[Official] Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts


Recommended Posts

I was a bit dubious about this game, turning Banjo-Kazooie into a game about vehicles? Well, I've actually been playing a few hours now and it's pretty good. Can't say I wouldn't prefer classic platforming style of old, but it's not a bad game because of it. It's different, but I suppose that's good. I love all the references to the old games.

I have to say though, the graphics and art style are amazing! Seriously impressed by the quality. The one thing I always love about Rare is you can see and feel just how much effort was put into making it. This game is gonna take many hours of my time now :p

I was a bit dubious about this game, turning Banjo-Kazooie into a game about vehicles? Well, I've actually been playing a few hours now and it's pretty good. Can't say I wouldn't prefer classic platforming style of old, but it's not a bad game because of it. It's different, but I suppose that's good. I love all the references to the old games.

I have to say though, the graphics and art style are amazing! Seriously impressed by the quality. The one thing I always love about Rare is you can see and feel just how much effort was put into making it. This game is gonna take many hours of my time now :p

QFT :yes:

I'll reserve my full opinion until I've finished it though :p I still hope the next Banjo (is there one planned? hope so!) will go back to it's roots.

Will get Banjo-Kazooie for XBLA in the meantime. I'm surprised it was even allowed to be released on XBLA, don't Nintendo hold some of the rights to it?

There hasn't been any rumours of Banjo 3 to my knowledge, but they have talked about making another Killer Instrinct just the past few days! Another beloved franchise of Rare's.

I'm not sure how Rare got around the IP with Nintendo for XBLA, but I'm happy they did. Banjo 2 is coming to XBLA as well. I hope they can do something in the future with Goldeneye as well, but that's a whole different situation compared to BK.

I'm liking this more as I play it, it's pretty solid, but it's still a spin off in my eyes!

Would kill for a Banjo 3 on this engine, with development time improvements.

Need more HD 3D platformers this generation, not had many to go on :(

I think that is what is holding me back from getting the game. I really love playing it but with all the AAA titles out this fall, I'm so backed up its not funny.

I know what you mean. I actually probably won't get to play it again until the weekend or later, not even because of other games. I have a research paper to write, and then course reading material to catch up on as exams start late next week. I just happened to wake up about an hour earlier than I usually do today so I figured I might as well give it a go.

-Spenser

Need more HD 3D platformers this generation, not had many to go on :(

Yeah I never got the fact they said if they did a straight platformer they would end up just remaking the older games. Theres so much that can be done in the genre and it's one thats had far too few titles, especially quality ones.

  • 3 weeks later...
Banjo patched with SDTV text option

by Tom Bramwell

Rare has reportedly patched Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts so that dialogue boxes and prompts are easier to read on standard-definition TVs.

The latest auto-downloading title update turns on large text by default, according to forumites, and introduces a toggle to the brightness and contrast options menu.

When it launched in late October, Banjo was criticised for its tiny on-screen text, which was difficult to make out on smaller SDTVs, impossible to adjust, and important to making progress.

It's the same problem that affected Capcom's Dead Rising in 2006, although to Rare's credit the developer responded to concerns with an update, whereas Capcom didn't.

Sadly we don't have a copy of Banjo in the office, but images on numerous blogs and widespread reports from users confirm its existence.

For more on the game, which transplants Rare's lovable bear and bird character combo into a build-your-own-racer, check out our Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts review.

Source: Eurogamer

Got this for Xmas and so far I'm so disappointed in this game. Shouldn't have expected anything different I guess after reviews but this game simply is not fun in any way shape or form from what I've played so far. And it could have been but Rare seem to have ignored all the hands on previews that were given that said the game controlled like a dog and have released it anyway. The vehicles bounce around like no tomorrow and generally don't do what you want them to. Add to that some other stupid things like having to constantly get out of the vehicle to pull a switch or something and you have a game thats just more tedious than it is enjoyable.

It's a shame IMHO. Not only to see Rare continue releasing games that come close but miss the mark constantly but also that they have continued to release average titles for a number of years now while a company like Ensemble gets disbanded by MS. To think they used to be my favorite game company back in the 90's.

The other issue besides the controls is that the game doesn't even address one of the issues Rare seems to have with platformers in that the games are collectathons. Not that I even agree that that was a problem, but this game is far worse than the older Banjo's or Mario series have ever been since your not only still collecting jiggies and notes but your also collecting engine parts to help your vehicles performance. Hell theres even collectables to unlock by playing the original on XBLA.

I'm a bit lost as to how this game became such a mess to be honest.

As others have mentioned, hopefully they use the engine to make a traditional game because the engine seems very capable to me and all this one really needed was another month or two of testing and tweaking the physics.

Yeah well theres an ok game there, it just doesn't feel right at all IMHO. I'm going to try sticking with it and seeing if after getting more parts the vehicles begin to handle a bit better.

But the disappointing thing is IMHO this has been the trend with Rare in recent years, where they get close to a really good game and then release something that has a few game play elements that let the rest of it down. If the vehicles handled better IMHO it'd be a high 80's maybe even low 90's game. Well I personally think it would be anyway.

Edited by Smigit
I got the game for Xmas too, and I eagerly await New Year's when I'll finally be with the other half of my Xbox's power cable and can actually play it...

man that must suck. haha

Rare didn't want to make another platformer like you & others described though. They wanted to do something new with the BK universe.
Ohh I have no problem with it being different. As above my complaint is that so far, maybe verging 20 jigsaw pieces in, all the vehicles for me feel pretty awful to drive and given thats the core gameplay mechanic then it hampers the entire game for me. I really don't mind the idea, just the implementation.

I'll stick with it for another 20 or 30 missions and maybe I'll start getting some parts to allow me to make something that handles more to my liking.

On the plus but, I shot through the original that came free with it in 2 days. Was so good to replay that even if I remembered where 99% of things were after 10 years.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!