[Official] Mercenaries 2


Recommended Posts

My only complaint is the sound, the enemies get annoying. I had to push the graphics down to Medium or they broke hardcore, but then I upgraded 175.16 drivers to 177.92 which is definately faster. I think they may have fixed things up as well.

I definately think the game seems unfinished in more than one way, but I'm happy they released it around the same time as the console ports for a change. I didn't want the Xbox 360 version, or I'd have bought that. :p

They'll probably have a patch soon enough that improves things.

They'll probably have a patch soon enough that improves things.

I doubt it. Half Life 2 looks (and runs) better. I can't see them releasing a 2gb patch to improve textures.

What happened to EA saying we'll release games WHEN THEY ARE FINISHED?!

Thats insane, no 16:10 resolutions, that should be standard by now, how the hell do they test this games when they are doing Quality Assurance, on 14" monitors at 800 * 600 ???

I was so excited to get this, might just skip it, can someone post some pics (taken by you).

Well according to the Merc 2 forums which are full of complaints, the avail resolutions for the PC game is -

640x480

800x600

1024x768

1152x864

1280x720

1600x1200

Well everyone is getting different resolution reports but those are the main ones. Some can only go to 1152x864 though

Pretty poor imo

i only have one major complaint at the moment about this game and thats the inability to play with some other PAL players on the 360 [afaik atm]

otherwise its a good game that'll keep me ocupied for a fair while once i can play co-op :blink:

It's not very good, tbh (PS3 version here).

Main gripes are:

1. Aiming is terribly awkward - the more you move the stick to the left/right, the faster it accelerates to the left/right. It just feels very strange and taking a lot of time getting used to.

2. The aiming reticule has little relation to where your bullets go - it's basically a case of 1 clip for 1 kill.

3. Hit detection is abysmal.

4. Enemies seem to consist of 2 men in a jeep for the most part and, early in the game, your weapons aren't suited to taking them out. Comically, if the jeep turns over, the man in the gun at the rear of the jeep stays there...on his side. Bit lame.

5. Comparison to GTA are silly - there are vast swathes of empty landscape, the textures are plain and just look terrible.

6. As with most EA games lately, some obstacles trap you and you have to jumpjumpjumpthrowjoysitkcaround to get free. Happened in Bad Company too...

7. Graphics don't appear to be anti-aliased.

I could tolerate most of that but the aiming system and stupid inaccuracy of the guns makes it incredibly tedious to kill anything.

Does anyone know why they keep doing these kind of games in 3rd person? I think 1st person would be much more fun, just keep 3rd person for vehicles, I really don't like my character on screen, imo it doesn't fully immerse you in the game. If you just see the weapon your holding any nothing else that makes it more realistic and fun.

Yes, cuz it's entirely realistic to look down and not see, you know.. shoes.

Or legs.

Or my giant e-pen0r.

;)

I doubt it. Half Life 2 looks (and runs) better. I can't see them releasing a 2gb patch to improve textures.

What happened to EA saying we'll release games WHEN THEY ARE FINISHED?!

I hate to say it, but had EA not picked it up to publish and forced multiple ports, it might have been more solid. Even if there was simply timed-exclusivity, all ports might have been better.

Just wait for a patch. I suspect after one patch the game'll be pretty solid.

The graphics are fine if you up the view distance and use 177.92 drivers, I wasn't impressed at all at first but it's decent with some tweaking.

The sound though? They keep repeating the same crap over and over nonstop. I don't know if thats just a glitch but its irritating as all hell. I like wandering around more than doing missions because of that.

I am surprised to see a game released in this state, but I would've bought the 360 version if it'd been another six months to the PC version, so I guess I can see where they're coming from releasing as is.

Heed my warning when I say it's a very bad game on the PC. There's no option for 16:10 resolutions, the textures are really bad, and the controls are pathetic. I doubt the console versions are that much better. It's unfortunate because this game had so much potential. I actually looked forward to blowing up buildings and vehicles in a sandbox type environment. Oh well...

Heed my warning when I say it's a very bad game on the PC. There's no option for 16:10 resolutions, the textures are really bad, and the controls are pathetic. I doubt the console versions are that much better. It's unfortunate because this game had so much potential. I actually looked forward to blowing up buildings and vehicles in a sandbox type environment. Oh well...

It's terrible on the consoles too. I don't think I have come across a person that has not mentioned a problem for each console they own the game for. I own it on the Xbox 360 and it's just problems everywhere. Especially achievement glitches which may not matter to some but do to others. It's terrible. I was looking forward to this game for so long, they could of just delayed it, again. I had so much fun playing the first Mercenaries and wanted to experience that fun again with Mercenaries 2 and on the latest consoles but no, can't really.

Also to what randomevent said, I no doubt expect a patch from them. But I highly doubt we will see a "pretty solid" patch. If they could not get how may problems this game has prior to releasing it and the delays it had, then they are never going to get it right. May even break the game more...

I rented this game through Gamefly for the PS3 (the 360 version was long wait), and this game is what it is. What I mean is it does what it does very well, and it is definitely enjoyable and fun to play if you are not in the mood to play a serious game that requires much thought. You blow stuff up, run around and blow some more stuff up while shooting some guys, and that is the basic premise, and sometimes it is just fun to blow stuff up. It has a somewhat open world approach from what I have seen (have only taken over the Villa so far), so honestly I think it is a good game, as again it delivers on its promise of blowing stuff up.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Formatting would be awesome if fully customised and then roll out the settings as a company wide standard.
    • I just want to know why the volume control feature in the browser version keeps appearing then disappearing, here today - gone tomorrow. Now it's gone again. Annoying as hell.
    • When you have only lies and blood libels to present, you've lost. And how hard is it for you to look up BBC and AP? You hate Jews, just admit it.
    • This article does not make sense and it’s very evident, the bug wasn’t confirmed to exist, because the application itself runs on editions of Windows which make it impossible to run Hyper-V VMs on, “Basically, Claude Desktop on Windows spins up a 1.8GB Hyper-V virtual machine if you use Claude Cowork or agent mode even once.”, suggests the bug is caused by something else otherwise it would only happen to users with the capability of running Hyper-V VMs and that’s only if Hyper-V was enabled which is by default not enabled. The true issue is that the author who reported the bug used the incorrect terminology, it’s actually a container, not a VM that is being started by the way. There were users on macOS reporting the same issue, Hyper-V, doesn’t exist on that platform obviously. Every single user who confirmed the problem in the last week was either using macOS making this issue impossible to be relevant to them, or was a comment talking about WSL, which the author indicated 3 months ago was disabled.
    • “To prevent hallucination issues and keep the database clean, the platform uses a multi-agent verification loop to check code quality.” - This absolutely isn’t happening. ”Before the massive rise of LLMs, which tanked its traffic by about 50% over the last couple of years, Stack Overflow was the go-to website for millions of programmers seeking coding solutions.” - It still is trusted, because the community of users, blocked other users from submitting false and misleading answers generated by AI agents that can be convinced something it generated is actually incorrect even if it’s actually correct. The company itself doesn’t know what it wants to be so it keeps trying and failing to introduce AI features to the platform. This effort will also fail, already submitted one successful poison pill, look forward to generating more.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sopa flores earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      lamborghiniv10 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      211
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      83
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!