Nobody Will Buy a Warm and Fuzzy Bill Gates


Recommended Posts

I'm going to say it again because it appears that when I said this earlier it was lost on most people. This ad was the first of a series to get people's attention, to get them TALKING. They have people's attention (good or bad) now and how where and what they show from now make people listen.

I'm going to say it again because it appears that when I said this earlier it was lost on most people. This ad was the first of a series to get people's attention, to get them TALKING. They have people's attention (good or bad) now and how where and what they show from now make people listen.

what if it was so bad that it made people want to switch to a different channel at the next sight of bill gates on their tv... but then again it might have some negative psychology going on, like some of that 'so bad its good' stuff...

Brilliant ad,

its doing its job (getting people to discuss it), a change from past microsoft ads, and its funny!

In a similar vein to the sony ads that people don't 'get', I think it's great!

Adverts that just read, buy this product, only ?x.99 etc are for infomercials and should stay there, this is clever and funny and I hope to see more!:DD

Edit: and yes, i did laugh out loud

Gates, like archrival Apple CEO Steve Jobs, is a driven, tough competitor who's known for a huge temper and for taking joy in the vanquishing of any company that gets in his way.

Excuse me? Bill has NEVER been like that AFAIK....

Steve is another issue...

I'm going to say it again because it appears that when I said this earlier it was lost on most people. This ad was the first of a series to get people's attention, to get them TALKING. They have people's attention (good or bad) now and how where and what they show from now make people listen.

finally, someone gets it. xD

I'm going to say it again because it appears that when I said this earlier it was lost on most people. This ad was the first of a series to get people's attention, to get them TALKING. They have people's attention (good or bad) now and how where and what they show from now make people listen.

They got tech savvy people's attention. You cannot base the response from tech savvy people and say that got people talking about it. They got people who have already made their minds up on Vista talking about, but those people don't matter. It is average users who matter.

I have seen the ad run in my market about a dozen times now (that's one station, so I imagine it has ran on others as well). Yet no one that I have talked to that are non-savvy people have seen it. Or if they have, they didn't notice it. But they remember those Apple ads though. Simple and funny. A pure white background without anything extra going on to distract the viewer.

I'm going to say it again because it appears that when I said this earlier it was lost on most people. This ad was the first of a series to get people's attention, to get them TALKING. They have people's attention (good or bad) now and how where and what they show from now make people listen.

The flaw in your argument is that the average TV viewer who sees this ad will remember it months later when the next one in the series comes out to expand the "plot" or whatever you want to call it. The people that Microsoft needs to target for their ads are the non-tech savy people who are deciding whether to buy a new PC or a new Mac. Because, lets be honest the tech savy people already know which platform they want/need and why; and, no amount of TV ads is going to change that. Therefore, using a marketing scheme that encompasses several different ads in order to convey the entire message that "Vista is not crap" to the general public is stupid. Most people instantly forget TV commercials because we see so damn many of them no a days.

They got tech savvy people's attention. You cannot base the response from tech savvy people and say that got people talking about it. They got people who have already made their minds up on Vista talking about, but those people don't matter. It is average users who matter.

I have seen the ad run in my market about a dozen times now (that's one station, so I imagine it has ran on others as well). Yet no one that I have talked to that are non-savvy people have seen it. Or if they have, they didn't notice it. But they remember those Apple ads though. Simple and funny. A pure white background without anything extra going on to distract the viewer.

I agree with Hurmoth. The ads need to be quick, engaging, and to the point. IMO, the "mojave" videos (or at least the idea behind them) would have been the perfect thing to put in a national TV ad campaign.

I agree with Hurmoth. The ads need to be quick, engaging, and to the point. IMO, the "mojave" videos (or at least the idea behind them) would have been the perfect thing to put in a national TV ad campaign.

Actually, since you mentioned that, I saw a Mojave ad over the weekend. I want to say it was on TNT (I think I was watching Law & Order). It was probably a 30 second ad with people looking at Vista and giving their opinion and then the Windows logo and the web address to see more about the experiment.

But I only saw it once and that was it.

You guys have to realize that things have changed for Bill. He was driven, and quite brilliant in ruthless business tactics. But something happened to him. He met Melinda. Meeting a good woman, as often does for a man, opened his eyes to things in life that really matter. Since that time in just a few years, their foundation has spent more money even adjusted for inflation than the Rockefeller Foundation has in a century. Bill is a new man. Steve Jobs, on the other hand, is still waist deep in the fight.

And I'm agreeing with you. Relax. We still love you. :)

NO! Don't love me! AHHH!!!! :p

I'm just saying that if they're trying to market to tech savvy people, then they've already lost. I spent a little time this morning showing some people at work the ad and they went, "Huh?" People aren't getting it.

While we as tech savvy people may get it, Microsoft's marketing department failed for the average user. The Mojave ad is what they need to focus on I think.

Actually, since you mentioned that, I saw a Mojave ad over the weekend. I want to say it was on TNT (I think I was watching Law & Order). It was probably a 30 second ad with people looking at Vista and giving their opinion and then the Windows logo and the web address to see more about the experiment.

But I only saw it once and that was it.

Oh was it on TV? I didn't know that. I've just seen those videos in streaming ads online. I guess to clarify, IMO Microsoft should have used the Mojave videos in place of the Seinfeld commercials on Fox/ABC during primetime football hours. I must have seen the Seinfeld commercial at least a dozen times while I was watching football yesterday afternoon.

Oh was it on TV? I didn't know that. I've just seen those videos in streaming ads online. I guess to clarify, IMO Microsoft should have used the Mojave videos in place of the Seinfeld commercials on Fox/ABC during primetime football hours. I must have seen the Seinfeld commercial at least a dozen times while I was watching football yesterday afternoon.

Yup, but like I said only once :( I bet all those football fans were like, "Who's that guy with the haircut? Does he go to the same place Donald Trump does for a haircut?" :p

NO! Don't love me! AHHH!!!! :p

I'm just saying that if they're trying to market to tech savvy people, then they've already lost. I spent a little time this morning showing some people at work the ad and they went, "Huh?" People aren't getting it.

While we as tech savvy people may get it, Microsoft's marketing department failed for the average user. The Mojave ad is what they need to focus on I think.

While the Mojave ads may be more in line with what they need, it is certainly not enough. I was talking to a non-tech savvy person about the ad (they actually brought it up) and he said that he doesn't believe it. He thinks it's BS and that they planted the people there and that it's not true first-hand accounts.

I think they need a whole different direction completely. Why not just show the actual product and highlight the features and contrast them with XP and other offerings out there today? Keep it simple, short and to the point. That Bill Gates Seinfeld ad is like a mini-movie. I really think it just loses it's audience after a while, especially in a loud environment (football audience, as it seems to be targeted).

... but who knows. Perhaps the whole series of ads will come together in the end. We'll see.

I'm just saying that if they're trying to market to tech savvy people, then they've already lost.

Why? Microsoft's biggest pool of potential customers are the IT departments and people of medium and small businesses that are still running XP or 2000.

Microsoft isn't about selling laptops and ipods to kids who can get a hold of their parents credit cards, so their commercials aren't going to be the same.

They got tech savvy people's attention. You cannot base the response from tech savvy people and say that got people talking about it. They got people who have already made their minds up on Vista talking about, but those people don't matter. It is average users who matter.

I have seen the ad run in my market about a dozen times now (that's one station, so I imagine it has ran on others as well). Yet no one that I have talked to that are non-savvy people have seen it. Or if they have, they didn't notice it. But they remember those Apple ads though. Simple and funny. A pure white background without anything extra going on to distract the viewer.

I agree with your later point about Mojave being more apt for tv, but I still hold a little bit of faith for my original argument.

MS couldn't go with a straight up Apple style ad because they would have been labeled as copying and unoriginal, two negatives they would want to stay away from. For the average consumer knowing both figures in the commercial is helpful and will bridge the gap for most people.

I'm not saying this ad was end all be all, but you can expect to see a huge leap with their next one. Once again, I'm not disagreeing with you completely because I agree at some point, I'm just saying giving the general public a little more credit.

Why? Microsoft's biggest pool of potential customers are the IT departments and people of medium and small businesses that are still running XP or 2000.

Microsoft isn't about selling laptops and ipods to kids who can get a hold of their parents credit cards, so their commercials aren't going to be the same.

Microsoft decided to start doing ads to combat Apple's ads. Microsoft's marketing head stated as much. So these ads are in fact not aimed at IT departments. Why would they be? People in IT Departments aren't going to switch to an operating system based on an ad, but clearly (as evident from Apple's steadily increasing marketshare and constantly out doing itself every quarter) Apple ads do work for average consumers.

But if an IT Department actually decides to switch to Vista because of an ad that features Seinfeld and Gates trying on shoes, that company has some serious issues.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!