Nokia set to unveil 'iPhone killer' in Nov


Recommended Posts

KOLKATA: Nokia has decided to launch its first touchscreen phone in India in the third week of November. The Finnish handset major will position the phone—Nokia 5800—under its music platform XpressMusic series and is likely to price it at sub-Rs 20,000. The model has just been unveiled globally and pegged by analysts as the iPhone killer.

Talking to ET here on Saturday, Nokia India managing director D Shivakumar said the company expects this phone will create the market for touchscreen devices in India. “What iPhone did was to bring the touch element to a multi-media converged device. Since we are already the leader in converged devices in India, Nokia 5800 will be a revolutionary launch from our stable,” he said.

Industry circles feel the price of Nokia 5800 will play a major role in garnering market share, since the recent spate of touchscreen phones like Apple’s iPhone and Samsung’s Omnia are priced more than Rs 30,000 in India. “Our touchscreen bet will have the latest features and will be packed with music,” said Mr Shivakumar.

The Nokia 5800 features a 3.2-megapixel camera with Carl Zeiss lens, a virtual QWERTY keyboard and offers all the music essentials—graphic equaliser, 8GB memory, supports all digital music formats with built-in surround sound stereo speakers.

After its launch, Nokia intends to study consumer behaviour towards touchscreen phones in India. “We have to study what are some of the key features which Indian consumers aspire for in a touch device. Based on this feedback, the company will decide on building a portfolio of touchscreen devices in India,” said Mr Shivakumar.

This apart, Nokia is also planning to bundle exclusive content featuring its brand ambassador Shah Rukh Khan for handsets sold in India. It has recently bundled the full length ‘Om Shanti Om’ movie in Nokia N96. It will look at bundling video clips and music of Shah Rukh Khan movies in the handsets.

Shah Rukh Khan said: “I am looking forward to collaborating with Nokia for such possibilities in my personal capacity and through my production house Red Chillies Entertainment.”

Source

I've always found the S60 and S90 Series Nokias to be terribly *slow* .. like f*kin SLOW :no:

guessing you have'nt used a s60 devices lately? (btw. s90 isn't used anymore)

They are lightning fast :D

i like the design. looks pretty good actually. =)

no panning/sliding though. some german tech site had a first hands on and they were not too pleased but hey, this is the first try and they definately will bring out some pro-devices featuring touchscreen.

competition ftw! =)

Statements like that will always leave egg on the face of the manufacturer releasing the hardware.

I wanted an iPhone but was put off by O2 (in the UK) and their crappy tariffs so went for a HTC Diamond, which even if I say so myself, pushed the iPhone out of sight in my opinion :)

Eh, everyone is saying that they have an iPhone killer, but none of them are living up the the hype of it. Its just a phone + touchscreen + apple logo. It's the logo that brings the hype, its like every new product that comes out from them has innovation. Wow touch screen mp4 player, not like archos had it before with tons more features. wow phone with toushcreen, not like imate, htc and the other loads of companies had it before... I like everyone else want's an iPhone, but in Kuwait, they're very overpriced, when the next shipment of 3Gs arrive in Kuwait my dad is getting one though.

I've said it once, and I'll say it again: if you're trying to kill another product, you're going to fail. What you do when you're aiming at another product, is you're copying its features. Remember: good artists copy, great artists steal. That can in fact be applied here: when you copy, it's like playing catch up. When you steal, you have a solid idea of what you want. That idea develops beyond what the competition offers.

Apple stole the GUI for computers from Xerox. It's simply fact. But what most people miss is that in stealing it, they added their own ideas. Same thing with the iPhone: They blatantly stole the idea of a smartphone from companies like RIM and HTC, even Microsoft who make the software on some of the phones. But what they did was different: they used the other smartphones as a groundwork for the iPhone. It feels more logical: you flick to scroll, you tap to select, you pinch outward to expand/grow, and pinch inward to shrink. No buttons to fiddle around with, just a bit of logic.

The only way to kill the iPhone is to go above and beyond what it offers. Use flick to scroll, use multi-touch, and use a high quality touch screen. Make everything big enough to be finger friendly. Then add your own features. It's not copying, because you end up with something better than the competition: you're stealing and expanding.

Don't copy the iPhone. Steal the market.

The price on the Omnia is disgusting. I'd honestly much rather buy a PS3 (hell, I could actually buy an 80GB PS3 *and* a 60GB 360 *and* a PS3 HDMI cable for the price of an Omnia, and sorry, no phone on the planet is that awesome). It looks like such a great phone though, even the battery life doesn't seem so bad either, 5 and a half hours talk time and 500 hours standby these days is above average, and considering it's a Windows Phone, that's even better again.

Anyway, as for Nokia's latest offering, what's with them releasing everything in India first lately? I understand it's got a booming industry at the moment, but I still don't see why there's this sudden shift of focus. As for the phone itself, ehh, we'll see. I've been a little disappointed by Nokia's N95, when I tried my friend's the interface didn't seem too great and felt kinda laggy/sluggish. I really hope they fix this with their latest touchscreen offering, as using your fingers to touch demands a much more instant response, it's natural. Well, we'll see what the feature set and the pricing is like first.

Eh, everyone is saying that they have an iPhone killer, but none of them are living up the the hype of it. Its just a phone + touchscreen + apple logo. It's the logo that brings the hype, its like every new product that comes out from them has innovation. Wow touch screen mp4 player, not like archos had it before with tons more features. wow phone with toushcreen, not like imate, htc and the other loads of companies had it before... I like everyone else want's an iPhone, but in Kuwait, they're very overpriced, when the next shipment of 3Gs arrive in Kuwait my dad is getting one though.

I agree with everything you said, but the iPhone also integrates those features with each other much better (in my opinion) than any other phone, and it looks a lot better. Again, my opinion.

I've said it once, and I'll say it again: if you're trying to kill another product, you're going to fail. What you do when you're aiming at another product, is you're copying its features. Remember: good artists copy, great artists steal. That can in fact be applied here: when you copy, it's like playing catch up. When you steal, you have a solid idea of what you want. That idea develops beyond what the competition offers.

Apple stole the GUI for computers from Xerox. It's simply fact. But what most people miss is that in stealing it, they added their own ideas. Same thing with the iPhone: They blatantly stole the idea of a smartphone from companies like RIM and HTC, even Microsoft who make the software on some of the phones. But what they did was different: they used the other smartphones as a groundwork for the iPhone. It feels more logical: you flick to scroll, you tap to select, you pinch outward to expand/grow, and pinch inward to shrink. No buttons to fiddle around with, just a bit of logic.

The only way to kill the iPhone is to go above and beyond what it offers. Use flick to scroll, use multi-touch, and use a high quality touch screen. Make everything big enough to be finger friendly. Then add your own features. It's not copying, because you end up with something better than the competition: you're stealing and expanding.

Don't copy the iPhone. Steal the market.

truth spoken.

that whole post should be copied and quoted in every friggin topic that seems to turn into a flamewar here.

unfortunately its too long and most of the users wont bother reading it. were on the internet, for gods sake! :p

Here we go again with another so-called I-Phone Killer. Samsung couldn't do it. LG Couldn't do it and Nokia will not do it either. I-Phone is I-phone and nothing comes even remotely close to it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!