RIM share plunge could prompt Microsoft bid


Recommended Posts

http://www.forbes.com/reuters/feeds/reuter...R-ANALYSIS.html

http://finance.google.com/finance?client=news&q=RIMM

TORONTO (Reuters) - The recent plunge in the market value of BlackBerry maker Research In Motion (nasdaq: RIMM - news - people ) could leave the company vulnerable to a takeover from a well-capitalized buyer such as Microsoft Corp.

RIM's shares, which were worth more than $148 on the Nasdaq market just four months ago, now are trading around the $60 mark amid the U.S. financial crisis and margin pressures the company is experiencing because of expenses related to launching new smartphones.

"RIM is a massive strategic fit" for Microsoft, said Canaccord Adams analyst Peter Misek. "I'm fairly certain they have a standing offer to buy them at $50 (a share)."

In that scenario, RIM would have to continue declining to at least $40, thus allowing an offer of $50 to stand as a premium bid.

At current levels of $60 a share, RIM has a market value of about $34 billion. An offer of $50 a share would value the company at just over $28 billion.

hmm not good. this is one of the few companies that i hope doesn't go into Microsoft unless it's that or close. they're a good company in my opinion (despite the fact that i don't currently own nor have i ever owned a RIM product, although i am considering the Storm.) hopefully their stock goes back up!

microsoft aren't really interested in mobile hardware as they state over and over so i would reckon it's unlikely

They already bought Danger (makers of Sidekick), why not RIM?

Anyways as for the shares, the market is going down. RIM and every company should expect their stock price go down.

Why are "analysts" making rumors like this? Microsoft is not going to bid for RIM or anyone else. They just announced a $40b buyback on their shares which will see Microsoft borrowing money for the first time in ages to finance the buyback.

Microsoft is clearly spending its money on itself and they will not bid for RIM. He states that RIM is a "massive strategic fit" for Microsoft but does not explain why. He is a moron and knows nothing.

Why are "analysts" making rumors like this? Microsoft is not going to bid for RIM or anyone else. They just announced a $40b buyback on their shares which will see Microsoft borrowing money for the first time in ages to finance the buyback.

Microsoft is clearly spending its money on itself and they will not bid for RIM. He states that RIM is a "massive strategic fit" for Microsoft but does not explain why. He is a moron and knows nothing.

So you are telling me that you are better educated on the market than an analyst working at Forbes. I highly doubt it and you made me really laugh at the statement. But I do agree that it would be a good fit. Microsoft has stated that they want to bring the zune interface to a phone. But they have no interested in building their own phones from scratch. What better way to do that then buy out a well known and very established company.

The reason RIM is a good fit for MS is the use of the Exchange Server. Exchange Server runs on Windows. That means licensing for two big server products. Hence the fit. Microsoft does not care about blackberry, blueberry, whatever device. And yes they are buying back their own shares. Which is a good indicator that Microsoft thinks they will be making some good profit in the years to come. Instead of distributing part of the profit as dividends, they will be able to plow back more of that money back into business. This is usually a good sign of confidence on the company's part.

I can just see every time I reboot my BB having to wait to make sure my copy of BB is valid. And then of course if there's a problem the message will be to call Microsoft, meanwhile they'll have your phone locked so you can't make calls.

I can just see every time I reboot my BB having to wait to make sure my copy of BB is valid. And then of course if there's a problem the message will be to call Microsoft, meanwhile they'll have your phone locked so you can't make calls.

Yes because this is already standard practice within the already huge clientbase of winmobile devices. Not! Even with modded ROMS floating in the wild MS has no interest in your theories. You should be more worried about the next BB service outage :whistle:

So you are telling me that you are better educated on the market than an analyst working at Forbes. I highly doubt it and you made me really laugh at the statement.

Oh yes, because we all know analysts know everything. Just like the idiot at Goldman Sachs that downgraded the whole steel sector yesterday after the sector has lost 70% of its value in the past 2 months. Lets not mention they rated the whole sector a buy in July when commodities hit a top and now they are downgrading it when we are about to hit a bottom. Very smart, eh?

If you follow the stock market and have half a brain, you will know that a lot of analysts know nothing (notice I said a lot, not all). Just this Wednesday a Citi analyst downgraded GM. Where the hell was this analyst for the past year? He was recommending it in the 40's and 30's and now he downgrades it to a sell when GM is at $5. If you followed these idiots and their recommendations, you would be selling GM at a 80% loss and the steel sector at a 70% loss.

Need I say more?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      577
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!