  • Referees
  • Stadiums
  • Fifa Interactive World Cup
  • Celebrations
  • Custom Team Tactics
  • Custom Control Schemes
  • Custom Formations
  • Adidas Live Season - Real World Player Data In The Game
  • Manager Mode
  • Crowds - More Realistic
  • Commentators - Sky Sports Team

Pro Evolution had its chance and Konami/Seabass absolutely f***ed it up for us all. We didnt particularly care about authenticity, but now theyre just milking its past reputation as the best football simulation out there.

Why dont Konami sink some real cash and get the official FIFPRO Licence?! They have the money, they just dont want to spend it.

Fans pay a fortune for the game, PES2008 for PS3 was ?44.99! despite Seabass saying that "they never wanted to release the game in that state" yet Konami still slap a ?44.99 price tag on it, even though they know its shi*, that to me shows how much they value fans!.

They've done nothing innovative, Become a Legend is a Be A Pro rip off. They havent got any official teams which is a disgrace, im sorry but two teams dont count in my book, and the stadiums are horrendous, the grass textures are just plain poor!

PES2009 is basically PES2008 without the issues, its what PES2008 should have been, theyve basically spent a year polishing the game that they released last year. EA have spent the year innovating, Adidas Live Season for gods sake! its a herculean task, its never been done before, but EA have the money and clout to try something this adventurous.

Konami have done absolutely nothing, I used to be a die hard Pro Evo Fan, but since their PS2 version its all gone horribly wrong.

EA now have the best football simulation on the planet, and whats more, they thoroughly deserve it, because they have earned it.

I don't want to sound like a hater, but after coming out with a new FIFA game every year for god knows how long (since 1995? idk), they should really be scoring more than 9/10.

I agree but this is only the 2nd iteration of the series on the PS3 and they did build it from scratch compared to the previous 6 years on the PS2. I must say that the FIFA team has done a very good job in just two years of work.

It's funny to see that people still argue about this :laugh:

It should be clear by now that these are completely different games, each with its own pace and gameplay.

Personally I like the faster (almost arcade-like) gameplay of PES, but that doesn't mean it's better than Fifa, not by any chance, they're just different games. It's like comparing Fifa with Fifa Street, they're both football/soccer games but very different at the same time.

I have Fifa08 for the Wii and I enjoy it with the Wiimote/Nunchuck, it's fresh and fun. When I'm with my friends we play PES, we find it more amusing and fast paced.

Fanboys and girls, stop trying to push your personal preference, to each his own I say.

I was a total PES Lover ever since PES2.......Through college PES4, 5 & 6 was all that me and my mates played. We tried Fifa's games each year but we just loved PES so much more.

But along comes PES08 and its poor attempt at being a Next Gen game and I tried Fifa08 with my mates. It was totally different, PES just plain sucked, the visuals, the slow down you got in penatly boxes, it was just plain dyer. Now Fifa 08 was an absolute diamond of a footy game, it did infact blow PES08 out of the water.

Now in regards to PES09 and Fifa09, I cannot wait for either of them. I have been following PES09 closely as I really wanna go back to my PES loving days and PES09 is looking a million times better than PES08. So fingers crossed it ends up like that, but I am still going to give Fifa 09 a chance too, its looking good and sounds great from the Review.

I will no doubt buy PES09 (If good) for the PS3 and Fifa09 for the 360.

This review is by the Official mag, so no doubt all scores are above 7/10, wait till the independents get it. I doubt it will be any less than brilliant.

Good point! I hope they give it a better review in the gamesmaster magazine as previous titles in the Fifa series have not done very well. Although no matter what the review I will be getting it on release day, I've preordered it from Argos @ ?34.99.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!