Cheque vs Check


Cheque vs. Check  

293 members have voted

  1. 1. Which one?

    • Check
      87
    • Cheque
      206


Recommended Posts

Not at all actually, the Canadian pronunciation of the 'ou' dipthong is more consistent with Scots or Hiberno English. (At least, in the stereotypical 'Canadian' accent.) But that's a different thread.

Well, I don't know those Canadians. I don't think Joel does either. People in Ontario typically sound pretty similar to Californians which is why our news people (i.e. John Roberts) can transition to the United States so easily.

You do realize it's different due to the historical fact that America wanted to change as much as they could after they declared independence from Britain including the language. So even last names changed from Smyth to Smith, or similar.

+1 .. it's the truth

Well, I don't know those Canadians. I don't think Joel does either. People in Ontario typically sound pretty similar to Californians which is why our news people (i.e. John Roberts) can transition to the United States so easily.

Canadian Raising is actually prominent across the entire country. I've noticed that Canadians themselves tend to be the last ones to notice it, while Americans or Brits tend to pick it up faster. I'd imagine that's due to exposure to so much American media, somehow we become oversaturated to the point that we don't even notice that we *don't* speak the same way.

Wiki Article on Canadian Raising

I was proof reading a friend's e-mail (because he admits he is bad at spelling and grammar), and he used "check" as in, a piece of paper that denotes money. I'm from NYC, USA and I always thought that a "check" was a mark on a piece of paper, say a survey form. And a "cheque" was what you got from your bank.

I Wikipediaed it, and apparently, in the USA, it's ok to use "check" as in a bank note.

When did this happen? I'm from the USA. No one told me! :laugh:

I'm just curious as to whether I am the only guy from the USA who uses "cheque" and what other countries say.

I wonder if the pronunciation of the word changed into the way people spell it.

And if anyone bitches about another stupid poll, my excuse is: 8 million by Oct 1st 2008 & Win! So **** you. :p

EDIT: Oh Christ. I forgot to add the poll. And I can't edit it from here. :blush:

To answer your question, yes it is possible that you are the only guy in the USA that uses the British spelling, but I doubt it. I'm sure they are other Americans that do not use the correct American spelling.

I looked ?Cheque? up in the Webster's Dictionary and its say that ?Cheque? is the British variation of the word ?Check.? So then I looked up ?Check? and it defines it as a ?written order to a bank to pay money.?

Also, every mail order bank check business I know of uses the American spelling. For example, visit http://secure.checksinthemail.com/ and http://www.styleschecks.com/home.aspx

I think it's important to note that the users of the British spelling are simultaneously:

1) Looking down on the American spelling as if it's a simplification we used so it wouldn't be so hard for us Americans to remember english

2) Complaining that if it was spelled 'check' it would be too difficult to tell which meaning it carries.

I'm not sure if I should take the insult from (1) or the unintended compliment from (2), where the British folk pretty much say Americans have a solid grasp of context and do better with comprehension than they do.

Hmm...thanks!

P.S. We're all just speaking yet another language's spin-off, changing and mingling and mixing as people spread across the globe. It seems the only difference is that the British crossed a few feet of water and their language changed completely, while the Americans crossed an ocean and still remembered how to speak. :)

I think it's important to note that the users of the British spelling are simultaneously:

1) Looking down on the American spelling as if it's a simplification we used so it wouldn't be so hard for us Americans to remember english

2) Complaining that if it was spelled 'check' it would be too difficult to tell which meaning it carries.

I'm not sure if I should take the insult from (1) or the unintended compliment from (2), where the British folk pretty much say Americans have a solid grasp of context and do better with comprehension than they do.

Hmm...thanks!

Or, spelling it the way that they have been taught just like the Americans and don't really care either way.

aboot this arguement:

I write a cheque...

but i put a big check mark on the cheque eh?

from Canada here too.. but i love the stereotypical accent..not a lot of people in Canada actually have that accent. :p

Very true, but in my estimation it seems about 95% of Americans have never been to Canada, I've been to Southern States where people don't even know where Canada is.

May appear that way to you, however "cheque" is proper english.

If someone used "check", or "checking" when referring to a cheque book or chequing account I would think of them as uneducated.

Sorry.

I would find a person who doesn't understand that different parts of the world have different dialects UNEDUCATED! Just because some countries speak "English" does not mean they are exactly alike. Go down to Mexico and Central America. There's all different forms of Spanish. There's even different dialects in the UK! I'm sure Northern UK says some things different then the Southern UKers.

A fragment sentence.

Never in my life have I ever heard an American say, "I'm off on holiday!" (Unless they were pretending with a British accent)

Is it totally improper to say, "I'm going on vacation!"

NO. They both work. Neither are wrong. Whoa, wait is that pronounced NEEEETHER or NIIIIIITHER hmm?

Welcome to the year 2008.

I would find a person who doesn't understand that different parts of the world have different dialects UNEDUCATED! Just because some countries speak "English" does not mean they are exactly alike. Go down to Mexico and Central America. There's all different forms of Spanish. There's even different dialects in the UK! I'm sure Northern UK says some things different then the Southern UKers.

A fragment sentence.

Never in my life have I ever heard an American say, "I'm off on holiday!" (Unless they were pretending with a British accent)

Is it totally improper to say, "I'm going on vacation!"

NO. They both work. Neither are wrong. Whoa, wait is that pronounced NEEEETHER or NIIIIIITHER hmm?

Welcome to the year 2008.

Thank you!

  • 2 years later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But building your own.. what? You can't build anything like the Steam Machine yourself. Even trying to get close costs a good deal more. Even just the CPU cooler in their price comparison is as big as the entire Steam Machine. If you want a regular gaming PC, then by all means, build that. If you want a a small console-like PC for the living room that is good for gaming, I'm not sure what else is a better deal. In the GN review, they only mentioned a small form factor Dell, which is like twice the size and hundreds of dollars more expensive.
    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
    • Ubuntu Livepatch arrives on Arm64 to eliminate system reboots for kernel updates by Paul Hill Canonical has just announced that its Livepatch service now supports computers with Arm64 processors. For those who are not familiar, Livepatch allows users to apply important kernel updates without any service interruption or rebooting. While home users will benefit from this, it’s even more important for critical machines that absolutely should not be going offline at all. The feature is available as part of Ubuntu Core 26 for Arm64 and Ubuntu Core 20 and onwards for AMD64. According to Canonical, this will improve the security of systems that aren’t security-maintained daily or weekly, and it helps organizations work towards Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance. If you are familiar with Ubuntu, you probably know that most packages can be updated without having to restart the system. There is one big exception to this, and that’s the kernel; it typically requires you to reload the system to boot into the new kernel. With Livepatch, Canonical has done something so that you don’t need to restart to begin using the new kernel. Aside from Ubuntu Core 26, users with Arm64 chips running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS can also use Livepatch. If you want to learn more about Livepatch, check out its product page. There, you can also find a button to join Ubuntu Pro (it’s free for several home devices) so that you can enable Livepatch. By linking your computer to Ubuntu Pro, you will also extend the life of your Ubuntu install from five years to ten years. If you are running Ubuntu, let us know in the comments if you have been looking forward to this feature on your ARM-based computer. If you’ve had a compatible AMD64 machine for a while and never used this feature, let us know why in the comments!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!