GTA IV for PC (official)


Recommended Posts

I'm sure a patch is in the works. GTA IV still doesn't support SLI/CrossFire configurations. Dual GPU video cards do not run the game properly too.

Actually, crossfire does work. SLI doesn't but will do in an upcoming patch and driver update from nVidia.

Source

Also bare in mind that the same file mentioned that current generation hardware will run the game on medium settings and the higher settings are reserved for 'future generations' of hardware. Meaning, Rockstar are just saying there's nothing wrong with the game, there just isn't hardware that's good enough to run it on the highest settings yet.

Actually, crossfire does work. SLI doesn't but will do in an upcoming patch and driver update from nVidia.

Source

Also bare in mind that the same file mentioned that current generation hardware will run the game on medium settings and the higher settings are reserved for 'future generations' of hardware. Meaning, Rockstar are just saying there's nothing wrong with the game, there just isn't hardware that's good enough to run it on the highest settings yet.

It doesn't seem the highest settings make the game look that more amazing than the console versions.

Actually, crossfire does work. SLI doesn't but will do in an upcoming patch and driver update from nVidia.

Source

Also bare in mind that the same file mentioned that current generation hardware will run the game on medium settings and the higher settings are reserved for 'future generations' of hardware. Meaning, Rockstar are just saying there's nothing wrong with the game, there just isn't hardware that's good enough to run it on the highest settings yet.

oh please !

when they got stuck , they just say future use . BS

Yes yes, but is it any good?? I doubt my old dual core 6300/2gig ram/nvidia 7900 256mb will be able to run it, mind. But I would like to try it once i upgrade since i refuse to buy a console!

For the record, Tomb Raider: Underworld is thoroughly unplayable on my pc aswell :(

Just a note, I was reading around on other forums and if you think about it PC version does run better,

detail distance of 22 = console

view distance of 10 = console

360 res = 1280x720

settings = less then medium

so running the game on PC

at 1680x1050 = 50% increase in pixels

at high settings

with detail distance of 70-100

view distance of 30-40

and you get an ave 25fps which is about what console gets, although there are many places where the console's frame rate goes well below 20fps.

If you set your resolution to 1280x720 you can set the rendering to high and max out the viewing and detail distance

Yes there are some bugs to be worked out but is goot that R* gave you the option to max out details as you get better hardware.

They could have just made a default setting so that everyone is running the game at lower res and lower details so you can get higher frame rate.

I do hope though that they resolve the multiplayer bug.

Cheers

Just a note, I was reading around on other forums and if you think about it PC version does run better,

detail distance of 22 = console

view distance of 10 = console

360 res = 1280x720

settings = less then medium

so running the game on PC

at 1680x1050 = 50% increase in pixels

at high settings

with detail distance of 70-100

view distance of 30-40

and you get an ave 25fps which is about what console gets, although there are many places where the console's frame rate goes well below 20fps.

If you set your resolution to 1280x720 you can set the rendering to high and max out the viewing and detail distance

Yes there are some bugs to be worked out but is goot that R* gave you the option to max out details as you get better hardware.

They could have just made a default setting so that everyone is running the game at lower res and lower details so you can get higher frame rate.

I do hope though that they resolve the multiplayer bug.

Cheers

The Xbox 360 runs the game at 1280x720? You sure?

The Xbox 360 runs the game at 1280x720? You sure?

Yes, Xbox 360 runs the game at 720p native. The PS3 on the other hand runs the game 600p native, though with added filters to 'improve' the graphics.

And I gotta say, this is a horribly optimized port and they need to start sorting out their god damn servers! 12 hours ago my copy failed authentication, now I just can't connect to Rockstar Social Club, means still no saving under the Steam version.

OH MY GOD. this is the most poorly optimized crappy port I have ever played. SHAME on rockstar. I get like 20 fps and the game looks like crap and is all jagged and has no aa.

the console has 2xaa while the pc has none and you can't force it making the pc version look like a jagged mess.

and what the ****. I have to run GFWL, and this stupid rockstar social app and steam just to play.

Uh, I'm no PC gamer but aren't the new GTA IV texture resolutions higher now? That could mean a bigger filesize and I'm sure that there are MANY more textures (indoors, outdoors, cars, people, buildings, etc) in GTA IV than compared to FarCry 2 (at least what I've seen of it... open land, many reusable textures). And there's the radio and the diverse environmental sounds in GTA IV which should also take up some more space than when compared to FC2.

Of course, I haven't played FC2 but only seen a few videos, so I should shut up. 13.5GB vs 2.5GB is still big.

the textures in this game look like absolute crap.

Yes, Xbox 360 runs the game at 720p native. The PS3 on the other hand runs the game 600p native, though with added filters to 'improve' the graphics.

And I gotta say, this is a horribly optimized port and they need to start sorting out their god damn servers! 12 hours ago my copy failed authentication, now I just can't connect to Rockstar Social Club, means still no saving under the Steam version.

*Shakes fist* 640p! *Shakes fist*

That 40p means a world of difference :laugh:

depends on your processor. it will run like absolute **** if you have anything less than a quad.

Not necessarily true, I have AMD Opteron 180 running at 2.8GHz 2 GB RAM and 9600GT 512MB and the game runs pretty smooth at around 25FPS, on Medium Rendering and High Texture, and it does look good. HDR Lighting and reflections look great.

Now, I do expect some optimization with future patches and also I do expect them to fix the Social Club Login bug, but so far the game is fun to play and it looks great.

*Shakes fist* 640p! *Shakes fist*

That 40p means a world of difference :laugh:

Woops, 640p then, sorry 'bout that :p

With a bit of tweaking, the game looks great and runs just fine so now I'm off to play :)

EDIT: I just love messing around with the video editor!

73p7ys.png

Edited by Sethos
well it is just 1 hour and half

that too fast ! at least compared to me conection which will take a week full time to download the bloody thing lol

True, true. I should be happy about the fact that I only had to wait a total of 4 hours to download the game.

I'm getting over 30 FPS outside, so it's not a game limitation, definitely Vsync.

Game is looking better than ever and getting great performance, feel sorry for those who can't enjoy the game due to performance problems :/ Game is so much more fun when you got the mouse you constantly look around and can aim with the mouse as well, gets you out of some pretty tight spots a bit easier! Can't wait for them to sort out Social Club so I can start playing some Cops vs Robbers - One for All. Was impossible to find a decent game on the 360, would just end up as a lagfest, take hours to find a proper game and would just end too quickly.

Though looking around, so many people with performance problems are running Vista, any XP users with a below-expected performance?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!