OpenGL 3 & DirectX 11: The War Is Over


Recommended Posts

(For images, please see the web site....)

Introduction

Given the prevalence of DirectX nowadays, we tend to forget that 10 years ago an all-out war was being waged between Microsoft and Silicon Graphics in the field of 3D APIs. The two companies were both trying to win over developers, with Microsoft using its financial muscle and SGI relying on its experience and its reputation in the field of real-time 3D. In this modern David-versus-Goliath battle, the “little guy” won a precious ally in one of the most famous game developers–-Mr. John Carmack. In part due to the success of the Quake engine, solid support for OpenGL opengl became important enough to motivate makers of 3D cards to provide complete drivers. In fact, it gave 3dfx one of its early advantages and knocked ATI to the back of the pack as it struggled with its OpenGL support.

Meanwhile, Microsoft was starting from scratch, and the learning curve was steep. So, for several years, Direct3D direct3d ’s capabilities were beyond the curve, with an interface that many programmers found a lot more confusing than OpenGL’s. But nobody can accuse Microsoft of being easily discouraged. With each new version of Direct3D, it gradually began to catch up with OpenGL. The engineers in Redmond worked very hard to bring performance up to its rival API’s level.

A turning point was reached with DirectX 8, released in 2001. For the first time, Microsoft’s API did more than just copy from SGI. It actually introduced innovations of its own like support for vertex and pixel shaders. SGI, whose main source of revenue was the sale of expensive 3D workstations, was in a bad position, having failed to foresee that the explosion of 3D cards for gamers would prompt ATI and Nvidia nvidia to move into the professional market with prices so low (due to economies of scale) that SGI couldn’t keep up. OpenGL’s development was also handicapped by bitter disputes among its proponents. Since the ARB—the group in charge of ratifying the API’s development—included many different, competing companies, it was hard to reach agreement on the features to be added to the API. Instead, each company promoted its own agenda. Conversely, Microsoft was working solely with ATI and Nvidia, using its weight to cast a deciding vote if there was disagreement.

With DirectX 9, Microsoft managed to strike a decisive victory, imposing its API on developers. Only John Carmack and those who insisted on portability remained faithful to OpenGL. But their ranks dwindled. And yet a reversal of fortunes was still possible. It had happened with Web browsers, after all. Even when a company has maneuvered itself into a near monopoly, if it rests on its laurels, it’s not all that rare for a competitor to rise from his ashes. So when the Khronos group took over OpenGL two years ago, many hopes were rekindled with all eyes on the upcoming SIGGRAPH conference that year.

Last month, Khronos was to have announced OpenGL 3, a major revision of the API that’s supposed to catch up with Microsoft, which was also scheduled to launch its next-gen DirectX 11 API. But things didn’t really go as planned.

<snipped - see source for rest of article>

Source: tom's hardware

Edited by PureLegend
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/670942-opengl-3-directx-11-the-war-is-over/
Share on other sites

Until Microsoft releases their method on other platforms (or at least opens it up so it can be freely implemented by others who want to port it), it is OpenGL for me.

which they wont ..... they rather customer keep buying windows for DirectX upgrades/update ... for short windows exclusive and will stay that way .

what we call it ? oh yes locking in customers

which they wont ..... they rather customer keep buying windows for DirectX upgrades/update ... for short windows exclusive and will stay that way .

what we call it ? oh yes locking in customers

I call it business.

It's a better read on Tom's Hardware. It's not just a wall of text, and there are pretty pictures to help visualise wtf they're talking about.

That is why I posted the following at the top of the story:

(For images, please see the web site....)

Of course, you completely failed to see that; typical!

It's not about how pretty it is or how convenient it is for you, it's about the ad-revenue you're taking away from the original source.

Funny, but it is standard practice in the Breaking News section to post the content with a link.

Most of the time, it is complete text content, so no need singling out this specific post, or the thread starter. A discussion of this sort would need to be with Neowin Staff who set the rules and accepted practices.

That is why I posted the following at the top of the story:

(For images, please see the web site....)

Of course, you completely failed to see that; typical!

I didn't fail to see it at all. Just making a statement.

I my opinion, you'd have been better off just posting the title, a small portion of the text, and a link.

Copy and pasting from 10 pages seems like a bit of a waist of time.

But honestly, thanks for sharing, it was an interesting read.

Funny, but it is standard practice in the Breaking News section to post the content with a link.

Most of the time, it is complete text content, so no need singling out this specific post, or the thread starter. A discussion of this sort would need to be with Neowin Staff who set the rules and accepted practices.

Actually, the standard practice is to post a snippet along with a link to the full article.

That's because most of the time the complete text is only a paragraph or two. An article of this length should not be copied. Actually there is no singling out here. It doesn't matter who posts it but an article of this length should not be copied in it's entirety. If you don't see the problem with doing that, then I'm sorry I can't help you.

As for Neowin Staff, it's up to them to do their jobs. All I can do is click the happy little 'report' button. Or maybe bring this to the attention of those who care... ;)

Actually, the standard practice is to post a snippet along with a link to the full article.
A check of the 10 next "Breaking News" threads, not counting this full cut/paste has the results of:

Full Text: 4

Partial Snip: 3

Spam for software: 1

Site Blocked for me at work: 1 (gee, a full text would be helpful in that case)

Youtube link (why is that news?) but also blocked: 1 (And that, apparently is in French, anyhow, judging by the comments posted)

Seems that there is no real "standard", except to allow both full and snippet type of Breaking News. ;)

That's because most of the time the complete text is only a paragraph or two. An article of this length should not be copied. Actually there is no singling out here. It doesn't matter who posts it but an article of this length should not be copied in it's entirety. If you don't see the problem with doing that, then I'm sorry I can't help you.
Agreed that the article was overly lengthy. However, some people read Neowin News at work during lunch and breaks. In cases where the destination site is blocked, a full-text is an advantage.
As for Neowin Staff, it's up to them to do their jobs. All I can do is click the happy little 'report' button. Or maybe bring this to the attention of those who care... ;)
Report away. You want the staff do to their jobs? Then stop whining about it in the threads and use the report and let them decide. :whistle:
A check of the 10 next "Breaking News" threads, not counting this full cut/paste has the results of:

Full Text: 4

Partial Snip: 3

Spam for software: 1

Site Blocked for me at work: 1 (gee, a full text would be helpful in that case)

Youtube link (why is that news?) but also blocked: 1 (And that, apparently is in French, anyhow, judging by the comments posted)

Seems that there is no real "standard", except to allow both full and snippet type of Breaking News. ;)

And does that make it okay? Certainly not. Just because you see it happening a lot does not make it acceptable, no, it's actually just indicative of careless staff. ;)

Agreed that the article was overly lengthy. However, some people read Neowin News at work during lunch and breaks. In cases where the destination site is blocked, a full-text is an advantage.

In that case, they can either: 1) Choose to abide by their employer's decisions and actually do what they're paid to do and wait till they get home to read the article or 2) Read the snippet and still participate in the discussion just fine

The bottom line is, full-text is a disadvantage to the people who work hard on putting these articles together to generate ad revenue for their site. Are you an advocate of piracy? This really isn't that far off it.

Report away. You want the staff do to their jobs? Then stop whining about it in the threads and use the report and let them decide. :whistle:

Haha, I'm sorry, but who's the one whining? :rolleyes:

---

Anyway, that's the last I'll discuss on this in this topic as it is offtopic. I'm sure you probably have a hard time realizing why this is an issue because either you don't really understand the implications or just don't care.

And does that make it okay? Certainly not. Just because you see it happening a lot does not make it acceptable, no, it's actually just indicative of careless staff. ;)
I said "standard practice", meaning it is common and accepted. You are now discussing if it is piracy and right. Nice bait-and-switch in a discussion. :p
Haha, I'm sorry, but who's the one whining? :rolleyes:
Who? You.
Umm... can we not copy and paste the full article here? :rolleyes:
It's not about how pretty it is or how convenient it is for you, it's about the ad-revenue you're taking away from the original source.
...

That's because most of the time the complete text is only a paragraph or two. An article of this length should not be copied. Actually there is no singling out here. It doesn't matter who posts it but an article of this length should not be copied in it's entirety. If you don't see the problem with doing that, then I'm sorry I can't help you.

...

hmm well the PC has little to do with gaming now anyway. developers are just going to use whatever API is used on consoles and then port to PC. so i would imagine developers will move to DX11 or 12 or whatever when the xbox 720 comes out. and thus if people want to play those newest games on PC they will have to have windows vista or later. by which time most people will.

hmm well the PC has little to do with gaming now anyway. developers are just going to use whatever API is used on consoles and then port to PC. so i would imagine developers will move to DX11 or 12 or whatever when the xbox 720 comes out. and thus if people want to play those newest games on PC they will have to have windows vista or later. by which time most people will.

The PC is still the largest gaming platform....

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
    • 1TB Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSDs are now selling at great prices by Fiza Ali Amazon is now offering the 1TB variant of Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSD at great prices with limited-time 38% and 39% discounts, respectively, so you may want to check them out if you have been looking to upgrade your storage solution. The Samsung T9 connects via a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) interface and delivers sequential read speeds of up to 2,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,950MB/s, making it suitable for transferring large files, backing up data, and handling high-resolution media content. When it comes to the security features, the SSD includes AES 256-bit hardware encryption to help protect sensitive data. Designed for portability, the drive is reportedly resistant to drops from heights of up to 3 metres. Furthermore, it operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 60°C and can be stored at temperatures between -40°C and 85°C. Samsung Magician Software is included for drive management, firmware updates, performance optimisation, and health monitoring. Finally, the T9 is certified to multiple international standards, including CE, FCC, UL, UKCA, and RoHS 2 compliance, and is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 1TB Samsung T9 SSD: $179.99 (Amazon US) - 38% off The Samsung 9100 PRO uses the M.2 2280 form factor and connects through a PCIe 5.0 x4 interface with NVMe 2.0 support. Built with Samsung V-NAND TLC flash memory, an in-house controller, and 1GB of low-power DDR4X cache memory, the 9100 PRO is engineered for high-performance computing and gaming workloads. Furthermore, the SSD delivers sequential read speeds of up to 14,700MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 13,300MB/s. Random performance is rated at up to 1,850,000 IOPS for reads and up to 2,600,000 IOPS for writes, depending on system hardware and configuration. The drive supports TRIM, S.M.A.R.T monitoring, automatic garbage collection, and device sleep mode to help maintain performance and efficiency over time. In terms of security features, it includes AES 256-bit encryption, TCG Opal support, and IEEE 1667 compliance. The 9100 PRO operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 70°C, is rated for 1.5 million hours MTBF, and can reportedly withstand shocks of up to 1,500G for 0.5 milliseconds. Finally, Samsung Magician Software is also included for firmware updates, performance monitoring, drive management, and optimisation. 1TB Samsung 9100 PRO SSD: $206.99 (Amazon US) - 39% off Alternatively, you can also check out other SSD deals here. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!