Win7 features revealed: customizable UAC and integrated Accelerators


Recommended Posts

It looks very 'Window-ish' ... like Office 2007 theme gone overboard and split across the entire desktop. Like Vista, expect half of these features not to make it to the final product, and the other half to be dumbed downed. Giving users the power to disable UAC, what's the point? Aren't you suppose to be protecting those who are already too stupid to protect themselves?

The new UAC should be made as an update for Vista...

yes, the new UAC will be part of Vista SP2, for sure!

Anyway I will keep the UAC to the max security level, so I don't really need this update.

Edited by jamesVault
Giving users the power to disable UAC, what's the point? Aren't you suppose to be protecting those who are already too stupid to protect themselves?

I have to agree with this, this is going to make UAC basically obsolete because of the basic end user idiots who will switch it off due to it being "annoying"

I have to agree with this, this is going to make UAC basically obsolete because of the basic end user idiots who will switch it off due to it being "annoying"

They're not allowing you to turn it off, they'r allowing you to set it to silent mode without tweakUAC

I have to agree with this, this is going to make UAC basically obsolete because of the basic end user idiots who will switch it off due to it being "annoying"
And this is different from what happens right now how, exactly?

Ignorant users turn it off in Vista, and they will set it to silent mode in Win7. I see no difference.

It looks very 'Window-ish' ... like Office 2007 theme gone overboard and split across the entire desktop. Like Vista, expect half of these features not to make it to the final product, and the other half to be dumbed downed. Giving users the power to disable UAC, what's the point? Aren't you suppose to be protecting those who are already too stupid to protect themselves?

you need to not compare this to Vista. Vista was a whole reimiagnining of how many key components work, it was a rewrite of many core components and it had a lot of untested prototype technology in it durign the alpha and beta stages, and a lot of this was dropped because it made no sense or served no purpose.

7 is a regular windows update, some new features, updates to the ones that are there, some fixes here and there. bu they're not pushing in all the next gen protoypes then can to see what they can do. Now they're just building on the base the made with Vista.

ive been follow win7 news, but may have missed some stuff.

any word, or hints at Win FS?

yeah, it's dead and buried, the whole team was disabnded and the tech from it used in other projects in vista.

yeah, it's dead and buried, the whole team was disabnded and the tech from it used in other projects in vista.

so....NTFS for another 10 years?

or is there a chance they've been working on a new File system that hasnt been announced yet?

so....NTFS for another 10 years?

or is there a chance they've been working on a new File system that hasnt been announced yet?

There's nothing wrong with NTFS, but NTFS now isn't quite the same NTFS as back in NT.

and WinFS was not a filesystem, it was not a replacement for NTFS

There's nothing wrong with NTFS, but NTFS now isn't quite the same NTFS as back in NT.

and WinFS was not a filesystem, it was not a replacement for NTFS

i know, it was supposed to be a 'addon' kinda thing. to improve ntfs.

edit: just noticed the full thread about win 7 and WinFS :p

pfft accelerators in windows i can't imagine using that. i don't in ie anyway...

the UAC improvements look promising. the fact that users could turn off UC in vista was one of microsoft's biggest mistakes imo. only being able to put it in silent mode is much better.

what i don't get is how notifying without waiting for a response is useful at all. there's no point telling the user that a program has been elevated.

so....NTFS for another 10 years?

or is there a chance they've been working on a new File system that hasnt been announced yet?

Whata wrong with NTFS? What is it that you cannot do in NTFS today for which you will need a brand new filesystem for? True NTFS gets fragmented and is somewhat slow when accessing a number of small files but is it really so inconvenient that you are willing to put up with the issues of migrating to a different filesystem?

And why would you want to use WinFS for? Its not like just turning WinFS on will make all applications WinFS aware. Apart from adapting apps to take advantage of WinFS, tons of importers (I believe the components that would convert a regular file into WinFS items when they were copied into WinFS stores and the other way round when copied out were called importers) need to be written.

Its not like we cannot do WinFS-stuff like without WinFS. If it is just querying, Windows Search is more often than not enough. That and IFilter can aggregate data from various file types. If the app needs relational database capabilities, there are a lot of embedded/in-proc database systems out today. And schenatized XML can be used to shared schematized data between different applications. True, WinFS would have standardized a pretty broad set of the schemas and make them available to all WinFS-aware applications, but the world doesn't fall apart in its absense.

And a lot of WinFS bits are already available today ( http://perspectives.on10.net/blogs/jonudel...e-is-WinFS-now/ ). Its object/relational mapping system is ADO.NET Entity Framework in .NET Framework 3.5 SP1. Lot of the storage-related stuff like support for semi-structured, hierarchical data and data-stored-in-files-but-managed-by-sql-server is in SQL Server 2008 (including Express editions). That makes up most of WinFS' capabilities, with one notable exception of doing all this from Win32 apps themselves - a gap that will be filled by the next release of SQL Server:

In the next release we anticipate putting those two things together, the filesystem piece and the hierarchical ID piece, into a supported namespace. So you'll be able to type //machinename/sharename, up pops an Explorer window, drag and drop a file into it, go back to the database, type SELECT *, and suddenly a record appears.

The other thing that WinFS could do - syncing - is already out there with Microsoft Sync Framework and Live Mesk SDK is soon to be out as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers like me was eager to get. And that main feature that developers will love it`s the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
    • Wow, Microsoft IS cooking lately... This only shows that they COULD improve, they just chose not to for whatever reasons. That obsession with AI was destroying them from the inside out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!