Recommended Posts

They're about the same speed, and about the same for compatibility with the specs.

Try both and use the one you want, Firefox and Opera are both great browsers.

(Y)

I have both installed and I switch between the two, I started having problems with FF3 so I will wait until a new update comes out, for the moment I am using Opera 9.5 happily :)

Also I use Chrome for more general browsing since its faster for me than the others.

Contacting Opera is a no go as it appears I have to pay for support? or at least purchase opera, which I will not be doing any time soon.

$29 is a bit cheeky of them :o Does Opera Mail just use your current email address? The same way as Windows Live Mail, I might be interested in using it.

$29 is a bit cheeky of them :o Does Opera Mail just use your current email address? The same way as Windows Live Mail, I might be interested in using it.

I have no idea on that as I don't have an opera email account, nor have I set up any email within the browser install. As mentioned I can find nothing in the settings either :( If it wasn't for the error message every time I start it, I would use Opera

I'm inclined to say FireFox. It has some WICKED add ons. One of my favourites is the page drag one, as I can quickly scroll to the bottom of the page without going to my keyboard. The mouseless browsing add on is also pretty sweet. Maxthon 2 has a similar set of cool add ons and features, the best of which is undoing closing a tab. Opera's add ons strike me as more gimicky than useful.

Opera has an integrated ad-blocker, as well as a tabscroller (rightclick+scroll) ;)

Opera also has the full noscript ability, you can block anythign you want easiest is through tools and quick preferences, that might only affect the site youa re on though. Not sure, I never really have a need for noscript.

As for speed, yeah opera is definately faster than other browsers, especially FF. most tests only test JS persomance anyway, and there's a lot more to loading a webpage than javascript, despite what chrome wants you to think. Opera also has the hands down most instant back forward cache loading, fast forware is also usefull, and you can just use the forward button on your mouse to go to the next results in searchs and many other sites with multiple pages.

I think the best thing to do is download and try them all out, then decide for yourself. But for what it is worth, I was using Firefox 3. I loved the features and the extensions. There seems to be some stability issues with Flash and Firefox on my install. Not sure if this is a widespread problem or not.

I didn't really care for Opera 9's look-and-feel. It also seemed to render pages slower than Firefox 3 did. My first visit to iGoogle resulted in some infinite refresh loop which was disappointing.

The Google browser, Chrome, isn't too bad. It definitely opens a lot faster than the other two. Page loads are extremely snappy on my system in comparison to IE, Opera, and Firefox. It doesn't have the same page zoom options that Firefox and Opera have (and I enjoy), just your basic font size increase/decrease options. Lacks add-ons (like some essential *ahem* page clean up extensions). I cannot comment on its stability yet. It does have a spellcheck (Y).

Hope that helps... :)

Opera for me, been using it since ver5 and it hasn't let me down since. Of course i always go back and try whatever the other companies want to throw against Opera but they always fail, imo anyways. Although lately Opera has been acting very weird in my linux install, it crashes often but i know exactly why so no worries.

I use FF3 and Opera 9.6b; I have problems with opera crashing from time to time when a page with certain multimedia applets load (i havent figured out if it is flash, silverlight, or what- or if it might be a javascript error)

has anyone else had this problem?

It is most probably flash. I have the same problem you have and been having it for quite some time actually. Are you on Linux or windows? I know my problem is because of flash on linux, if you are experiencing these crashes on windows, then it might be something else. But the good thing about using opera is, even with the crashing is still much faster than FF3 on my box. It uses alittle more ram than FF3 but i have plenty of ram for it so i'm not really worried about it.

It is most probably flash. I have the same problem you have and been having it for quite some time actually. Are you on Linux or windows? I know my problem is because of flash on linux, if you are experiencing these crashes on windows, then it might be something else. But the good thing about using opera is, even with the crashing is still much faster than FF3 on my box. It uses alittle more ram than FF3 but i have plenty of ram for it so i'm not really worried about it.

I am using Windows; before I use to get a lot of crashes on opera and ie and found out when I upgraded my antivirus from the free avast to the Kaspersky Antivirus a lot of the crashes went away and dont get that many on opera like I used to - I am thinking to that it might be the rendering engine that opera uses compared to the others (there was a post a few days ago talking about the different engines that the browsers use)

I also moved from Firefox to Opera when I got fed up with Firefox2 being so ****ing slow. After that I've tried Firefox3 which is a lot better but it's still not better than Opera. Unfortunately some javascript heavy sites run a bit slow in Opera (Facebook in particular) other than that, I'd take Opera over any other browser any day. It just FEELS fast and snappy

I also moved from Firefox to Opera when I got fed up with Firefox2 being so ****ing slow. After that I've tried Firefox3 which is a lot better but it's still not better than Opera. Unfortunately some javascript heavy sites run a bit slow in Opera (Facebook in particular) other than that, I'd take Opera over any other browser any day. It just FEELS fast and snappy

Opera's market share is so pathetic, even though I find people use it all the time, just like me.

I don't get it.

If there are a few Firefox addons you really like or if you like to customize your browser to death, then Firefox is the way to go. If you just want the best browser out of the box then Opera wins hands down.

Also, Opera has been the fastest and lightest browser in most tests for a couple of years now.

  • 3 months later...
I think the best thing to do is download and try them all out, then decide for yourself . .

I believe you have to do more than just try them out.

You have to live with a browser for a while and learn its hidden features.

With Opera, it has so many neat features built into it standard that you would never discover half of them just by trying it out. Once you start using them, you'll wonder how you managed without them and other browsers will seem lame by comparison.

Opera have tried hard to catch up with their rivals but it's still Firefox for me . .

You may be new to internet browsers, because for many years and in many ways, Opera has been an innovator that others have followed. For instance I have seen many FF advocates claim their browser was the first to introduce tabbed browsing, when actually Opera introduced it in 2000, (and there were other little-known browsers before which had tabs). Mozilla, (FF's precursor), didn't introduce that feature 'til 2003.

For me Opera is the only choice, not only for speed and usability features, but also security and compliance.

16 Dec 2008 - Firefox named most vulnerable Windows application.

17 Dec 2008 - Internet Explorer zero-day vulnerability flaw, which is given the highest severity rating of critical, affects all versions of Microsoft's IE Web browser

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I recently tried edge. It seems a lot better. A lot of the junk in it is gone. It seems less bloated and snappy.
    • Lethal fake phone chargers are still being sold on Amazon and eBay, UK watchdog warns by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels The UK consumer rights organization, Which?, is claiming that “potentially lethal knock-off chargers” are still being sold on online marketplaces seven years after it exposed the danger of these chargers. In its latest investigation, it bought 15 USB phone chargers from several online marketplaces and found they were missing key information, meaning they cannot be legally sold in the UK. Which? bought the 15 chargers from seven online marketplaces. These were Amazon (including Amazon Haul), AliExpress, B&Q Marketplace, Debenhams Marketplace, and eBay. It said that the chargers were so badly made that anyone using them was at risk of electric shock. Over half the chargers also posed fire and explosion risks. Of the chargers purchased, one was a fake Apple USB-C 35W power adaptor charger. To confuse buyers, the box was branded with an Apple logo, but testing found it to be a fake. Further testing picked up arcing sounds after 10 seconds of use, where a current jumps between two parts of the electrical circuit, which can cause fires, explosions, or electric shock. The manufacturers of this particular charger also put modeling clay inside it to make it feel more weighty, robust, and genuine. Not all of the chargers were technically faulty; however, some were missing key packaging, markings, and documentation, meaning they can’t be sold in the UK legally. Which? said that it is now campaigning alongside a coalition of safety groups and businesses for new laws that make online marketplaces responsible for ensuring the safety of products that they choose to list on their websites. It also said the government needs to start using powers under the Product Regulation and Metrology Act, which was adopted last July, to impose safety requirements on online marketplaces via secondary legislation, but so far, there have been delays. No matter what country you are in, be sure to properly research what you are buying and only buy authentic chargers to prevent fires. You can read more about Which?’s research here.
    • Visual Studio finally gets long-awaited feature that developers will love by Usama Jawad Visual Studio Code is Microsoft's popular, lightweight, open-source code editor, it is actually Visual Studio that is the company's flagship integrated development environment (IDE). Although the IDE already offers a boatload of useful features for developers, Microsoft has finally introduced a long-requested capability that will be loved by many. While developers have already been able to create Git pull requests (PRs) directly within Visual Studio for the past couple of years, it had not been possible to review a PR without switching to the browser, until now. Microsoft revealed in December 2025 that it is working on UX that enables developers to do just that, and fast-forward to June 2026, and Visual Studio finally has native capabilities to open and inspect a PR, discuss feedback, and wrap up the review, all without switching to the browser. This integration works for both GitHub and Azure DevOps (including on-prem). Developers have access to multiple surfaces to open a PR, including Git Repository, Git Changes, and the Git menu in Visual Studio. Once you open a PR, all the important details will be immediately visible to you, from where you can navigate to various levels of granularity and branch states, depending on the reviews that you are engaged in. As you would expect, you also get a diff view that enables you to see code changes inline or side-by-side in a separate panel. You can also review commit-by-commit. Additionally, this UX fosters collaboration as you can leave comments, reply to threads, and resolve conversations easily. Naturally, you can also leverage Copilot to apply a code suggestion to fix a potential issue. When you are done, you have the ability to approve, complete, and merge the PR. This is a pretty major feature as it has been requested heavily for the past few years. You can try it out in Visual Studio 2026 version 18.7, made available here recently. Microsoft plans to enhance this experience further in future releases with comment filtering, a timeline of PR activity, and more.
    • This AdGuard Family lifetime deal is still only $15.97 by Steven Parker Today's highlighted Neowin Deal comes via our Apps + Software section, where you can get a lifetime subscription and save 90% on a lifetime AdGuard Family Plan. AdGuard is a unique program that has all the necessary features for what they claim to be "the best web experience." The software combines the an advanced ad blocker, a privacy protection module, and a parental control tool—all working in one app. This software deals with annoying ads, hides your data from a multitude of trackers, protects you from malware attacks, and even lets you restrict your kids from accessing inappropriate content. Install AdGuard and see the internet as it was supposed to be: clean and safe. Get rid of annoying banners, pop-ups & video ads once and for all Hide your data from the multitude of trackers & activity analyzers that swarm the web Avoid fraudulent and phishing website and malware attacks Protect your kids online by restricting them from accessing inappropriate & adult content Good to know Family Plan Length of access: lifetime This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Max number of devices: 9 Access options: desktop & mobile Software version: AdGuard Family Updates included A lifetime subscription of AdGuard Family Plan normally costs $169.99, but this deal can be yours for just $15.97, that's a saving of $157.02. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this AdGuard Family lifetime deal for just $15.97 (was $169.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support! Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • the MCT currently downloads 26200.8653, so not completely up to date.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      FBSPL went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      174
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!