Man Accused of Binding Teen's Hands on Flight


Recommended Posts

DENVER (AP) -- A 29-year-old man was arrested Tuesday for allegedly binding the hands of a teenager sitting next to him on a Southwest Airlines flight and trying to tape her older sister's hands as well.

The U.S. attorney's office said Ezra Wallace has been charged with two counts of assault aboard an aircraft for the incident on a San Diego-to-Denver flight on Aug. 1.

According to an arrest affidavit, Wallace and the two teenage sisters were seated in the same row on the flight. Officials said Wallace did not know the girls.

Before the plane took off, he allegedly tried to take a photograph of the older sister, who was seated in the aisle seat, but she covered her face. During the flight, the younger sister, who is 16, said Wallace took out some pre-torn strips of white athletic tape from his backpack and used a figure eight pattern to tie her hands together with the tape.

The older sister managed to free her sister, tearing off the tape with her teeth. Afterward, Wallace allegedly tried to tape the older sister's hands to those of her younger sibling, according to the document. A flight attendant who saw what was happening then moved the two girls to a different row with their brother.

Wallace was allowed to stay on the Denver-bound flight, and the FBI interviewed the 16-year-old a week later.

According to the affidavit, Wallace said he was ''drunk and blurry'' during the flight because he drank about a half-pint of vodka beforehand.

The federal public defender's office, which is expected to represent Wallace, said it could not comment because lawyers hadn't received information about the case yet.

U.S. Attorney spokesman Jeff Dorschner said Wallace's arrest was delayed because of ''investigative work'' but wouldn't elaborate.

Wallace remains in custody in Colorado.

source

Why didn't they have police on the ground waiting for him to get off the plane? They said they waited awhile. Sure enough that alone from what is said that happened on the plane would have been enough for the police to take action as soon as the plane landed.

:whistle:

Who is the "why don't you take a seat" guy?

good luck opening a door at 3xxxx feet

Well, opening it would be rather easy, closing it might be trickier ....

Why didn't they have police on the ground waiting for him to get off the plane? They said they waited awhile. Sure enough that alone from what is said that happened on the plane would have been enough for the police to take action as soon as the plane landed.

So, that's really surprising because with the security rules now in planes and airports, the stewards should have warned the pilots, who would have called air traffic control, who would have called the police to pick that guy at landing.

That story sounds fishy...

umm did you learn anything in high school about "pressure"? :rolleyes:

Did YOU?? The pressure inside an airplane at altitude is HIGHER than the pressure outside, so opening the door (which opens outward) is not difficult at all, but only a moron would do it except in an emergency.

Did YOU?? The pressure inside an airplane at altitude is HIGHER than the pressure outside, so opening the door (which opens outward) is not difficult at all, but only a moron would do it except in an emergency.

you might check your facts again :rolleyes:

And which fact do you claim is wrong??

http://www.boeing.com/commercial/safety/faq.html#FAQ6

Can the doors open in flight?

Hollywood has made quite a few thrillers through the years depicting people getting sucked out of airplanes. It's some people's worst nightmare! It's also extremely unlikely.

First of all, commercial jets are made of extremely strong stuff. The materials are lightweight, but the structure is designed to be incredibly strong. It's also designed to be "fault tolerant," meaning that if one part of structure fails, other parts will take up the loads and the airplane will continue to fly safely. There's also a comprehensive program in place to ensure the structural integrity of older planes through periodic inspections, replacement of structural components, and modifications.

As for the doors, they cannot be opened once an airplane is airborne and pressurized. To facilitate breathing and passenger comfort, airplanes are pressurized to the equivalent atmosphere of 8,000 feet. Since airplanes typically cruise above 30,000 feet, the air pressure inside the plane is much greater than the pressure outside -- and that pressure differential makes it impossible to open the door, even if somebody wanted to do such a thing.

If an emergency landing is necessary, as the plane descends, the pilots slowly depressurize the plane, so the doors can open immediately after the plane touches down. Emergency exits are designed to open once a plane has landed.

:rolleyes: any more comments?

Edited by webeagle12
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      445
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!