Nobody Will Buy a Warm and Fuzzy Bill Gates


Recommended Posts

Nobody Will Buy a Warm and Fuzzy Bill Gates

The first Microsoft ad with Jerry Seinfeld is out, and it's baffling, even sad. The clip has Seinfeld finding Microsoft founder Bill Gates in a discount shoe store. A bit of silly (not funny) patter follows. The ad ends with the only mention of computers and a shake of Gates's butt. I'm not kidding. As MG Siegler notes at VentureBeat:

The tagline for this one: "The future. Delicious." I think this is more "yuck" than "yum."

It's hard to find anyone applauding the ad, except the occasional Microsoft employee. The bit is merely the first in a $300 million image campaign, explains a Microsoft exec (via Michael Arrington at TechCrunch:

The first phase of this campaign is designed to engage consumers and spark a new conversation about Windows?a conversation that will evolve as the campaign progresses but will always be marked by humor and humanity.

The ad's only purpose that I can see is to humanize Gates. He's done a great job already at improving his image with his charitable foundation. But he is not warm and fuzzy. Gates, like archrival Apple CEO Steve Jobs, is a driven, tough competitor who's known for a huge temper and for taking joy in the vanquishing of any company that gets in his way.

Apple, in its popular Mac vs. PC ads, has made no effort to rehab Jobs's image.

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/daves-download...bill-gates.html

I saw this earlier today and had to have a little chuckle. I don't think this was supposed to be "groundbreaking" rather a first in a series of ads just to get people interested. That is the first step really, get people ask questions (even if they are dumb questions :p).

Still better than the stupid Mac ads.

+1 When the Mac ads first came out there were cute funny but now there are pathetic and sad and full of BS. Yet Microsoft did not put any company down to make there ad witch I think is a big plus for Microsoft.

Still better than the stupid Mac ads.

This Microsoft Ad is a completely different type of Ad.

I find the Apple Ad's far more entertaining and 'fun'. They make me chuckle.

The Microsoft / Gates / Seinfeld Ad is best best described in emots: :blink: :huh: :s :ermm: :dontgetit: :geek:

I think its cute. Didn't make much sense, but I guess the tactics in it are to get people's attention as if it were not just another commercial, and then flash the Microsoft logos at the end when everyone is looking. Risky but may work.

Microsoft is forever out of touch with whats hip. Why pay so much to get a 50 year old comedian whose popularity peaked 10 years ago to market your products in an attempt to shake the dork image?

If they were smart they would have got someone like Sarah Silverman or Dave Chappelle. You may not like their humour but at least they are relevant and hip to the times.

I must say, the more I watch this ad the more I love it. It's a subtle situational comedy, but it makes me laugh out loud every time.

I hope they keep them in the same vein from here on out (Y)

But what is this ad selling? Shoes? A new image for Microsoft? A new image for Vista?

I'm sorry, the Mac ads do attack Vista, but at least it makes people consider buying a Mac in 30 seconds.

And the rest lose the respect for Apple in the same 30 seconds.

does anyone know anywhere which hosts this video as a downloadable file? like not streaming... im using a gsm connection (=56k speed) through some crappy assed wireless carrier and it seems to redirect me to this error page every megabyte or so, so i absolutely need to be able to resume downloads to be able to watch this ad....

The ad doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, but at least it's better than the tasteless Apple ads. Mac users and the whole "Mac image" is one of the reasons I'm moving back to PCs after using Macs for about a year and a half.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • did you give it permission to do so? its probably on the ToS. After that South Park episode I'm paying attention to them lol
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!