MSI Announces Wind 2, Says Customers Hate Linux


Recommended Posts

Source: Wired

MSI Announces Wind 2, Says Customers Hate Linux

The guys at Laptop Mag got to spend some time with MSI's US sales boss Andy Tung, who gave them the lowdown on the hot little Wind netbook, past, present and future, including customers' mass rejection of the Linux version and the real reason for Windows continued success (people are used to it).

First, there will be a Wind 2, officially called the U120 (the current one is called the U100). It will sell alongside the popular, hackable netbook and come in at under $600. The Wind 2 will be a complete redesign -- new case, new hard drive and SSD options and a 3.5G mobile card inside. Ostensibly aimed at the business market, we can see this being a huge modder's hit (just put Broadcom compatible Wi-Fi inside for us OS X hackers, please, MSI). The Wind 2 will ship by the end of the year.

The next big news is that MSI have worked out a deal with a "a major U.S. retailer". Tung is keeping quiet on the details, but the official announcement should come this week. Guesses: Best Buy. A Wal Mart Wind?

Third, and saddest, is the fact that a lot of netbooks get returned, many more than is the case with regular-sized laptops. This is a general trend, but hidden within the numbers is a surprise -- people hate Linux. Tung:

Our internal research has shown that the return of netbooks is higher than regular notebooks, but the main cause of that is Linux. People would love to pay $299 or $399 but they don?t know what they get until they open the box. They start playing around with Linux and start realizing that it?s not what they are used to. They don?t want to spend time to learn it so they bring it back to the store. The return rate is at least four times higher for Linux netbooks than Windows XP netbooks.

Are people really too lazy to learn something new? The Linux netbooks I have played with are simple things, but they do exactly what a netbook needs to do ? web, email, music and movies ? and they do it well enough. Do people really need to pay an extra $50 for Windows, which runs slower on the Atom chip and offers a bunch of extras which aren't needed on a netbook (especially a space-limited 4GB netbook)?

Finally, a teaser from Tung. Laptop mag asked him what differentiates the Wind from Lenovo and Samsung's netbooks. "Well you would be surprised who makes those notebooks." he said.

I have this conversation all the time with my friend...

Him: Normal people don't want Linux on their netbooks, they want Windows.

Me: Oh they want Linux, they just don't know it yet.

I think that Linux is perfect for devices like these, as it's so customisable...and am I right in thinking it makes it cheaper? Either way, you don't hear regular people complaining their phones run Symbian instead of Windows Mobile.

On a device like this, I would prefer Linux too.

Kinda OT, Laptop Magazine is awesome! I need to get a subscription, because I can't find anyone local that carries it (maybe Barnes and Nobel do). I picked an issue up at an airport this last summer and ended up reading every single article in it. I "flip through" a lot of magazines, and this was one that actually had well written and interesting articles.

It doesn't help that the linux distributions shipped on many netbooks are garbage.

I don't think the ASUS Xandros repos have been updated in like 6 months.

e.g. I'm still posting from firefox 2.x because I can't update GTK+ without breaking everything.

I have this conversation all the time with my friend...

Him: Normal people don't want Linux on their netbooks, they want Windows.

Me: Oh they want Linux, they just don't know it yet.

I think that Linux is perfect for devices like these, as it's so customisable...and am I right in thinking it makes it cheaper? Either way, you don't hear regular people complaining their phones run Symbian instead of Windows Mobile.

The problem with your argument is that "people" don't want customizeable. They just want it working, easy and most of all familiar.

The problem wih yoru argument is that "people" don't want customizeable. They just want it working, easy and most of all familiar.

Indeed. It's the same reason, or at least one of the many possible reasons, that people like console gaming over pc gaming. They just want to turn it on and have it work like they expect it to.

The problem wih yoru argument is that "people" don't want customizeable. They just want it working, easy and most of all familiar.

The problem with your post is that shakey was referring to OEMs who market devices. "perfect for devices like these, as it's so customisable" refers to the OEM's ability to trim down and supply only the apps (browser, mail client, etc) that the OEM chooses.

;)

I have this conversation all the time with my friend...

Him: Normal people don't want Linux on their netbooks, they want Windows.

Me: Oh they want Linux, they just don't know it yet.

I think that Linux is perfect for devices like these, as it's so customisable...and am I right in thinking it makes it cheaper? Either way, you don't hear regular people complaining their phones run Symbian instead of Windows Mobile.

I certainly agree, but people don't want to buy a computer for the family, and not be able to run all these programs on it. They want what everyone else has...

The average family doesn't know very much about PC's, but they default to Windows, because they know how to use it.

The problem with your post is that shakey was referring to OEMs who market devices. "perfect for devices like these, as it's so customisable" refers to the OEM's ability to trim down and supply only the apps (browser, mail client, etc) that the OEM chooses.

;)

but the user still gets an unfamiliar system.

oh and OEMs could get a CE verion of windows and make it just as customized, and isn't there also a special netbook version of XP now ?

For doing what, you can watch 720p videos on single core atom netbooks, what more power do you need, battery life would seriously suck juice.

Intel have already stated the the dual core atoms were made for nettops not netbooks.

b/c it makes the not-so-fast Atom that much faster :happy:

as the other guy said, it's allready fast enough to do stuffthe netbook isn't very good for anyway.

It's a netbook what would you need so much power for on a netbook. it's not like you're gonna do 3DS MAX renders on it, or play COD4 on it.

For doing what, you can watch 720p videos on single core atom netbooks, what more power do you need, battery life would seriously suck juice.

Intel have already stated the the dual core atoms were made for nettops not netbooks.

Depends on what codec is being used and the operating system. I have several 720p films that can not decode fast enough on a 2.0GHz Pentium M (which by benchmarks blows away an Atom) when using Linux since the graphics driver does not accelerate decoding (Nvidia 7800GTX Go). Viewing 720p content is much better in Windows since the Nvidia driver supports video decoding, maybe it will make to the Linux driver someday.

I certainly agree, but people don't want to buy a computer for the family, and not be able to run all these programs on it. They want what everyone else has...

The average family doesn't know very much about PC's, but they default to Windows, because they know how to use it.

Its more like many think that PC and Windows are the same thing, like a Mac is to OSX. Many just don't know that there is a choice out there now. You can make Linux look and act just like Windows and even OSX and most wouldn't even be able to tell the difference.

BTW, my 72 year old mother has an Asus Eee PC with Linux and she likes it just fine.

You know, my mum recently got one of these new smaller notebooks, and it came with a Linux variant on it. I was worried at first because she is very "I don't want to learn something new to accomplish the same tasks I have always accomplished". You know what? Rightly so!

However, she boots it up, and there is a ****ing great big in your face icon for "WEB", "EMAIL", "DOCUMENTS", "MUSIC" etc

It's like a lot of home hardware, the OS is now transparent, she doesn't need to learn it. You don't need to learn an OS to operate your tumble dryer, dishwasher, VCR, TV. These little handheld laptops are appliances and as such, I think they should fall into the same "Get the job done" category.

Off the back of this, I have installed Ubunto on an old laptop I had codemned to the loft. My GF now uses is to check hotmail, facebook, download music, sync her iPod and probably send naked pictures to strange men. She's happy, I'm happy, lover69 is happy!

The problem with your post is that shakey was referring to OEMs who market devices. "perfect for devices like these, as it's so customisable" refers to the OEM's ability to trim down and supply only the apps (browser, mail client, etc) that the OEM chooses.

;)

I bet the real reason for supplying Linux over XP is the HDD space consumed. If XP takes a good couple of Gig, which will no doubt expand (Show me a Windows Install that doesn't), then that is valuable space over say a 250mb Linux install.

There is also a small speed increase but if XP is stripped down enough as well then I doubt the increases would be that great, nothing that your average consumer would complain about.

From a business point of view, XP is obviously the money maker. I don't see why the OEM would be bothered, unless something on the system was compromised. I put it down to space. After all, the Eee PC only came with XP when it shipped with a 20gb drive.

I certainly agree, but people don't want to buy a computer for the family, and not be able to run all these programs on it. They want what everyone else has...

The average family doesn't know very much about PC's, but they default to Windows, because they know how to use it.

That is precisely why I questioned the distribution choice for the original Wind. Ubuntu (either Gutsy Gibbon or the current Hardy Heron, or even olde reliable Feisty Fawn) would have made more sense, as it requires little fiddling, is supremely small, and is actually designed for non-techies.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!