• 0

Creative Suite 4 - Terrible!


Question

I was so excited for creative suite 4, especially for adobe photoshop 64bit and GPU accelaration. I tried the trial and photoshop was performing horribly it had horrible redraw issues when all i was doing was moving some text left and right. I compiled an app with Flash CS4 had a plethora of problems where it had been fine with CS3.

I am disappointed that adobe have released unfinished software. I was wondering if anyone else had tried CS4 yet?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/684266-creative-suite-4-terrible/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I doubt it's that bad. People just need to make sure they're using the graphics drivers from their manufacturer and not Windows Update. For ATi at least, the WU drivers don't include the OpenGL driver, so Vista falls back on software mode, which would obviously make for pretty horrible performance in Photoshop.

I'm installing the trial on my Athlon 6000+ with 6GB of RAM and an ATi HD 3870. Will tell you how it runs in a few minutes.

  • 0
You can download the FULL RETAIL Master Collection (7GB) directly from the Adobe servers:

1. Log out of Adobe/remove their cookies, if any.

2. Go to adobe.com

3. Click link: DOWNLOADS then scroll down to TRIAL DOWNLOADS

4. Choose Lightroom "TRY IT"

5. You'll be asked to login - so login or register w/ fake details

6. After login, you'll be taken to the Lightroom trial download page (to select version/language etc) - enter this address into your browser's url bar:

http://trials.adobe.com/Applications/MastC...STAMCS4_LS1.exe

http://trials.adobe.com/Applications/MastC...ESTAMCS4_LS1.7z

(if you're interested in the extra content, also use this: http://trials.adobe.com/Applications/MastC...4_Cont_LS1.exe)

  • 0

well, instead of getting me a new computer.... I went ahead and got Photoshop CS4.

and...

I see no problems.

I just switched from CS2, and it works like a dream.

specs:

p4 2.93Ghz

2.5GB DDR1 RAM

Nvidia 6600 512MB Graphics

anyone who complains needs to look in deeper to see if thier computer just needs to be reconfigured to run with it...

  • 0
well, instead of getting me a new computer.... I went ahead and got Photoshop CS4.

and...

I see no problems.

I just switched from CS2, and it works like a dream.

specs:

p4 2.93Ghz

2.5GB DDR1 RAM

Nvidia 6600 512MB Graphics

anyone who complains needs to look in deeper to see if thier computer just needs to be reconfigured to run with it...

Yes, all apps faster PS 32bit version using my 4850 (sub $200) amazing speed zooming, rotating all effects are instant. wow.

  • 0
Sorry about double post but I've created a test psd. If someone has Photoshop CS4 installed test the following PSD and try to move the text about and see if it moves smoothly.

http://localhostr.com/files/71c3f3/Test.psd

On my x64 E6750, 8600GTS, 2GB it's just a little less smooth than CS3.

It's like a 0.5sec render time.

  • 0
On my x64 E6750, 8600GTS, 2GB it's just a little less smooth than CS3.

It's like a 0.5sec render time.

Yeah after comparing side by side I have to agree it is a bit less smooth that CS3. Do you feel cs4 generally feels sluggish? I guess a outer glow takes considerable processing power but with GPU accelaration should it not me smoohter than CS3 :/

  • 0
Sorry about double post but I've created a test psd. If someone has Photoshop CS4 installed test the following PSD and try to move the text about and see if it moves smoothly.

http://localhostr.com/files/71c3f3/Test.psd

I tried it, and it doesn't move smoothly at all. It jerks around a ton. I also tried it on CS3 and the result was the same. :huh:

Specs:

2.8GHz Quad Core

6GB RAM

2x ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

  • 0

GPU Acceleration isn't for all tasks... As far as I know it's only rotating and zooming... And zooming is a lot smoother...

I don't use Photoshop that often, but Dreamweaver has got a major speed increase.

  • 0
Sorry about double post but I've created a test psd. If someone has Photoshop CS4 installed test the following PSD and try to move the text about and see if it moves smoothly.

http://localhostr.com/files/71c3f3/Test.psd

yeah jerky for me aswell.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Also known for https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/29/adware-internet.   Regards, Aryeh Goretsky    
    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!