OpenGL 3 & DirectX 11: The War Is Over


Recommended Posts

(For images, please see the web site....)

Introduction

Given the prevalence of DirectX nowadays, we tend to forget that 10 years ago an all-out war was being waged between Microsoft and Silicon Graphics in the field of 3D APIs. The two companies were both trying to win over developers, with Microsoft using its financial muscle and SGI relying on its experience and its reputation in the field of real-time 3D. In this modern David-versus-Goliath battle, the “little guy” won a precious ally in one of the most famous game developers–-Mr. John Carmack. In part due to the success of the Quake engine, solid support for OpenGL opengl became important enough to motivate makers of 3D cards to provide complete drivers. In fact, it gave 3dfx one of its early advantages and knocked ATI to the back of the pack as it struggled with its OpenGL support.

Meanwhile, Microsoft was starting from scratch, and the learning curve was steep. So, for several years, Direct3D direct3d ’s capabilities were beyond the curve, with an interface that many programmers found a lot more confusing than OpenGL’s. But nobody can accuse Microsoft of being easily discouraged. With each new version of Direct3D, it gradually began to catch up with OpenGL. The engineers in Redmond worked very hard to bring performance up to its rival API’s level.

A turning point was reached with DirectX 8, released in 2001. For the first time, Microsoft’s API did more than just copy from SGI. It actually introduced innovations of its own like support for vertex and pixel shaders. SGI, whose main source of revenue was the sale of expensive 3D workstations, was in a bad position, having failed to foresee that the explosion of 3D cards for gamers would prompt ATI and Nvidia nvidia to move into the professional market with prices so low (due to economies of scale) that SGI couldn’t keep up. OpenGL’s development was also handicapped by bitter disputes among its proponents. Since the ARB—the group in charge of ratifying the API’s development—included many different, competing companies, it was hard to reach agreement on the features to be added to the API. Instead, each company promoted its own agenda. Conversely, Microsoft was working solely with ATI and Nvidia, using its weight to cast a deciding vote if there was disagreement.

With DirectX 9, Microsoft managed to strike a decisive victory, imposing its API on developers. Only John Carmack and those who insisted on portability remained faithful to OpenGL. But their ranks dwindled. And yet a reversal of fortunes was still possible. It had happened with Web browsers, after all. Even when a company has maneuvered itself into a near monopoly, if it rests on its laurels, it’s not all that rare for a competitor to rise from his ashes. So when the Khronos group took over OpenGL two years ago, many hopes were rekindled with all eyes on the upcoming SIGGRAPH conference that year.

Last month, Khronos was to have announced OpenGL 3, a major revision of the API that’s supposed to catch up with Microsoft, which was also scheduled to launch its next-gen DirectX 11 API. But things didn’t really go as planned.

<snipped - see source for rest of article>

Source: tom's hardware

Edited by PureLegend
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/670942-opengl-3-directx-11-the-war-is-over/
Share on other sites

Until Microsoft releases their method on other platforms (or at least opens it up so it can be freely implemented by others who want to port it), it is OpenGL for me.

which they wont ..... they rather customer keep buying windows for DirectX upgrades/update ... for short windows exclusive and will stay that way .

what we call it ? oh yes locking in customers

which they wont ..... they rather customer keep buying windows for DirectX upgrades/update ... for short windows exclusive and will stay that way .

what we call it ? oh yes locking in customers

I call it business.

It's a better read on Tom's Hardware. It's not just a wall of text, and there are pretty pictures to help visualise wtf they're talking about.

That is why I posted the following at the top of the story:

(For images, please see the web site....)

Of course, you completely failed to see that; typical!

It's not about how pretty it is or how convenient it is for you, it's about the ad-revenue you're taking away from the original source.

Funny, but it is standard practice in the Breaking News section to post the content with a link.

Most of the time, it is complete text content, so no need singling out this specific post, or the thread starter. A discussion of this sort would need to be with Neowin Staff who set the rules and accepted practices.

That is why I posted the following at the top of the story:

(For images, please see the web site....)

Of course, you completely failed to see that; typical!

I didn't fail to see it at all. Just making a statement.

I my opinion, you'd have been better off just posting the title, a small portion of the text, and a link.

Copy and pasting from 10 pages seems like a bit of a waist of time.

But honestly, thanks for sharing, it was an interesting read.

Funny, but it is standard practice in the Breaking News section to post the content with a link.

Most of the time, it is complete text content, so no need singling out this specific post, or the thread starter. A discussion of this sort would need to be with Neowin Staff who set the rules and accepted practices.

Actually, the standard practice is to post a snippet along with a link to the full article.

That's because most of the time the complete text is only a paragraph or two. An article of this length should not be copied. Actually there is no singling out here. It doesn't matter who posts it but an article of this length should not be copied in it's entirety. If you don't see the problem with doing that, then I'm sorry I can't help you.

As for Neowin Staff, it's up to them to do their jobs. All I can do is click the happy little 'report' button. Or maybe bring this to the attention of those who care... ;)

Actually, the standard practice is to post a snippet along with a link to the full article.
A check of the 10 next "Breaking News" threads, not counting this full cut/paste has the results of:

Full Text: 4

Partial Snip: 3

Spam for software: 1

Site Blocked for me at work: 1 (gee, a full text would be helpful in that case)

Youtube link (why is that news?) but also blocked: 1 (And that, apparently is in French, anyhow, judging by the comments posted)

Seems that there is no real "standard", except to allow both full and snippet type of Breaking News. ;)

That's because most of the time the complete text is only a paragraph or two. An article of this length should not be copied. Actually there is no singling out here. It doesn't matter who posts it but an article of this length should not be copied in it's entirety. If you don't see the problem with doing that, then I'm sorry I can't help you.
Agreed that the article was overly lengthy. However, some people read Neowin News at work during lunch and breaks. In cases where the destination site is blocked, a full-text is an advantage.
As for Neowin Staff, it's up to them to do their jobs. All I can do is click the happy little 'report' button. Or maybe bring this to the attention of those who care... ;)
Report away. You want the staff do to their jobs? Then stop whining about it in the threads and use the report and let them decide. :whistle:
A check of the 10 next "Breaking News" threads, not counting this full cut/paste has the results of:

Full Text: 4

Partial Snip: 3

Spam for software: 1

Site Blocked for me at work: 1 (gee, a full text would be helpful in that case)

Youtube link (why is that news?) but also blocked: 1 (And that, apparently is in French, anyhow, judging by the comments posted)

Seems that there is no real "standard", except to allow both full and snippet type of Breaking News. ;)

And does that make it okay? Certainly not. Just because you see it happening a lot does not make it acceptable, no, it's actually just indicative of careless staff. ;)

Agreed that the article was overly lengthy. However, some people read Neowin News at work during lunch and breaks. In cases where the destination site is blocked, a full-text is an advantage.

In that case, they can either: 1) Choose to abide by their employer's decisions and actually do what they're paid to do and wait till they get home to read the article or 2) Read the snippet and still participate in the discussion just fine

The bottom line is, full-text is a disadvantage to the people who work hard on putting these articles together to generate ad revenue for their site. Are you an advocate of piracy? This really isn't that far off it.

Report away. You want the staff do to their jobs? Then stop whining about it in the threads and use the report and let them decide. :whistle:

Haha, I'm sorry, but who's the one whining? :rolleyes:

---

Anyway, that's the last I'll discuss on this in this topic as it is offtopic. I'm sure you probably have a hard time realizing why this is an issue because either you don't really understand the implications or just don't care.

And does that make it okay? Certainly not. Just because you see it happening a lot does not make it acceptable, no, it's actually just indicative of careless staff. ;)
I said "standard practice", meaning it is common and accepted. You are now discussing if it is piracy and right. Nice bait-and-switch in a discussion. :p
Haha, I'm sorry, but who's the one whining? :rolleyes:
Who? You.
Umm... can we not copy and paste the full article here? :rolleyes:
It's not about how pretty it is or how convenient it is for you, it's about the ad-revenue you're taking away from the original source.
...

That's because most of the time the complete text is only a paragraph or two. An article of this length should not be copied. Actually there is no singling out here. It doesn't matter who posts it but an article of this length should not be copied in it's entirety. If you don't see the problem with doing that, then I'm sorry I can't help you.

...

hmm well the PC has little to do with gaming now anyway. developers are just going to use whatever API is used on consoles and then port to PC. so i would imagine developers will move to DX11 or 12 or whatever when the xbox 720 comes out. and thus if people want to play those newest games on PC they will have to have windows vista or later. by which time most people will.

hmm well the PC has little to do with gaming now anyway. developers are just going to use whatever API is used on consoles and then port to PC. so i would imagine developers will move to DX11 or 12 or whatever when the xbox 720 comes out. and thus if people want to play those newest games on PC they will have to have windows vista or later. by which time most people will.

The PC is still the largest gaming platform....

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!