Linux vs windows


Recommended Posts

Personally I love using Windows but if you mess around warez section too much you're just asking to get malware lol

I had Vista on my laptop but I'm testing out Intrepid Ibex (Ubuntu 8.10 Beta) To be honest I'm finding open source just right for my needs

I use monodevelop for my CPP applications

Rythembox is simply da bomb!

Open Office works for my basic needs of word processing and opening up ppt files for school related materials.

I don't have to worry about installing any AV or AMW (Anti Malware) apps.

Only con really is just getting a decent photoshop like application which gimp is trying to become seeing the latest betas but I just don't want to run photoshop through wine. It makes me feel like apps are somewhat broken when emulating though wine.

It is like that if ur primary OS is linux then you need Windows OS as seconday OS ........for running / doing special task ........

and if u r using only Windows OS I think u can run almost all application but u have fear of security

(Not sure, It my point of view .... may be i m wrong)

as all here say that we use window OS play games .......and as mark also said "uses windows to run autocad"

It is like that if ur primary OS is linux then you need Windows OS as seconday OS ........for running / doing special task ........

and if u r using only Windows OS I think u can run almost all application but u have fear of security

It is kind of like that, if you have some of these "special tasks/apps" that only run in Windows. Wine is pretty capable, but not 100%.

EDIT: I see that you added to your post, and, yes, AutoCAD is a good example of a special app that requires Windows.

I really want to know we also faces such problem in Mac OS as i never experienced about it .......

I m using window OS (always) .... try linux but never adopt it as my main OS ......

I installed linux (fedora 4,5) many times but able to work for next 3-4 days

may be i just know few things about it

how to run internet , configure samba server and apache server (what i read during my course)

but i really want to explore linux as much as i explored window OS

Among Linux and Windows, Which operating system is better and why?

1) Linux

2) Windows

3) I don't know

Post your answer with relavant reasons and logics

both are fine to use. linux is good and secure right out of the box unlike windows. but linux has alot of things it does not support yet like gaming, laptop support, syncing pda's & phones, etc....

i will go back to linux ubuntu after the 1st of the year when the new 8.10 version is released and the bugs are worked out. i will probably always have to dual boot with xp or vista for gaming and syncing support.

Uh oh... Another one of these polls...

For me, Windows because it lets me do what I need to do!

Though I've played with and have interest in Linux and have done so since around 1998.

I know and you know that eventualy this thread will become out of control... just like MAC vs. PC...

Well, let's hope not. So far it has been very civil and mature! :yes:

well the bottom line is windows & apple dominate the market. linux is not mainstream yet and does need to support more things before it becomes so.

im not bashing linux as i use it often but i can foresee the day it becomes fully mainstream it will no longer be a "free" product either.

For me, Windows. I seem to waste far too much time just generally dicking around with Linux to be productive. Anymore, Linux is more of a novelty, just to tinker with. I've gotten past the point where what OS I use is some sort of ideological crusade, and just want to do stuff with my computer. The OS is just the means to the end, not the end itself. And Vista generally leaves me alone and takes care of itself to the point where I don't have to worry about most crap and can just do what I need to do.

both are fine to use. linux is good and secure right out of the box unlike windows.

...

Linux is generally secure in its initial setup, out-of-the-box.

But I think your Windows thinking is a bit dated. Have you met Vista at all? I am not a Microsoft supporter, but I must commend them on making the necessary changes to align themselves with a more secure computing model (UAC, limited user accounts both come to mind). This release from them has what XP should have included, and it is a welcome improvement, in my opinion.

... but i can foresee the day it becomes fully mainstream it will no longer be a "free" product either.

:blink:

Explain how, when anyone has access to the code, and a fork of anything can be done should someone try to violate the GPL and close their code.

Linux is generally secure in its initial setup, out-of-the-box.

Have you met Vista at all? I am not a Microsoft supporter, but I must commend them on making the necessary changes to align themselves with a more secure computing model (UAC, limited user accounts both come to mind).

Seems to me that the folks at Microsoft have taken some lessons from the Linux or Unix crowd in making sure that all changes or initiation of changes are first approved by the user (no "blanket" installations). Anyone who has used any *nix variation has had to log in as a super user or super user do ("sudo") in order to initiate system or program changes.

Linux is generally secure in its initial setup, out-of-the-box.

But I think your Windows thinking is a bit dated. Have you met Vista at all? I am not a Microsoft supporter, but I must commend them on making the necessary changes to align themselves with a more secure computing model (UAC, limited user accounts both come to mind). This release from them has what XP should have included, and it is a welcome improvement, in my opinion.

:blink:

Explain how, when anyone has access to the code, and a fork of anything can be done should someone try to violate the GPL and close their code.

what i meant is the day it is in the stores on shelves.

windows is secure to a certain point "out of the box" but is much better when adding a better antivirus / firewall solution. i actually wish linux had a few different options for firewalls.

what i meant is the day it is in the stores on shelves.

windows is secure to a certain point "out of the box" but is much better when adding a better antivirus / firewall solution. i actually wish linux had a few different options for firewalls.

Linux has been on the store shelves, and I have purchased a Red Hat box (came with CD and manuals) when I first dabbled in Linux. That provides a convenient service to some users (as well as printed manuals which are nice), but it is not necessary to purchase, as one can download or just freely copy and share copies of CDs of Linux.

iptables allows you to do whatever you like.

There are several front-end GUI options to set the rules as you like. But really, what other option to iptables would be needed? Or are you thinking of wanting more front-ends to put different faces on the same function?

Well, for almost guarenteed compatability for hardwaresoftware, Windows is the way to go. If you want to specialise in computer-technology, like security, then use Backtrack 3. If you want a nice 'n easy free Windows replacement for surfing/light games (flash games, multi-format). My bus driver uses Ubuntu just for ripping CD's without DRM.

And you can't compare Windows and Linux directly, off the top of my head I can name these (current) distros- Fedora 9, Linpus (Based on Fedora 8), Backtrack 3, Ubuntu 8.04 (I think), kubuntu, gobuntu, Slax, DamnSmallLinux, SuSE, aaannd Shift. (Fedora Core 1 kept popping up in my head, I have a magazine disc of it in the drawer next to me, but I said 'current' heh.)

Within those though, you can get even more options, like DWMs, fancy stuff like Compiz, etc. It's a bit of a con, imo, as people who want to get started with Linux cannot say "I'm getting Linux, anyone got any advice for me?", as they inevitably get asked "What distro? Oh, I don't know <x> so you'll have to ask someone else."

It's worse than all the versions of Vista :p Ultimate, Premium, Basic, etc... people were getting confused with that even!

You should have just made a poll :p

I'd say... Windows, Linux has a lot of things I like better, like closing X instead of having to completely turn off your computers good :/ the Task Manager is better in Linux too. Oh and Compiz Fusion is f***ing COOOOLLLL lol.

But ether games don't work, or they are s*** :/

And WLM substitutes just aren't the same :(

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!