OpenGL 3 & DirectX 11: The War Is Over


Recommended Posts

(For images, please see the web site....)

Introduction

Given the prevalence of DirectX nowadays, we tend to forget that 10 years ago an all-out war was being waged between Microsoft and Silicon Graphics in the field of 3D APIs. The two companies were both trying to win over developers, with Microsoft using its financial muscle and SGI relying on its experience and its reputation in the field of real-time 3D. In this modern David-versus-Goliath battle, the “little guy” won a precious ally in one of the most famous game developers–-Mr. John Carmack. In part due to the success of the Quake engine, solid support for OpenGL opengl became important enough to motivate makers of 3D cards to provide complete drivers. In fact, it gave 3dfx one of its early advantages and knocked ATI to the back of the pack as it struggled with its OpenGL support.

Meanwhile, Microsoft was starting from scratch, and the learning curve was steep. So, for several years, Direct3D direct3d ’s capabilities were beyond the curve, with an interface that many programmers found a lot more confusing than OpenGL’s. But nobody can accuse Microsoft of being easily discouraged. With each new version of Direct3D, it gradually began to catch up with OpenGL. The engineers in Redmond worked very hard to bring performance up to its rival API’s level.

A turning point was reached with DirectX 8, released in 2001. For the first time, Microsoft’s API did more than just copy from SGI. It actually introduced innovations of its own like support for vertex and pixel shaders. SGI, whose main source of revenue was the sale of expensive 3D workstations, was in a bad position, having failed to foresee that the explosion of 3D cards for gamers would prompt ATI and Nvidia nvidia to move into the professional market with prices so low (due to economies of scale) that SGI couldn’t keep up. OpenGL’s development was also handicapped by bitter disputes among its proponents. Since the ARB—the group in charge of ratifying the API’s development—included many different, competing companies, it was hard to reach agreement on the features to be added to the API. Instead, each company promoted its own agenda. Conversely, Microsoft was working solely with ATI and Nvidia, using its weight to cast a deciding vote if there was disagreement.

With DirectX 9, Microsoft managed to strike a decisive victory, imposing its API on developers. Only John Carmack and those who insisted on portability remained faithful to OpenGL. But their ranks dwindled. And yet a reversal of fortunes was still possible. It had happened with Web browsers, after all. Even when a company has maneuvered itself into a near monopoly, if it rests on its laurels, it’s not all that rare for a competitor to rise from his ashes. So when the Khronos group took over OpenGL two years ago, many hopes were rekindled with all eyes on the upcoming SIGGRAPH conference that year.

Last month, Khronos was to have announced OpenGL 3, a major revision of the API that’s supposed to catch up with Microsoft, which was also scheduled to launch its next-gen DirectX 11 API. But things didn’t really go as planned.

<snipped - see source for rest of article>

Source: tom's hardware

Edited by PureLegend
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/670942-opengl-3-directx-11-the-war-is-over/
Share on other sites

Until Microsoft releases their method on other platforms (or at least opens it up so it can be freely implemented by others who want to port it), it is OpenGL for me.

which they wont ..... they rather customer keep buying windows for DirectX upgrades/update ... for short windows exclusive and will stay that way .

what we call it ? oh yes locking in customers

which they wont ..... they rather customer keep buying windows for DirectX upgrades/update ... for short windows exclusive and will stay that way .

what we call it ? oh yes locking in customers

I call it business.

It's a better read on Tom's Hardware. It's not just a wall of text, and there are pretty pictures to help visualise wtf they're talking about.

That is why I posted the following at the top of the story:

(For images, please see the web site....)

Of course, you completely failed to see that; typical!

It's not about how pretty it is or how convenient it is for you, it's about the ad-revenue you're taking away from the original source.

Funny, but it is standard practice in the Breaking News section to post the content with a link.

Most of the time, it is complete text content, so no need singling out this specific post, or the thread starter. A discussion of this sort would need to be with Neowin Staff who set the rules and accepted practices.

That is why I posted the following at the top of the story:

(For images, please see the web site....)

Of course, you completely failed to see that; typical!

I didn't fail to see it at all. Just making a statement.

I my opinion, you'd have been better off just posting the title, a small portion of the text, and a link.

Copy and pasting from 10 pages seems like a bit of a waist of time.

But honestly, thanks for sharing, it was an interesting read.

Funny, but it is standard practice in the Breaking News section to post the content with a link.

Most of the time, it is complete text content, so no need singling out this specific post, or the thread starter. A discussion of this sort would need to be with Neowin Staff who set the rules and accepted practices.

Actually, the standard practice is to post a snippet along with a link to the full article.

That's because most of the time the complete text is only a paragraph or two. An article of this length should not be copied. Actually there is no singling out here. It doesn't matter who posts it but an article of this length should not be copied in it's entirety. If you don't see the problem with doing that, then I'm sorry I can't help you.

As for Neowin Staff, it's up to them to do their jobs. All I can do is click the happy little 'report' button. Or maybe bring this to the attention of those who care... ;)

Actually, the standard practice is to post a snippet along with a link to the full article.
A check of the 10 next "Breaking News" threads, not counting this full cut/paste has the results of:

Full Text: 4

Partial Snip: 3

Spam for software: 1

Site Blocked for me at work: 1 (gee, a full text would be helpful in that case)

Youtube link (why is that news?) but also blocked: 1 (And that, apparently is in French, anyhow, judging by the comments posted)

Seems that there is no real "standard", except to allow both full and snippet type of Breaking News. ;)

That's because most of the time the complete text is only a paragraph or two. An article of this length should not be copied. Actually there is no singling out here. It doesn't matter who posts it but an article of this length should not be copied in it's entirety. If you don't see the problem with doing that, then I'm sorry I can't help you.
Agreed that the article was overly lengthy. However, some people read Neowin News at work during lunch and breaks. In cases where the destination site is blocked, a full-text is an advantage.
As for Neowin Staff, it's up to them to do their jobs. All I can do is click the happy little 'report' button. Or maybe bring this to the attention of those who care... ;)
Report away. You want the staff do to their jobs? Then stop whining about it in the threads and use the report and let them decide. :whistle:
A check of the 10 next "Breaking News" threads, not counting this full cut/paste has the results of:

Full Text: 4

Partial Snip: 3

Spam for software: 1

Site Blocked for me at work: 1 (gee, a full text would be helpful in that case)

Youtube link (why is that news?) but also blocked: 1 (And that, apparently is in French, anyhow, judging by the comments posted)

Seems that there is no real "standard", except to allow both full and snippet type of Breaking News. ;)

And does that make it okay? Certainly not. Just because you see it happening a lot does not make it acceptable, no, it's actually just indicative of careless staff. ;)

Agreed that the article was overly lengthy. However, some people read Neowin News at work during lunch and breaks. In cases where the destination site is blocked, a full-text is an advantage.

In that case, they can either: 1) Choose to abide by their employer's decisions and actually do what they're paid to do and wait till they get home to read the article or 2) Read the snippet and still participate in the discussion just fine

The bottom line is, full-text is a disadvantage to the people who work hard on putting these articles together to generate ad revenue for their site. Are you an advocate of piracy? This really isn't that far off it.

Report away. You want the staff do to their jobs? Then stop whining about it in the threads and use the report and let them decide. :whistle:

Haha, I'm sorry, but who's the one whining? :rolleyes:

---

Anyway, that's the last I'll discuss on this in this topic as it is offtopic. I'm sure you probably have a hard time realizing why this is an issue because either you don't really understand the implications or just don't care.

And does that make it okay? Certainly not. Just because you see it happening a lot does not make it acceptable, no, it's actually just indicative of careless staff. ;)
I said "standard practice", meaning it is common and accepted. You are now discussing if it is piracy and right. Nice bait-and-switch in a discussion. :p
Haha, I'm sorry, but who's the one whining? :rolleyes:
Who? You.
Umm... can we not copy and paste the full article here? :rolleyes:
It's not about how pretty it is or how convenient it is for you, it's about the ad-revenue you're taking away from the original source.
...

That's because most of the time the complete text is only a paragraph or two. An article of this length should not be copied. Actually there is no singling out here. It doesn't matter who posts it but an article of this length should not be copied in it's entirety. If you don't see the problem with doing that, then I'm sorry I can't help you.

...

hmm well the PC has little to do with gaming now anyway. developers are just going to use whatever API is used on consoles and then port to PC. so i would imagine developers will move to DX11 or 12 or whatever when the xbox 720 comes out. and thus if people want to play those newest games on PC they will have to have windows vista or later. by which time most people will.

hmm well the PC has little to do with gaming now anyway. developers are just going to use whatever API is used on consoles and then port to PC. so i would imagine developers will move to DX11 or 12 or whatever when the xbox 720 comes out. and thus if people want to play those newest games on PC they will have to have windows vista or later. by which time most people will.

The PC is still the largest gaming platform....

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Meta announces a major leadership change at WhatsApp by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta has announced a major leadership change at WhatsApp, with Will Cathcart stepping down after seven years of leading the world's largest messaging platform. CRED CEO and founder Kunal Shah will take over as the next global head of WhatsApp. CRED is an Indian fintech company focused on creditworthy consumers. As part of the transition, Meta is also making a minority investment in CRED through its Series H funding round. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Will Cathcart will remain at Meta and move into a new role focused on building new products from the ground up. Cathcart led WhatsApp during a major growth phase, helping the app reach more than 3 billion users worldwide. He also played a key role in expanding WhatsApp’s business offerings while keeping privacy and end-to-end encryption central to the product. Meta’s Chief Product Officer, Chris Cox, said Kunal Shah was selected after a search for a leader who understands WhatsApp’s global scale and future potential. In a leaked internal memo, Cox described Shah as a “serial founder” and one of India’s most respected entrepreneurs, adding that he brings “entrepreneurial energy” and a strong product mindset to the role. As part of the Series H funding round, CRED is raising ₹8,550 crore, or about $900 million, in a round led by Meta. The funding values CRED at ₹43,239 crore, or about $4.5 billion, on a post-money basis. It is important to note that this investment will not give Meta access to CRED customer information. Kunal posted the following on X regarding his new role at Meta: Although Kunal Shah will be stepping away from his operating role as CRED CEO, he will retain his personal shareholding in the company.
    • It wouldn't be hard for me to turn off my TV, if I had one. For one thing, I never scroll Instagram. The only reason I have an account is because Meta created one when it merged the account systems for its various services.
    • OpenAI's new GPT-5.5-Cyber tops Claude Mythos 5 in vulnerability benchmark by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI today announced a major expansion of Daybreak, a cybersecurity initiative designed to help defenders find, validate, and fix software vulnerabilities earlier in the development process. The availability of powerful AI models has definitely changed the cybersecurity landscape by making vulnerability discovery much faster. However, the bigger bottleneck for the industry is now patching those vulnerabilities. Impacted software teams need to validate the discovered issues, understand their impact, develop fixes, test them, and deploy patches. Back in March, OpenAI launched a preview of Codex Security, which uses agentic reasoning with automated validation to discover high-impact issues and actionable fixes specific to the codebase. Since then, it has scanned more than 30 million commits across over 30,000 codebases; more than 70,000 findings were marked as fixed by human reviewers, while over 500,000 findings were automatically determined to be fixed. Now, OpenAI is releasing an updated Codex Security plugin that can run deep scans, review recent code changes, generate security reports, trace attack paths, validate findings, and create codebase-specific patches for human review. It can also triage findings from existing scanners, advisories, bug bounty reports, and ticketing systems. OpenAI says the plugin can export results to vulnerability management systems and integrate with workflows using SARIF files, CodeQL queries, the Codex CLI, and the Codex app. Back in May, OpenAI announced the preview of GPT-5.5-Cyber, a new model built on top of the recently released GPT-5.5, designed for specialized cybersecurity work. Today, OpenAI launched the full version of GPT-5.5-Cyber through a limited release for verified defenders. On CyberGym, GPT-5.5-Cyber scored 85.6%, compared with 81.8% for GPT-5.5 and 83.8% for Claude Mythos 5. It also scored 39.5% on ExploitGym, compared with 25.95% for GPT-5.5, and 69.8% on SEC-bench Pro, compared with 63.1%. OpenAI also announced the new Daybreak Cyber Partner Program, which will allow security vendors and service providers to use GPT-5.5 with Trusted Access for Cyber in their products and services. Accenture, Akamai, Cisco, Cloudflare, CrowdStrike, IBM, Palo Alto Networks, Proofpoint, SentinelOne, Wiz, Zscaler, and others were listed as initial partners for this program. OpenAI is also launching Patch the Planet with Trail of Bits, HackerOne, Calif, researchers, and maintainers. More than 30 open-source projects have committed to participate, including cURL, Go, Python, Sigstore, and pyca/cryptography.
    • AMD confirms 26.6.2 FSR driver breaks on many Windows PCs by Sayan Sen Earlier today AMD released a major graphics driver update as it brings support for FSR 4.1 to Radeon RX 7000 series GPUs. The new update, version 26.6.2, also brings support for Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced and more. And while the driver technically supports Windows 10 version 21H2 and newer, the tech giant has confirmed that there is a major issue with the new driver on non-Windows 11 PCs as it fails to launch properly on such systems. The error message says, "The version of AMD Software that you have launched is not compatible with your currently installed AMD graphics driver." Therefore on the surface it looks like a compatibility problem. AMD has also confirmed that the device manager will display the yellow bang or yellow exclamation sign alongside your GPU under the Display adapters dropdown. Here is what the Radeon team's official advisory recommends to affected users: "Users Running Windows 10 and AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 May Encounter Yellow Bang in Device Manager Affecting AMD Radeon RX Series Graphics ... Our Engineers are currently investigating this issue and will provide a fix once it is available. Affected users may revert to AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.1 as a temporary workaround." As such you should revert back to the previous 26.6.1 driver which was released earlier this month. In case you were looking to play Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced and DOOM: The Dark Ages | Revelations you will probably have to wait a while if you want the driver to support those games officially. You can find the support article here on Microsoft's website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      208
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      98
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!