Linux vs windows


Recommended Posts

It really depends on what you want to do I guess, for example I use Ubuntu for everything except for playing games. I like the control and security of Linux, and just the plethora of options you can do to customize it. I must say in Linux is a lot more customizable than Windows. But the draw back of this; you need to have fairly advanced knowledge of computer systems to get the most out of it.

Windows is a good all-purpose operating system, and it works great for the general public. Microsoft have made it in such a way, that even the most illiterate user can't really screw up the OS anymore.

My current set up is Ubuntu 98% of tasks, and then I have a bare-bones XP installed for gaming.

To define what OS is "better" is like trying to compare chalk and cheese! Both have their place, this depending on what it is that you or your company require or need! Newer versions of desktop Linux have become more mainstream and as a rule are solid and pretty easy to use!

You can't ask what OS is better? You have to ask... "What do I want to do with my computer?"

I like both. Ubuntu is awesome, if you don't have a "fake RAID". XP kicks ass for all the games I play.

OS X, *nix, XP, Vista... all have very strong points in different areas; it's like playing a game and having to chose a character to use. All depends on your strategy.

I like Ubuntu just for the complete customization, and the fact that its a bit faster than my Vista on the same machine. Windows, however, since I've been using it for practically all of my life, is a bit more comfortable - its like having a stuffed animal you kept as a child for a long time, then you got another stuffed animal and it doesn't have that 'used smell' but you still play with both.

I think different OS's suit different platforms and uses. I would argue that no one OS is "better" than another.

On my desktop, I would be hard pushed to replace Vista as it suits me perfectly.

On an EeePC, a variant of Linux just feels much more suitable.

Horses for courses...

I like Ubuntu just for the complete customization, and the fact that its a bit faster than my Vista on the same machine. Windows, however, since I've been using it for practically all of my life, is a bit more comfortable - its like having a stuffed animal you kept as a child for a long time, then you got another stuffed animal and it doesn't have that 'used smell' but you still play with both.

Have to agree with you there, I am fairly new to *nix.. I had played around quickly with previous builds over the years but never got any build at that time without same major issue. I remembered codecs back in the day were a huge issue. Three years later I must admit it has progressed greatly. I am still most comfortable with Windows, but learning the ins and out of Linux is entertaining and it helps learning multiple operating systems.

I prefer Windows Vista to every other operating system I've ever used.

Now, does that make Windows Vista the best operating system ever? No, of course not. I like Vista, and you may not. And that's just fine. For the record, I've also used Mac OS X (from Tiger onward) and have installed every Ubuntu release since 6.06 (although I've only used 8.04 onward for extended periods of times.) The great thing about using many different OS is that you see the pros and cons of all of them. With Windows, all my software and hardware works. However, I also understand that with such a wide array of software, not all of it will look the same and function the same. Mac OS X has far less software, but I can be assured that most native Mac applications will look the same and function the same. Consistency is key when using the Mac. On Linux, I know that not all my hardware will work immediately, but I also know that I can make it work if I want to. Likewise, I like that when using Linux, I can change anything I want. There are no restrictions on what I can and can't do.

The bottom line is that neither Linux or Windows is better than the other. Use them both and go with the one you like. Or, use both. Or use something else. And that's why we have choice in this world.

My strategy is to win... *Boots Windows 3.1* mwhahahahahhaa!

Are you sure it's not... WINDOWS 2000!?!??!

I mean, DOS 6.22 was bad ass. 3.11 for Workgroups? Smartdrive is forever! Long live memmaker!

depends upon the need .......

Where is markjensen ?

Oh him? He's connected like 7 of 9 to a Borg-Linux node downloading the new kernel. It's like regeneration.... but recompiling.

I appreciate ll of the mature answers here...... *yay*

As everyone has said, the "best" OS is the one that you choose for yourself. Each has it's own pluses and minuses, however, it is completely up to the user to determine what is the best OS for him / her to use. Those who jump on the "my OS is better than your OS" bandwagon fail to realize that the computing world is huge... like a giant tree. And there are many branches on that tree to play on. So therefore, there is room for everyone, no matter the choice.

My criteria for the best OS is one that is stable, secure, and fast....... and easy to use! :yes:

Linux vs. Windows? Let me ask you then, which is better, Pizza or Hamburgers? Both are good...both get the job done.

... can't we eat both at the same time?

Actually I am surprised no one has actually trolled this thread.. lol

Dude, you were supposed to save that until at least the forth page! :p

perhaps if reworded to something like Which OS do you use and why, might get a better picture of the OS landscape.

Personally at home i use only Mac's / Mac OSX 10.5 as i find it suites all my media and other home related needs. I use windows at work as it provides me with all the tools needed to get my work done, Visio, Borland Delphi, MS SQL Server tools etc.. etc..

For Linux, there's also the question of which distro, or more precisely, which package management system you like best.

Or which desktop manager / window manager you choose. Each produces a different kind of user interface and user experience.

depends upon the need .......

Where is markjensen ?

Oh him? He's connected like 7 of 9 to a Borg-Linux node downloading the new kernel. It's like regeneration.... but recompiling.

:p

I was sleeping! Darn it, but after being awake for 16 hours of the day, I tend to get sleepy there at the end of it. :laugh:

The answers up to now have been pretty much what I would have said.

Linux suits me perfectly. It just keep chugging along, and is effortless to keep everything updated. I love the package manager, infinitely preferable to Microsoft's "Add/Remove" bit, which really just relies on the app writer to create their own install/remove methods.

If I had a requirement to run AutoCAD at home, or if I were a professional graphics designer who needed the CYMK colorspace of Photoshop (which GIMP does not support), then my answer would probably not be "Linux", but Windows or OSX.

Obviously, there's no best. It boils down to personal preference, and/or the tasks you need your computer for.

I personally use Linux atm, but in a dual-boot setup just in case I ever need Windows (like, when GTA4 gets released for PC :p )

Yeah same, the amusing part is I had to magically install Windows after I installed Linux.. my bad.. So I had to use a program called Super Grub which recovers the linux mbr after I install Windows. Oh it was a pain, but now I have a nice little 20g partition purely for gaming in Windows.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!