Cheque vs Check


Cheque vs. Check  

293 members have voted

  1. 1. Which one?

    • Check
      87
    • Cheque
      206


Recommended Posts

I use check when referring to little boxes on forms.

I use cheque when offering or requesting money.

And if anyone bitches about another stupid poll, my excuse is: 8 million by Oct 1st 2008 & Win! So **** you. :p

Much anger in young padawan.

You know, it irks me how people rag on the US for spelling words differently, claiming it's because American's are illiterate and so on.

GTFO

Look at how language evolved, specifically English. We took words from other languages, missused them, misspselled them and call it "English". We have no right to look down upon anyone doing the same to us.

And if American spellings are shorter - is it not a more advanced language? Would it not be arguable that it's more efficient?

check > cheque

Cheque is just lame and looks uppity.

May appear that way to you, however "cheque" is proper english.

If someone used "check", or "checking" when referring to a cheque book or chequing account I would think of them as uneducated.

Sorry.

It's check if you're in the US, cheque if your in the UK.

Case closed...

ps. Favorites and favourites is another example of English US <> English UK.

Tbh I really consider the US version to be the thicker/dumber version of the 2.

The UK language is the proper English language. The US one is just writing what something sounds like.

(No offence to you yanks)

It's check if you're in the US, cheque if your in the UK.

Case closed...

ps. Favorites and favourites is another example of English US <> English UK.

Tbh I really consider the US version to be the thicker/dumber version of the 2.

The UK language is the proper English language. The US one is just writing what something sounds like.

(No offence to you yanks)

haha, hi five this man :D

It's check if you're in the US, cheque if your in the UK.

Case closed...

ps. Favorites and favourites is another example of English US <> English UK.

Tbh I really consider the US version to be the thicker/dumber version of the 2.

The UK language is the proper English language. The US one is just writing what something sounds like.

(No offence to you yanks)

You do realize it's different due to the historical fact that America wanted to change as much as they could after they declared independence from Britain including the language. So even last names changed from Smyth to Smith, or similar.

Say "ab" like "abdominals".

Say "out" like "I'm going out for dinner".

Say "ab" and "out" quickly together. That is how Canadians say "about". It's probably consistent with Californians.

Some American regional dialects pronounce a "W" sound in about (or the word "doubt"). I'm not sure why but there you have it. It comes off as "ab-OW-t". I doubt they say that they are going "OW-t" for dinner (but maybe they do).

Say "ab" and "out" quickly together. That is how Canadians say "about". It's probably consistent with Californians.

Not at all actually, the Canadian pronunciation of the 'ou' dipthong is more consistent with Scots or Hiberno English. (At least, in the stereotypical 'Canadian' accent.) But that's a different thread.

Hey guys, cheque out this thread!!!

..... Wait, I used that wrong didn't I? :p

Czech :laugh:

Smart alecks. :laugh:

I do admit getting a bit annoyed anytime someone up here uses American spelling for words. ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!