Win7 features revealed: customizable UAC and integrated Accelerators


Recommended Posts

It looks very 'Window-ish' ... like Office 2007 theme gone overboard and split across the entire desktop. Like Vista, expect half of these features not to make it to the final product, and the other half to be dumbed downed. Giving users the power to disable UAC, what's the point? Aren't you suppose to be protecting those who are already too stupid to protect themselves?

The new UAC should be made as an update for Vista...

yes, the new UAC will be part of Vista SP2, for sure!

Anyway I will keep the UAC to the max security level, so I don't really need this update.

Edited by jamesVault
Giving users the power to disable UAC, what's the point? Aren't you suppose to be protecting those who are already too stupid to protect themselves?

I have to agree with this, this is going to make UAC basically obsolete because of the basic end user idiots who will switch it off due to it being "annoying"

I have to agree with this, this is going to make UAC basically obsolete because of the basic end user idiots who will switch it off due to it being "annoying"

They're not allowing you to turn it off, they'r allowing you to set it to silent mode without tweakUAC

I have to agree with this, this is going to make UAC basically obsolete because of the basic end user idiots who will switch it off due to it being "annoying"
And this is different from what happens right now how, exactly?

Ignorant users turn it off in Vista, and they will set it to silent mode in Win7. I see no difference.

It looks very 'Window-ish' ... like Office 2007 theme gone overboard and split across the entire desktop. Like Vista, expect half of these features not to make it to the final product, and the other half to be dumbed downed. Giving users the power to disable UAC, what's the point? Aren't you suppose to be protecting those who are already too stupid to protect themselves?

you need to not compare this to Vista. Vista was a whole reimiagnining of how many key components work, it was a rewrite of many core components and it had a lot of untested prototype technology in it durign the alpha and beta stages, and a lot of this was dropped because it made no sense or served no purpose.

7 is a regular windows update, some new features, updates to the ones that are there, some fixes here and there. bu they're not pushing in all the next gen protoypes then can to see what they can do. Now they're just building on the base the made with Vista.

ive been follow win7 news, but may have missed some stuff.

any word, or hints at Win FS?

yeah, it's dead and buried, the whole team was disabnded and the tech from it used in other projects in vista.

yeah, it's dead and buried, the whole team was disabnded and the tech from it used in other projects in vista.

so....NTFS for another 10 years?

or is there a chance they've been working on a new File system that hasnt been announced yet?

so....NTFS for another 10 years?

or is there a chance they've been working on a new File system that hasnt been announced yet?

There's nothing wrong with NTFS, but NTFS now isn't quite the same NTFS as back in NT.

and WinFS was not a filesystem, it was not a replacement for NTFS

There's nothing wrong with NTFS, but NTFS now isn't quite the same NTFS as back in NT.

and WinFS was not a filesystem, it was not a replacement for NTFS

i know, it was supposed to be a 'addon' kinda thing. to improve ntfs.

edit: just noticed the full thread about win 7 and WinFS :p

pfft accelerators in windows i can't imagine using that. i don't in ie anyway...

the UAC improvements look promising. the fact that users could turn off UC in vista was one of microsoft's biggest mistakes imo. only being able to put it in silent mode is much better.

what i don't get is how notifying without waiting for a response is useful at all. there's no point telling the user that a program has been elevated.

so....NTFS for another 10 years?

or is there a chance they've been working on a new File system that hasnt been announced yet?

Whata wrong with NTFS? What is it that you cannot do in NTFS today for which you will need a brand new filesystem for? True NTFS gets fragmented and is somewhat slow when accessing a number of small files but is it really so inconvenient that you are willing to put up with the issues of migrating to a different filesystem?

And why would you want to use WinFS for? Its not like just turning WinFS on will make all applications WinFS aware. Apart from adapting apps to take advantage of WinFS, tons of importers (I believe the components that would convert a regular file into WinFS items when they were copied into WinFS stores and the other way round when copied out were called importers) need to be written.

Its not like we cannot do WinFS-stuff like without WinFS. If it is just querying, Windows Search is more often than not enough. That and IFilter can aggregate data from various file types. If the app needs relational database capabilities, there are a lot of embedded/in-proc database systems out today. And schenatized XML can be used to shared schematized data between different applications. True, WinFS would have standardized a pretty broad set of the schemas and make them available to all WinFS-aware applications, but the world doesn't fall apart in its absense.

And a lot of WinFS bits are already available today ( http://perspectives.on10.net/blogs/jonudel...e-is-WinFS-now/ ). Its object/relational mapping system is ADO.NET Entity Framework in .NET Framework 3.5 SP1. Lot of the storage-related stuff like support for semi-structured, hierarchical data and data-stored-in-files-but-managed-by-sql-server is in SQL Server 2008 (including Express editions). That makes up most of WinFS' capabilities, with one notable exception of doing all this from Win32 apps themselves - a gap that will be filled by the next release of SQL Server:

In the next release we anticipate putting those two things together, the filesystem piece and the hierarchical ID piece, into a supported namespace. So you'll be able to type //machinename/sharename, up pops an Explorer window, drag and drop a file into it, go back to the database, type SELECT *, and suddenly a record appears.

The other thing that WinFS could do - syncing - is already out there with Microsoft Sync Framework and Live Mesk SDK is soon to be out as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!