GTA IV for PC (official)


Recommended Posts

There is one major reason why I don't accept that "Future PC" excuse - Why the hell does the game look better on those, let's be honest, gimped computers called Consoles? Shadows look so much better, view distance is great and it's running native 720p ( Well, on the 360 ) - Why the hell can't a computer with 4-5x the power run the same specs at a decent frame rate? It has poor optimization written all over it and Rockstar really need to pull their **** together.

Because it has obviously been tampered with or runs a different version, perhaps even a console shot.

Can never trust official screenshots

I guess we learnt that lesson the hard way. I bought GTA IV for the PC assuming it would look and run better. Boy was I wrong.

Supposedly, this is a PC screenshot of GTA IV. Why do the shadows look better? Beats me. It even looks like AA has been applied.

Maybe it's karma. This guy seems to be running the game with great performance, while some people with greater rigs can't:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9Zdnek3UaM

This is the reason why I started to back away from PC gaming, so many decent games these days suffer from porting issues and lazy developers. Granted my games does run fine, I could still be one of the unlucky ones. Last time I bought and messed around with a PC game was Crysis, we all know the story about that one.

No wonder why the PC scene isn't getting much love these days :/

Mine has been working better recently - its now playable with medium graphics at 1920 x 1080. The new 8.12 ATI driver made a world of difference, only problem now is some shadows still appear a little 'meshy'. I'm hoping with the hopefully forthcomming patch, and my new Core i7 Dell XPS things should further improve.

Maybe it's karma. This guy seems to be running the game with great performance, while some people with greater rigs can't:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9Zdnek3UaM

Nah if you render a video using the video clip function it plays back really smooth, i get 20odd fps but rendered a video out to 720p wmv and it plays smooth.

Maybe it's karma. This guy seems to be running the game with great performance, while some people with greater rigs can't:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9Zdnek3UaM

That person is using a Q6600 OC'd to 3.9 GHz, 6GB of RAM, and an HD 4850. It isn't surprising that it can run the game decently. The question is: What settings does he/she play at to make it run reasonably well? I have an E6750, 4GB of RAM, and an HD 4870. I get about 31 fps @ 1680x1050 (medium settings).

This is the reason why I started to back away from PC gaming, so many decent games these days suffer from porting issues and lazy developers. Granted my games does run fine, I could still be one of the unlucky ones. Last time I bought and messed around with a PC game was Crysis, we all know the story about that one.

No wonder why the PC scene isn't getting much love these days :/

I think we should put away our pitchforks and fire for now, so to speak. Wait for the patch and official drivers from ATI/NVIDIA. If the performance issues and bugs are still there, then lay the game to waste.

Mine has been working better recently - its now playable with medium graphics at 1920 x 1080. The new 8.12 ATI driver made a world of difference, only problem now is some shadows still appear a little 'meshy'. I'm hoping with the hopefully forthcomming patch, and my new Core i7 Dell XPS things should further improve.

You're using the beta version of Catalyst 8.12 right? I can't find the final release on AMD's website yet. I'm tempted to use that driver but I always stay away from beta drivers. They're a disaster waiting to happen.

8.12 got leaked, I too usualy stay away from beta drivers but was desperate to play gta iv.

8.12 do nothing for me, i was able to get it to run at 35fps, which is ok, but then alas, i was in the middle of a mission and then i got RESC10 error, and of course i lost all my progress, im done with it for now, its just a joke that they left errors like that in the final version of the game.

I think we should put away our pitchforks and fire for now, so to speak. Wait for the patch and official drivers from ATI/NVIDIA. If the performance issues and bugs are still there, then lay the game to waste.

I don't see why we can't demand a working, polished product? This was not released as a Beta test or a free trial - We should demand an optimized game that just works. Why is it PC users always needs to get treated as beta testers? We pay for our games, why do console gamers usually get a product that just works ...

This is a big thumbs down for Rockstar, yes they have time to fix it but won't change our first impression of the game.

8.12 got leaked, I too usualy stay away from beta drivers but was desperate to play gta iv.

The official 8.12 drivers? :o

I don't see why we can't demand a working, polished product? This was not released as a Beta test or a free trial - We should demand an optimized game that just works. Why is it PC users always needs to get treated as beta testers? We pay for our games, why do console gamers usually get a product that just works ...

This is a big thumbs down for Rockstar, yes they have time to fix it but won't change our first impression of the game.

I understand your frustration, trust me. I almost felt robbed after playing the game. The unfortunate thing is we can't get a refund so why dwell on how poorly optimized the game is? It's better to hope for the best. I sincerely hope a patch + optimized drivers will deliver a better GTA IV gaming experience.

Would everyone feel better if they renamed "medium" to "high"? Heck, would you feel better if they called it ultra? What about "your graphics card makes your penis larger"? Would that make you feel better?

I want games that push systems. It is not about the settings, but how it looks. Crysis looked 50% better at medium that almost all other games on high (or ultra, or OMG your penis is so large). The same can be said about GTA.

Would everyone feel better if they renamed "medium" to "high"? Heck, would you feel better if they called it ultra? What about "your graphics card makes your penis larger"? Would that make you feel better?

I want games that push systems. It is not about the settings, but how it looks. Crysis looked 50% better at medium that almost all other games on high (or ultra, or OMG your penis is so large). The same can be said about GTA.

Not really...

The game runs acceptably for me and I have a Q6700 with a 4870 512 and 4GB of Ram.

This game runs better than most people say I think. Even sill, it will be much better when optimised graphic drivers are released and the game is patched up. Im not 100% happy with the way this game runs but I know that this happens and I know it can (and will) be improved. People need to stop moaning about every little thing that makes them unhappy. And why not accept the "designed for a computer that is in the future" excuse, Crysis had the same reason?

So this is something that's been bugging me with new games left and right.

Basically, Why are more and more developers relying on GPU manufacturers to do the work of optimizing their games for them? Are they that lazy(or perhaps incompetent) that they can't do it on their own anymore? A game should be able to run fine from the day it's released, not only when new drivers are made specifically for it.

So this is something that's been bugging me with new games left and right.

Basically, Why are more and more developers relying on GPU manufacturers to do the work of optimizing their games for them? Are they that lazy(or perhaps incompetent) that they can't do it on their own anymore? A game should be able to run fine from the day it's released, not only when new drivers are made specifically for it.

I doubt its laziness or incompetence, more likely pressure from publishers or internal targets. If the game works well with a new patch AND new drivers then why moan about it? I mean its not perfect for me either but I don't expect everything to be.

Also don't compare this to a console release, its a completely different scenario. Consoles have all the same hardware so developing and testing it is pretty simple. PCs on the other hand have an unlimited combination of hardware and software making testing a very difficult game indeed.

I've been playing it today and so far I've managed to tweak it for the better. Still lacks FSAA and a desperate need to solve the texture pop in issue on HIGH settings.

Screens + more info here: http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthrea...=1#post13044114

After I updated to the latest nVidia Beta drivers, my In-game graphic settings keep resetting each time I start the game - Anyone else had that problem?

Me (Y) Doubt it's driver related, though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      141
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      89
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!